March 2003 - KLF - mailman.xmission.com

Re: [KLF] RE: Why Illuminati?
by TheMgnt＠aol.com 20 Mar '03

20 Mar '03

> Personally I think it was just to piss off a lot of people. I think that all > of B&J's actions were designed to make you think about what they were doing. I don't think so. Bill continues to use 5s and 23s, and, it could be argued, that he did so PRE-KLF. A while back, and I've mentioned this before, I noticed the Zoo logo could be mistaken for a 23: Z = 2 and the o's are stacked to look like 8: 28 or if looked at quickly, and due to the way the logo is designed: 23. I think Bill is completely into this. -paul Currently in rotation: Sparks - Lil Beethoven (really, the best album I've heard in years), KLF - various

1 0

Re: [KLF] Why the "Illuminati"?3
by Simon House 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

Its a new car thats come into the system. They wouldnt have had time to check that car out. It should have been checked out. There could have been a bomb on the car, for instance. It was a most stupid plan. It shouldnt even have been considered. The back up vehicle is there, not just to avert the paparazzi, but for instance, a motor cyclist with a pillion rider to pull up and shoot, or put a magnetised bomb on top of the car. Thats why the back up car is there - to stop any of that. Why they never had a back up car, God only knows. (I think I can offer a good guess without the need for Divine inspiration.) I had probably six or eight men I would consider professional bodyguards who I would have had on that job and Trevor Rees-Jones and Kes Wingfield, after what I have seen happened, would not have been in Paris that night. The Mercedes with Henry Paul at the wheel sped off from the rear entrance of the Ritz at 12.20am with Paul telling the paparazzi not to bother following because they would never catch him. Diana and Dodi were in the back seat and in the front was Trevor Rees-Jones, the former Para with the reputation for being fearless. Rees-Jones says he disagreed with the change of plan. He was not wearing a seat belt which is normal practice because body guards need to be free to react quickly. The car was driven at speed down the Rue Cambon and turned right down the Rue de Rivoli into the Place de la Concorde where it stopped briefly at the lights. The paparazzi photographer, Romuald Rat, on the back of a motor cycle, drew up alongside them here, but he says that Henri Paul jumped the lights on red and headed onto the dual carriageway alongside the River Seine called the Cours la Reine. The car plunged down into one tunnel, came back to the surface, and almost immediately went down into the very short tunnel at the Pont de UAlma. Here it went out of control and struck the 13th pillar in the centre of the tunnel which is lined with concrete pillars unprotected by crash barriers. Henri Paul and Dodi Fayed died immediately According to the autopsy report Diana was clinically dead within 20 minutes and this was long before she arrived at hospital. Trevor Rees-Jones survived the crash because he was wearing a seat belt and Diana and Dodi were not. This could be highly significant. Rees-Jones was not wearing a belt when they left the Ritz in accordance with normal practice for body guards, and when Romuald Rat took a photograph at the lights at the Place de la Concorde, Rees-Jones still did not have a seat belt on. But little more than a minute later when the car struck the pillar, he was wearing a seat belt. Why? If he donned the belt because for some reason he sensed danger, why did he not scream at Diana and Dodi to put their seat belts on? After all it only takes a second and the whole reason he was in the car was to protect them. Rees-Jones has some serious questions to answer here and he is giving no answers. Some bodyguards do put a seat belt on when the car is on a fast road, but Rees-Jones is not saying this. He says he doesnt know why he strapped himself in. And if they were going to Dodis flat, they would have been on the fast road for about a minute. All he says is that he remembers they were followed by two cars, one of them white, and a motorcycle, which is in keeping with the smokescreen story. But one simple fact about the crash has been missed by all the newspaper articles, magazine features, television documentaries and discussions I have seen, and by all but a few researchers. Everyone is agreed that the couple were being driven back to Dodis flat near the Arc de Triomphe when the crash happened. Well there is one glaring problem with that: The Pont de LAlma tunnel is not on the way to Dodis flat. It takes you away from that area. I have been to Paris and walked the route the car took that night, in fact I have walked extensively around that whole area, and the route to Dodis apartment is the same as the one they took earlier that night. You go to the Place de la Concorde and, half way around, you turn right into the Champs Elysees and drive straight up to Dodis flat on the right near the Arc de Triomphe (see Figure 53 overleaf). At that time of night it would take only a few minutes. But Henri Paul did not do that. He drove past the turning for the Champs Elysees, jumped the lights on red and sped down the duel carriageway to the Pont de LAlma. This took them AWAY from Dodis flat. I have heard it said that Paul was going a long way round to avoid the photographers and traffic, but the photographers would have been waiting at the flat anyway by the time they got there. What is most important to stress here is that Henri Pauls route was not the direct one to Dodis apartment, but it did ensure that it took them through the Pont de UAlma Tunnel, the significance of which is fantastic, as you will soon appreciate. Interestingly, it was after Paul went past the turning to Les Champs Elysees and headed towards the Pont de LAlma that Rees-Jones put his seat belt on. He says he cant remember why, but I can help him there. There can only be two reasons for this. Either he knew what was coming or he realised when Henri Paul screamed off from the lights that something was seriously wrong and he put the seat belt on to protect himself. But again if that is the case, why did he not tell Dodi and Diana to do the same? And if Rees-Jones had realised a potential danger, why had Dodi and Diana not seen it and taken the appropriate action to protect themselves? Im sorry if that upsets Rees-Jones family, but given the circumstances these are questions that need to be asked. Once the deed was done; the scapegoat was produced. The methods are so predictable, but they keep working so why change them? The Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray of the Diana assassination was the driver, Henri Paul. Once the paparazzi card had been played and focused public and media attention in the days after the crash, it was announced that Paul was three to four times over the French drink driving limit and that his blood contained traces of anti-depressant drugs, including Fluoxetine, the active ingredient of the infamous Prozac. The cause of the crash was simple, we were told. The driver was drunk. Tampering with blood samples or creating alcohol in the blood is childs play and so is the insertion of tiny balloons which release alcohol into the blood stream in stages. There was certainly no sign before he drove away from the Ritz that he was intoxicated to the extent, according to his blood tests, that he must have drunk the equivalent of eight Scotches on an empty stomach. A behavioural psychologist on the Independent Television documentary, Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, could find no evidence that he was drunk after studying the Ritz videos of him that night, but there could be an explanation for this which I will come to shortly. Only two days earlier, Paul had undergone a rigorous medical for the renewal of his pilots licence and there was no sign of the alcohol abuse the post-crash propaganda claimed. Quite the opposite. And there was another strange anomaly revealed by the ITV documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henri Pauls blood was found to contain 20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have been at a much higher level earlier because the carbon monoxide content halves every four to five hours once exposure to it has stopped. Haemoglobin carries the oxygen. Debbie Davis of the Carbon Monoxide Support Group said that with these levels in his blood, Henri Paul would not have known his left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain. Dr Alastair Hay, an expert on carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could not explain why Paul showed no signs of the considerable symptoms that should have been evident: I find it difficult to rational ise everything. A blood-carbon monoxide level of 20% and (a high blood-alcohol level) suggests this would be someone with a much slower reaction time, certainly be someone who would be slowed up in the way he did things, would probably also be somebody who was in some pain, but none of those things appear to be evident from the pictures that we see of him. It is a bit of an enigma.47 There is a lot more to know about Henri Paul. His best friend, Claude Garrec, told the ITV documentary that Paul had contacts within the French and foreign intelligence services and maintained them throughout his time at the Ritz. This is no surprise because the intelligence agencies recruit the security men at the top hotels and the Ritz, with its VIP clientele and reputation for espionage and arms dealing, would have been a prime target. Paul certainly had unexplained sources of income. He earned about £20- 25,000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of flying time at about £300 an hour. He had a string of bank accounts. There were two in a bank outside Paris and three accounts, plus a safe deposit box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near the Ritz. He had three accounts at the nearby branch of Barclays and one current and four deposit accounts at the Caisse DEpargne de Paris. In the eight months before the crash, sums of £4,000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In total he had £122,000 (1.2 million francs) and no-one knows where it came from. Then there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours between 7pm when he went off duty and 10pm when Dodi called him on his mobile phone and told him to return to the Ritz. His whereabouts in this period are a mystery. A very significant one. To understand how the Brotherhood operates requires immensely detailed research over a vast array of interconnecting subjects. Everything from ancient history, to Satanic symbolism and ritual, the Earths magnetic grid, the power of the Sun, the banking system, and mind control. The journalists who have produced the articles and documentaries about the crash came to the subject cold and they can never uncover the truth because they dont understand what they are dealing with. Their vision of possibility is limited by their indoctrinated view of reality. They cant see, for instance, that there are organisations within organisations which means that one force can work through apparently unconnected agencies like British and French Intelligence, the Paris police and medical services, and the inquiry investigating the cause of the crash. I mean, you dont have to search far for evidence of that. Look at the Kennedy assassination for one. It is this lack of research of the big picture that leads reporters like Martyn Gregory on the Dispatches programme to state categorically that there is not a shred of credible evidence to support the conspiracy theory and that the suggestion of Prince Philips involvement was ludicrous. I wonder after reading the evidence which you think is more ludicrous: the idea of a plot to kill Diana or Martyn Gregorys statement? It was an unfortunate comment in a programme that produced some good information about Al Fayed. Then there was the investigation into the crash by John Stalker, the former deputy chief constable of Greater Manchester, in the News Of The World newspaper, in which he dismissed all idea that Diana was murdered. Ironically, Stalker claimed, quite rightly, that he was the victim of a conspiracy to remove him from the police force after he identified a policy by the Northern Ireland police, the RUC, to shoot people they believed were terrorists and ask the questions later. This was the so-called shoot-to-kill policy. Pushing aside every suggestion of a conspiracy to kill Diana, Stalker asked: Why would the French want to cover up the murder of an English woman?48 The naivety of that statement is so breathtaking, I need a glass of water. At the same time, Stalker did ask some pertinent questions about the crash and its aftermath: Why was the Fayed security around the princess reduced to one wholly inadequate man with no back up? Why did the police not appeal for help from the public? Why was there no post mortem-autopsy on Dodi Fayeds body? Answers: because of the very conspiracy you dismiss, Mr Stalker. One of the most important subjects to research if we are to understand how Diana was killed, is the power and potential of mind control. Ill give some examples. In the 1980s the best part of 30 scientists working in top secret projects, mostly computer programmers, died in very strange and unexplained circumstances. Marconi was the major company involved, but there were others like Plessey and British Aerospace. In 1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from London to Bristol, a city with which he had no connection, and threw himself off the famous suspension bridge there. A few months before, Arshad Sharif, a computer programmer with Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and hanged himself. Why Bristol? It is a former Knights Templar port and its name has evolved from Barati, the Phoenician goddess. It just so happens that an elite unit of British Intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there and they use the runway at the British Aerospace complex to fly British and foreign agents in and out of the country. I was called once, from what sounded like a plane, by a guy claiming to represent the CIA. He said he was flying into the British Aerospace runway to sort me out. The Company (CIA) are not happy, he said. Oh, I thought, I am sorry, I do hope they cheer up soon. I drove over to meet him just to check it out, but he didnt show. He was probably a guy who needed help, or perhaps they were seeing how I would react to threats. Either way, they got the airport right. In that period in the 1980s, not only in Bristol, there were strange deaths galore of people at the cutting edge of development in the defence industries. What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the Bristol Suspension Bridge, and jump off? This may seem a long way from the Diana assassination, but its not. Im talking about mind control. A CIA scientist told me that he was put through forms of mind control to stop him recalling his knowledge once a project was completed. Ill give you an example of mind control in a situation very similar to the one in Paris. David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working in a very sensitive area of defence, but at 37 he was talking about leaving the industry and changing his lifestyle. He was happily married with two small children, a son aged six and a three year old daughter. Sands and his wife had just returned from an enjoyable holiday in Venice when he died in mysterious circumstances. Although they are not so mysterious if you understand mind control. He worked for Easams who, in turn, were operating contracts for the Ministry of Defence. It appears that while Sands and his wife were in Venice, the company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the Special Branch. Then, on Saturday, March 28th 1987, David Sands told his wife he was going out to refuel the car, but he didnt return for six hours. No-one has any idea where he was, but I think I do. His wife, Anna, called the police and constable John Hiscock was at the house when Sands returned at 10.2Opm. Asked the obvious question: Where have you been?, he said that he had been driving and thinking. His wife said that it was out of character for him to be away for so long and she didnt think he realised how long he had been out. He seemed confused, but happy, she said. Two days later, on Monday, March 30th, he climbed into his excellently maintained Austin Maestro and began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester, to Easams at Camberley in Surrey. His wife said there was nothing unusual about his demeanour or behaviour and driving conditions were good. But about 30 minutes into the journey when David Sands was driving along the A33 at Popham, near Basingstoke, he suddenly did a U-turn across the duel carriageway and headed at high speed in the opposite direction to his destination. Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour, Sands then drove his car straight into a disused cafe building killing himself in an explosion of flame. There were no skid marks. He had not even tried to stop.49 It is so clear that during the time he was missing, his mind was being programmed and all it took was a trigger word, sign, sound or action, and the programming was activated. At that point he would have switched from his normal self to a man focused only on driving into the cafe building and blowing himself away. The subconscious programming overpowers the conscious mind and robot replaces human. That, I am convinced, is what also happened to Henri Paul in Paris. Sands went missing for six hours before he drove into the cafe. Paul went missing for three hours before he drove into the 13th pillar in the Pont de UAlma tunnel. This is what I suggest happened in Paris. The Brotherhood networks were working through many people and agencies to ensure that Diana was in Paris that night because, at its foundation, the plan was to perform a specific Satanic ritual and the timing, circumstances and the place of death had to be arranged in intricate detail. Diana was under Al Fayeds security web for much of the time leading up to the crash and all of the time in those last few days. Her conversations were heard and monitored throughout by the Al Fayed bugging system. During his missing hours, Henri Paul,432 the asset of French and British Intelligence, was being programmed for his role, or perhaps the final touches were being put to programming already installed. Dianas ritual death was arranged from the very top of the Brotherhood and, by comparison, people like Al Fayed are small and powerless nonentities, pawns in the game they probably do not fully understand. The Mercedes which was brought to the rear entrance of the Ritz had been stolen some weeks earlier - before the Diana-Dodi relationship began - and when it was recovered it underwent extensive repairs. It had been standing outside the exclusive Taillevent restaurant when the drivers door was flung open and the chauffeur pulled out by three Arabic-speaking men with hand guns. The vehicle was missing for two weeks and when it was found the wheels were missing, the door ripped off, and the electronic system and equipment controlling the braking system had gone. Al Fayed, as we have seen, controlled the company, Etoile Limousines, which supplied the vehicle. No wonder the French authorities turned down the offer by experts from Mercedes to examine the car after the crash. When Henri Paul came back on duty that night he seemed his normal self to most observers. The programming was deep within his psyche still waiting to be activated. He may well have had a couple of alcoholic drinks in the Ritz bar, but his intake and demeanour did not correspond with the later medical report. Claims that he was an alcoholic also do not match with the examination of his liver. But if, as I suggest, Henri Paul was a mind controlled multiple he could have been drunk in one compartment of his mind and not in another. I have heard from recovering multiples who have experienced this. Someone close to Paul that night, his handler, was switching his compartments. In this way he could have had a considerable level of alcohol in his blood while, in some compartments, he would have been unaffected by it. The same with the carbon monoxide. Just before or just after the Mercedes pulled away from the Ritz, Henri Paul was given the trigger which activated the programming. It could have been a sound, a sign, a colour or more likely a word or sentence. With Pauls subconscious programming now overwhelming his conscious mind, he sped away to the Place de la Concorde and down the dual carriageway to the Pont de UAlma. Rees-Jones put his seat belt on, but apparently did not alert Diana and Dodi to the danger. Thus they stay unbelted. As Paul entered the Pont d LAlma tunnel at an estimated 80 miles an hour (some reports say slower), he braked fiercely, scraped the right hand wall of the tunnel, and then aimed the car at the 13th pillar. It is the 13th pillar that gives it away. The Brotherhood throughout history has had such an obsession with the number 13 that to believe this was a coincidence is taking chance to the level of fantasy. There must be 30 pillars in that tunnel and the car hit the 13th because it was meant to. Diana had an aversion to the number 13 and she would not allow a 13th lot in her dress auction at Christies the June before she died. If, as some witnesses have suggested, the crash was caused by the Mercedes hitting a white Fiat Uno or by a motorcyclist flashing a powerful light into Pauls eyes from a motor cycle, there is no way he could be sure of hitting the 13th pillar. But a person with a deeply programmed subconscious would be able to put the car right on the button, even at speed.433 Mark Phillips is the man who helped to deprogramme Cathy OBrien when she was a mind controlled slave of the CIA. He has worked in these fields for much of his adult life and after I reached my conclusions about the events in Paris, I rang him to ask if it would be possible to mind control Henri Paul to pick out that pillar at speed. Mark was in no doubt: Yes, Yes he said More than yes, absolutely yes. He pointed out that the subconscious worked much faster than the conscious mind and to the subconscious 80 miles an hour would actually be quite slow compared with its ability to think and react. If the speed was considerably slower as some reports suggest, it would have been even easier. There are many techniques they could have used to programme his mind during those three hours he was missing, Mark said. The number of ways they could have caused the crash, another vehicle, an explosive device, stun weapons, etc, etc, would fill a book and any of them is possible on the face of it. But not if they wanted to be sure of hitting the 13th pillar, which they did. To do that, they needed a driver with a programmed subconscious. I think the stories about the mysterious Fiat Uno and the motorcyclist with the flashing light are diversions to lead researchers away from the simple truth. So much time and effort has been wasted on the Fiat in particular, fueled by Al Fayeds own investigation team. Whenever such assassinations are staged, there are always a stream of false clues and leads which divert attention. The Kennedy assassination was full of them. Another possibility for the cause of the crash is external control of the car. Randulph Fiennes, famous for his polar expeditions, was an officer in the Royal Scots Greys and attached to the elite SAS. He wrote a book about a secret group of assassins called the Clinic and how they murdered people while making it look like an accident. The death of Major Michael Marman is particularly relevant to what could have happened in Paris. He was driving a Citroen 2CV along the A303 near Stonehenge in November 1986 when a BMW coming the other way careered across the carriageway and killed him instantly. Fiennes says that the BMW had been tampered with and the braking system was operated by remote control which could override the normal system via compressed air from a tiny scuba diving cylinder hidden in the engine compartment. The remote control equipment was operated from a Volvo which followed the BMW, Fiennes reported. The BMW was driven by Sir Peter Horsley, a retired Air Marshall, who survived the crash. Fiennes says that the Clinic knew that Horsley would be travelling along that road at the same time as their target. In his autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and as he was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. This is remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it struck the 13th pillar. Horsley was by now desperately trying to maintain control and he went on: Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation, mounted the grass verge separating the two lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous force. In a split-second the drivers horror-stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse scream.50 _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself with cool emoticons http://messenger.msn.co.uk

2 1

That "CUSTERD" promo single really does exist...
by Smiley 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

...so, firstly, sorry to nick king - who was the one that convinced me that this actually existed (as i was very sceptical). sorry mate! anyway, i tracked one down today, and now have in my hands this little beauty: Custerd - "Boom Bang Bombay" (one-sided 12" vinyl; Boom Boom Productions; CUSTERD 001) labels are 'custard' yellow (obviously), and have no info on them at all... ...however, it came with a press sheet, stating the following (exactly as written, so any mistakes aren't mine!). ***** Tracklisting: A. 'Boom Bang Bombay (We're Gonna Rock The Boat)' Only 75 copies mailed!! Boom Boom Productions hereby declare that the first release under seemingly posh exterior will be by the group sometimes known as Custerd. A triangular gathering featuring The Orb's huge and ever pulsating front man, Alex Paterson, Jamms & KLF Minister of Rock Jimmy Cauty & drunken Pink Floyd collaborator and musical expert Guy Pratt. 'Boom Bang Bombay' is a floor-spanking, mash-up of frontline funk and Bollywood shenanigans - a record for record's sake by the keenest collection of custerd tarts you're ever likely to meet. Taken from the unfinished album 'Ear Cake 5000', 'Boom Bang Bombay' is available in strictly limited helpings. Reactions essential & ASAP please!! ***** ...and, it's actually surprisingly good. on first play, i wasn't sure until it got 3-4 minutes in, but on second / third plays it's a real grower. i might even get around to doing an mp3 sample of it at some point in the near future, but don't hold yer breath as i'm amazingly busy at the moment. l8rs. --- Smiley

1 0

New sample spotted
by kubi 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

Hi there ! Found this one containing WTIL samples: Out Of The Ordinary - Play It Again (Los Ninos Mix).mp3 This one is not mentioned inside the discography, so I thought I could point it out here. I uploaded the file to http://www.kubarth.de/klf/ooto-pia.mp3 if you wanna listen to it. WTIL kicks in at around 5:22. kubi -- I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... ...and it was 24bit true color with 8bit alpha channel

1 0

Simon House
by John Milne 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

Who the fuck would want to live there? John

1 0

David Icke Joins The JAMS
by Tony Stuart 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

the reptilian nonsense that just gatecrashed this list seems to me a humourless, paranoid affair. this is more like it: http://www.headheritage.co.uk/uknow/features/?id=42 t -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

1 0

Re: [KLF] Why the "Illuminati"?4
by Simon House 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

It is possible that Dianas Mercedes was externally controlled in this way, because it is clear that the steering on Horsleys BMW was also remotely controlled. Certainly a highly skilled operator could direct the Mercedes into the 13th pillar. Support for the contention that no other car was directly involved in Dianas crash comes from Eric Petel who claims to have seen the crash. Petel says that he was riding his motorcycle towards the entrance to the tunnel when he was overtaken by the Mercedes. No other vehicle was nearby. He said: I saw a car in my rear-view mirrors flashing its headlamps. I moved across to let it by and it raced past even though I was doing about 70 miles per hour. An instant later I heard a deafening noise and saw the accident. The car was spinning in the road... I stopped. There were no other cars or bikes around at all and I could see all the way through the tunnel. The roof of the Mercedes was totally smashed in. The right hand rear door was partly open and I looked in and saw a woman. She seemed to have been thrown forward from the back seat and had her head between the front seats.51 Petel said blood was flowing from her right ear and as he brushed her hair from her face and placed her head on the arm rest, he realised it was Princess Diana. Her eyelashes were fluttering, but she had not opened her eyes at this stage, he said. Petel estimates he was at the scene for about a minute before climbing back on his bike to ring the police. He told them that Diana had been in an accident, but they laughed and told him to stop wasting their time. In despair at this, he rode to the police station in Avenue Mozart. His lawyer, Antoine Deguines, says that Petel was kept waiting for 25 minutes and taken into a backroom where he was handcuffed. For reporting an accident? When eventually freed, he was told to follow a police car to another police station where he gave a statement which he signed without reading. I was outraged he said They didnt seem to care about the crash. He heard nothing from the authorities for months before he enlisted help from a lawyer to tell his story to the official inquiry. Whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things happen. The person named as responsible is a patsy or scapegoat, most often these days under mind control, and diversions galore are created to lead investigators away from the truth of what happened. The first method allows you to make an immediate arrest, or expose the person to blame, and no further investigations are necessary because everyone knows who was responsible. We have seen this technique with Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Timothy McVeigh, and now Henri Paul. It is endless. The second method, the diversion, ensures that the crucial hours and days after the event are wasted as people chase a mass of false stories and leads .This was a technique used in Paris with the paparazzi, the435 flashing lights from motorcycles and later the Fiat Uno. Also when people are fed a constant barrage of conflicting reports and theories they become confused and a confused mind switches off and loses interest. So first they tell you the paparazzi were to blame, then they were not. Then they tell you the car speedometer was found stuck at 120 miles an hour, then they say it was found on zero. I thought it strange how many American witnesses to the crash were quickly located. The Pont and Place de LAlma were not, before Dianas death, a popular tourist area. There is nothing there except a restaurant or two, a tunnel, and a maze of crossing roads. And yet at 12.25 in the morning, several American tourists say they witnessed what happened. The number of witnesses in general was unusual anyway, given the late hour and the fact that Paris empties at that time of year as vast numbers of Parisians take their annual holiday to the French coastal resorts. I can understand that some people in the few cars travelling along the road at the time may have seen the crash and its immediate aftermath, but I know from visiting the spot myself, that the main pedestrian routes have virtually no view of the tunnel at all. The police failed to control the crash scene according to normal police procedure and so much evidence was lost immediately. They failed to question important witnesses and leaked some information while maintaining unshakable secrecy over other areas of the investigation.52 It all stinks. Today there is an added challenge for would-be assassins and assassination plots with the traffic cameras that are located all over cities. Smile, youre on TV. It would be impossible to keep secret the methods and personnel used to kill Diana if the whole thing was being videoed. But when you are the Brotherhood with connections at the highest levels in politics, police and intelligence agencies, the traffic cameras present no such problem. You simply switch them off! There are 17 traffic cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont de LAlma, including those inside the tunnel itself. If they had been working that night there would be no mystery, because you could play back the whole event on your television set. One camera looks down on the entrance to the tunnel and would have recorded any Fiat Uno or men on motorbikes with flashing lights. But that camera, like all the others, was switched off at the crucial moment. Never before in Paris had the whole system malfunctioned at the same time and the police refuse to explain what happened. The system runs on an independent power supply and it is controlled by the police and, ultimately, by the French Intelligence agencies, because the cameras are there to monitor far more than just traffic problems. At the same time as the camera system failed all the police communication frequencies in central Paris also went off. Simon Reagan in his excellent book, who Killed Diana?, quotes a contact called Andre who, like many people, loves to listen in to police radio messages. Andre was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes walk from the Pont de LAlma, on the night Diana died. He was, as usual, using a receiver to monitor the police communications. But suddenly, at 12.2Oam, all the lines went down. There was a radio blackout. It lasted for 20 minutes and then, Andre said, the signal came back and there was a mass of radio traffic as people all wanted to talk at once. I have never... come across such chaotic radio traffic, he said. It was extraordinary.436 When the lines went down Diana was leaving the Ritz on her last journey alive. By the time they came back she was lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the emergency team and according to the autopsy report within a few minutes of clinical death. And there is not a shred of credible evidence for a conspiracy, is there, eh? My God, its in our face. But within ten days of the crash, the French police had produced a 350 page preliminary report which assumed it was an accident and they did not consider any other possibility. Now, talking of that emergency team brings me to another vital point. As a contact on the fringes of British Intelligence told me, causing the crash is easy for the powers involved, but you cannot be sure of killing your target. Therefore you have your people controlling the medical team because, although your target hasnt died, there is now a credible reason for them to die. There has been a crash. The medical teams job (or those in charge, anyway) is to make sure that the target does not survive, no matter what condition they may be in to start with. Even those who dismiss the idea that Diana was murdered have questioned the astonishing delay in getting her to hospital when, according to the official medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required urgent surgery. The doctors say that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart and this was filling her lungs with blood. Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to death, if that is correct. The only way her life was going to be saved with such an injury was through immediate surgery. So why was it more than an hour and a half before she arrived at the hospital? Within a minute of impact, Doctor Frederic Mailliez with an American friend Mark Butt, drove into the tunnel from the opposite direction. A private investigator I know has made extensive inquiries into Mailliez and Butt and, while these investigations continue, his findings strongly suggest there is more to both of them than we are being told. The crash happened at 12.25am and by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run across to the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive and had rung the emergency services. This man must be a seriously quick worker. He is one of 160 Parisian doctors who are on constant call for emergencies in hospitals and private homes as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins. He had treated accident victims many times when he was a member of SAMU, the French emergency ambulance service. And yet a doctor on constant call for emergencies says that all he had in his car to help Diana was an oxygen cylinder and mask! Mailliez was in control of Diana and her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers, the SAMU emergency team, arrived to take over. He claims that Diana did not say anything to him, but this contradicts his comment to the London Times that She kept saying how much she hurt as I put a resuscitation mask over her mouth. Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard, also says he had flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back of the car: First its a groan. Then Dodis name was called... And that can only be Princess Dianas voice he told the Daily Mirror.53 How reliable that statement is, however, is open to debate. What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious or at least semi-conscious when Mailliez arrived. He told the CNN chat show host, Larry437 King, that: She looked pretty fine. At the beginning... from the outside, you know, she looked pretty fine. But inside, you know, the internal injury was already starting... Its really funny. Thats the only part, where she was sitting, thats the only part which was still intact. Mailliez on one hand told a French medical magazine that: I thought her life could be saved and yet said another time that It was hopeless. There was nothing we could do to save her. He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed woman in the world, and the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in the tunnel, he had no idea that she was Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the following morning. Excuse me? The pigs are airborne again. When the emergency team arrived, Malliez says he left the scene because there was nothing more he could do. The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she was trapped in the wreckage. This is a lie, lie, lie. One of the ambulance crew told the French newspaper, La Parisien, that when he arrived Diana was lying with most of her body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. She was agitated, semi knocked out, but conscious... she was groaning and struggling feebly. She murmured Oh my God several times. The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on September 11th 1997, established that Diana was removed from the car shortly after the fire brigade arrived and the excuse of her being trapped does not stand up. Another official excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood transfusion. This is another lie, lie, lie. SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion equipment because they would not know the victims blood type. When the ambulance did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles an hour and some reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles (6km) to the La Pitie-Salpetriere. Four other hospitals quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for delicate interventions, one of them within sight of the hospital. Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere about 2.lOam, an hour and 45 minutes after the crash happened. By any medical criteria whatsoever this delay was utterly ludicrous, unless it was meant to happen. It doesnt take a genius to see why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been no inquiry into the medical response that night. Waiting at the hospital were a surgical team headed by Professor Bruno Riou, the duty surgeon who, we are told, first heard about the crash while doing his rounds. Is it only me that finds it strange that a renowned surgeon is doing his rounds in the early hours of the morning? Waiting with him when Diana arrived were Professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, Professor Alain Pavie, a chest and heart specialist, and Professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon. They had been in telephone communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout. We are told they opened Dianas chest cavity, repaired the vein, and battled to save her for an hour and a half before admitting defeat. I find this remarkable, also, because the autopsy report apparently shows that Diana was clinically dead at 12.45am while still lying in the tunnel. She would therefore have been clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before she even arrived at the hospital and for three hours before the professors walked out of the operating theatre to announce that she had died. Having the body examined at a location you control is vital in such assassinations. President Kennedys body was flown immediately out of Dallas to the Brotherhood-front, the Bethesda Naval Center near Washington DC, for the post mortem. Here the presidents brain went missing (or his look-alikes did) and, as the US Assassination Records Review Board revealed, the autopsy notes and the first draft of the post mortem were burned. So who was behind Dianas assassination? It is important to stress that those who gave the order and those who did the deed would be very different. We are looking at a Brotherhood here, a spiders web, and while the order will have come from the spider or spiders in the centre, it will have been mostly carried out by the flies. It is highly unlikely that it would have been done directly by British Intelligence because that would be too obvious. Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to put them at arms length from the incident and to allow them to plausibly deny that they were responsible. For instance, there is considerable evidence that President Kennedy was shot by members of an elite rifle team within a renegade unit of French Intelligence called the OAS, or at least that they were involved in the plot. Olof Palme, the Bilderberger Prime Minister of Sweden, was murdered in Stockholm in 1986 on the orders of, among others, George Bush. But the killing was carried out by members of BOSS, the South African Intelligence agency (see .. And The Truth Shall Set You Free). The British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad called Group 13 (that number again) and British Intelligence has a long and sick history of political and economic assassinations. British Intelligence consists of MIS (Military Intelligence 5) which is responsible officially for domestic security, and M16 which deals with overseas matters. MIS announced in 1988 that they do not assassinate people. No, they get others to do it for them. This pathetic denial was prompted by the revelations of the former MIS agent, David Shayler, that M16 had organised a plot to assassinate Libyas Colonel Gaddafi. The attempt had failed because the bomb was put under the wrong car. Shayler was head of the Libyan Desk at MIS and was in the perfect position to know. Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, who is so far out of his depth he needs a frogmans suit, said that he had been assured that no such event took place. Oh, thats OK then. The attorney-general banned David Shayler from appearing on the ITV programme, Diana - Secrets of the Crash, and later Shayler was arrested and jailed in Paris awaiting extradition to London. Why do that if what he is saying is such nonsense? Because, of course, hes right. By the way, the oath of allegiance by British Intelligence officers is not to the government, but to the monarch. It is the same with Members of Parliament and the military. Ultimately the Queen is their boss under the law, although, in truth, their boss is whoever controls the Queen because even she is not at the top of the pile. The type of organisation most likely to have been involved in Dianas death, at the operational level is typified by the Pinay Circle or Le Cerde which has a number of British establishment figures in its ranks. Le Cerde is an offshoot of the even more elite Safari Club, which was set up by Count Alexander de Maranches, the Director during the 1970s of the French Service for External Documentation and Espionage. It was the Safari Club which arranged for the alliance between a French Intelligence front-439 company called Group Bull and the computer giant Honeywell which is, you will be surprised to know, the worlds biggest manufacturer of landmines. This alliance supplied landmines to both sides in the Bosnian conflict. The Safari Club began as a consortium of the secret police of the Shah of Iran called SAVAK, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been involved in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in arms trading and supply. Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle or Le Cerde, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay, who attended the first Bilderberg Meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954. Others involved with Le Cerde included the Habsburg family. To give you an idea of its make up and range of influence, the Le Cerde membership has included Nicholas Elliot, a department head at M16; William Colby, a former director of the CIA; Colonel Botta of Swiss Military Intelligence; Stefano Della Chiaie, a leading member of the Italian Secret Service; Giullo Andreotti, the former Italian Prime Minister from the notorious P2 Freemasonry Lodge and the man who gave the Mafia official protection; Silva Munoz, a former minister for the fascist, Franco, in Spain and a member of the Elite secret society, Opus Dei; Franz Josef Strauss, the German defence minister; and Monsignor Brunello, an agent to the Vatican. In America, one of the Le Cerde fronts is the CIA-backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Look at the potential for such an organisation to be the coordinating force between countless different agencies and countries all to achieve a common aim. The Safari Club-Le Cerde network provides the Arab-British-French connection necessary to arrange for Diana to be in Paris at the right time, the security for her to be withdrawn, the assassination to be carried out, and those involved to get away with it. What was that John Stalker said? Why would the French want to cover up the murder of a British woman? It is also interesting that Simon Regan in his book, Who Killed Diana?, says that it was Le Cerde which destablised the Gough Whitlam government in Australia in 1975. The Queen was certainly involved in that, too. As I explained earlier, it was her Governor of Australia, John Kerr, who removed Whitlam in the end. If the Windsors and Le Cerde worked together to bring down an elected Australian Government, why could they not have worked together to eliminate Diana? Paris, with its immense Brotherhood associations going back centuries, has long been a favourite location for their murders and plots. Amschel Rothschild from the English branch of the family, was murdered there in his hotel room in 1996 in what some claim to have been part of one of the inter-Brotherhood wars which have littered their history. For an organisation like Le Cerde, or its many mirrors in London, it would have been easy to place its people in the right places. Mohamed Al Fayeds security operation is awash with former members of elite British military and police units who know the consequences of saying No to the Brotherhood, even if they dont wish to be involved. In the same way, these spider structures ensure that their people control the inquiries into their assassinations, as they did most famously with Kennedy. Even Mohamed Al Fayeds personal investigation into Dianas death was headed by Pierre Ottavoili, a former chief of the Criminal Brigade, the criminal investigation department440 of French Police. This is the same organisation which is also responsible for the official investigation. Al Fayeds chief lawyer in Paris is a former French Justice Minister, and in overall charge in London is John Macnamara, his head of security and a former Chief Superintendent at the headquarters of Londons Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard. In the Spring of 1998, Macnamara was part of a sting operation involving the FBI, CIA and possibly, the Israeli (Rothschild) Intelligence Agency Mossad, to arrest a former CIA agent Oswald Le Winter, a 67-year-old American born in Austria. Le Winter contacted Al Fayed claiming to have documents for sale proving the involvement of M16 and the CIA in Dianas murder. He was asking $10 million and after a meeting with Macnamara he was given an advance of $15,000. A further meeting was arranged in Vienna, Austria, for the key documents and the rest of the money to be handed over. In the meantime, however, Al Fayed called a friend in the FBI, who contacted the CIA. Le Winter was followed, spied on, and lured to the Ambassador Hotel in Vienna on Wednesday April 22nd, where with support from the Austrian police a combination of FBI, CIA and possibly Mossad agents pounced on him. All this for an alleged hoaxer? The story would have remained secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on the Kurier newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when Le Winters hotel room was searched, four documents, two of them in code, were found and appeared to be genuine CIA documents. The CIA have since admitted tapping Dianas phone calls in, and to, America and passing the contents to British Intelligence. Le Winter was arrested and held in custody. Groligs story forced Al Fayed to admit that it was true. So was Le Winter trapped by such an array of international security personnel because he was selling a hoax to Al Fayed or because he was selling the truth? Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident. Richard Tomlinson, a former agent of Britains M16, gave evidence to the French inquiry into Dianas death. In 1997 Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the Official Secrets Act for trying to sell his memoirs. In August 1998 he was arrested again, at gun point, in Paris at the request of the British Government who were concerned at his association in that city with the MIS whistle-blower, David Shayler, who was also arrested and jailed in Paris.54 Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in charge of the inquiry, that Diana was murdered. According to a report on the BBCs news service, Ceefax, on August 28th 1998, he told the judge that Henri Paul was an asset of British Intelligence and so was One of the bodyguards. Which one was not named. Meanwhile Herve Stephan, a Brotherhood placeman, is doing all he can to hold the line that it was an accident. The most important question to ask when you are trying to identify those responsible for a crime is: Who benefits? As the Roman wnter, Seneca, said: He who most benefits from a crime is the one most likely to have committed it. Well the Windsors benefited magnificently. No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction of the Monarchys credibility and public esteem with her actions and her knowledge of their secrets. No longer is she there to bring her influence on the upbringing and attitudes of the future king, Prince William and his brother Prince Harry. The Windsors now have441 complete control of them, to mould them into their image. They couldnt do that before because Dianas influence was too strong and I hope the memory of that will encourage the princes to withstand the indoctrination. The way is now paved for Charles marriage to Camilla Parker-Bowles without the complication of Diana and, of course, his royal duty to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer genes, although as we shall see, William might not be his child. Understandably, it has been suggested that Diana was killed because of her campaign against landmines. This is not true, not directly anyway. The landmine manufacturers have done very nicely from her campaign, because they make far more money from clearing mines than they do making them. A mine costs about £30 to produce, but at least £3,000 to clear. Clearing all the mines around the world is estimated at £330 billion. No, the landmine manufacturers like Honeywell were not against Dianas campaign, they loved it for their own reasons. But what she showed very clearly was the power she had to take an issue from the shadows and hurl it into the public arena. The question could well have been: What will she do next?. And what was it that Diana had to reveal, as she told my contact, that would Shake the world? Henry Kissinger, one of the greatest Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century, met Diana a number of times and sickeningly attended her funeral. He said in an interview after her death that: She was politically and diplomatically uncontrollable. That is Kissinger-speak for Thats one reason she was killed. From the perspective of the operational level of the Brotherhood pyramid, as with Kennedy, there were many reasons why they wanted her dead. But, as I keep emphasising, that is only one level. At the top are the Elite black magic adepts, the reptilian full bloods and crossbreeds. At the highest level of the Brotherhood, Dianas death, like Kennedys, was a ritual killing. It was long planned for the effect it would have on the people and the magnetic field of the Earth, and to symbolise the introduction of the New World Order. Dont underestimate the fantastic power of ritual and symbolism in affecting the human psyche and the planets magnetic field. These people are not obsessed with it for no reason. Also a lot of this info can be confirmed by other sources. If you doubt any of this at least research it. _________________________________________________________________ Worried what your kids see online? Protect them better with MSN 8 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental&pgmarket=en-gb&XAPID=186&DI=1059

1 0

Re: [KLF] Why the "Illuminati"?2
by Simon House 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

I started calling him in London because at this time I was expecting his arrival in a day. I called his private line, but there was no answer. So then I called the secretary and asked to speak to him and she wouldnt put me on. So Mohamed got on and in so many horrible words told me to never call back again. I said Hes my fiancee, what are you talking about? He hung up on me and I called back and the secretary said dont ever call here again, your calls are no longer to be put through. It was so horrible.37 Ironically, Diana used to have Kensington Palace swept for listening devices and now she was in the clutches of a man for whom bugging was an obsession. The Al Fayed villa in San Tropez was bugged, as were all Fayed properties. Everything Diana said could be heard. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security at Harrods, said that the bugging there was A very extensive operation and was also always under the direction of Al Fayed.38 Henry Porter, the London Editor of the magazine Vanity Fair, had spent two years investigating Al Fayed and he said they came across his almost obsessive use of eavesdropping devices to tape telephone calls, bug rooms, and film people. Through mutual friends, Porter warned Diana about Al Fayeds background and activities Because we thought this was quite dangerous for her for obvious reasons39 But Diana apparently felt she could handle it and although she knew Al Fayed could Sometimes be a rogue, he was no threat to her, she thought. He is rather more than a rogue and rather more often than sometimes. She apparently told friends: I know hes naughty, but thats all. The Dispatches programme said they had written evidence that Al Fayed bugged the Ritz Hotel and given his background and the deals that are hatched at the Ritz, it would be staggering if he did not. Kelly Fisher said that the whole time she was in Fayed property she just assumed everything was bugged. It was known, she said, and Dodi had told her everywhere was bugged. She went on: As a matter of fact, when I confronted him about Diana, he said: I cant talk to you on the phone. He said Ill talk to you in LA. I knew what that421 meant. Diana was under the protection of the Al Fayed security machine and even her most private conversations were being monitored. Diana went with Dodi to Al Fayeds Elizabethan-style mansion called Barrow Green Court at Oxted in Surrey, formerly owned by the Satanist Lord McAlpine. Throughout the house Al Fayed had placed statues of semi-naked Greek goddesses. On August 21st, despite Henry Porters warning, Diana returned again to San Tropez for another holiday with Dodi. Al Fayed was milking the situation, briefing journalists and photographers and enlisting the advice of publicist Max Clifford.40 The Al Fayed machine was leaking the couples whereabouts to ensure maximum publicity. Al Fayed complained after the crash that photographers and journalists would not leave the Princess alone, a statement which, in the circumstances, beggars belief. The Diana-Dodi romance was now in full swing and Al Fayed was urging his son to intensify the relationship.41 And what Al Fayed said, Dodi did. Nothing was left to chance. Dianas favourite music, the theme from The English Patient, was played over and over as the couple cruised on The Jonikal. Diana and Dodi had much in common. Both had been born into wealthy families and their fathers were distant figures. Both had experienced the breakdown of their parents marriages as their mothers left home. They even attended finishing schools close to each other in Switzerland. But we should not rule out the possibility of mind manipulation techniques being used on both parties. I have met a number of former mind controlled slaves who were programmed to fall madly in love with someone they normally would not even like and there are endless examples of love spells concocted by black magicians to cause someone to fall madly in love with them. My scientist friend, Brian Desborough, tells me that the feeling of being in love is dependent upon the brain producing phenylethylamine. This is a chemical which also diminishes the ability to discriminate effectively, hence the term love is blind. Production of this chemical is sustained by the release of endorphins, a naturally occurring chemical linked to memory, learning, pain suppression, sex drive and hormone regulation. If these chemicals could be stimulated in both parties they would fall instantly in love. I think there is a very good chance that something like this happened as the sting was set up for both of them. There was talk of engagement in the air, but it is impossible to say how imminent that was, because reports conflict. I have great doubts about that myself. Diana and Dodi left the South of France from Olbia Airport at 1.3Opm on August 30th bound for Paris on Al Fayeds Gulfstream jet. They apparently intended to stay one night at Dodis apartment, which looks out on the Arc de Triomphe, before going on to London where Diana was due to meet her sons. It was to be her last full day alive. The plane touched down at Le Bourget Airport in Paris at 3.2Opm and they were met by 20 or so celebrity photographers known as the paparazzi (from an Italian word meaning buzzing insects). A Mercedes was waiting for the party and a green Range Rover was to follow on behind. This is normal security procedure and the very minimum you would expect to protect someone so globally famous. With Diana and Dodi in the Mercedes was Dodis bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, the 29-year-old former member of the elite British military regiment, the Paras or Parachute Regiment. Along with the SAS, the Paras are the most highly trained (and therefore mind controlled) regiment in the British forces. In the Range Rover were the driver, Henri Paul, the acting Head of Security at the Ritz, and another bodyguard, Kes Wingfield. They drove from the airport to the Villa Windsor on the Bois de Boulogne, the former home of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. The Duke and Duchess lived there after the duke, as King Edward VIII, abdicated the British throne when the government and establishment would not accept his marriage to the America divorcee, Wallis Simpson. They then moved to Paris as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. Their house is now owned by Mohamed Al Fayed and it is said that he was going to give it to Dodi and Diana as a wedding present. This talk of a wedding, however, is unsubstantiated, much as Al Fayed has sought to promote it. His publicity machine led the public to believe the couple had spent time at Villa Windsor discussing decor, but the bodyguard Kes Wingfield said that they only stayed there for Around ten minutes.42 From here they were driven to the Ritz Hotel where they arrived at 4.20pm. The Ritz is in the Place Vendome and all around that square at first floor level are symbols of the Sun and the cross, very much like the symbols used by the ancients to symbolise the journey of the Sun through the year which I featured earlier in the book. This was the symbol of King Louis XIV, who was known as the Sun King. At his palace at Versailles in the 17th century he decorated rooms in honour of Apollo, the Sun god, and Diana, the goddess of the Moon. There was also a statue of the goddess Diana at Versailles. In the centre of the Vendome Square is an immense pillar with a statue of Napoleon on the top and it mirrors the famous Nelsons Column in Trafalgar Square, London. At this stage Diana still had the same level of security that shed had since the airport, but this could have been increased considerably if support from the French High Protection Police Security Service (SPHP) had been requested. It is there to protect VIPs visiting the city, but a request for their services must be made. It wasnt. All Dianas security was provided by Al Fayeds people from start to finish. If they had enlisted the protection of the French police, Diana would still be alive. When a celebrity like Madonna visits Paris, the French Police have one car in front of hers and another behind, together with two motorcycle riders front and back of the motorcade. The cars are driven by trained drivers and they carry armed security men. According to reports, the SPHP made three, possibly four, offers to protect Diana, but each one was refused by Dodi. Was he, himself, under instruction to reject these offers from someone to whom he could not say no? An officer of the SPHP told Dodi: If you will not use our car, we recommend that two police cars accompany you on your excursions around the city.43 This advice, too, was ignored. Diana and Dodi went straight to the $6,000 a night 18th century Imperial Suite at the Ritz. From there, Diana rang her friend, the Daily Mail journalist Richard Kay. She told him she intended to retire from public life in November and he said that he had never heard her so happy. The couple booked a table at the Chez Benoit restaurant for 8.45pm and they intended to spend the night at Dodis apartment. At 6.3Opm Dodi went across the Place Vendome to a jewellers, Repossi, to buy a diamond ring for Diana which was later delivered to the Ritz. A little after 7 pm, the couple were driven in the Mercedes along the Champs Elysees to Dodis apartment on Rue Arsene-Houssaye close to the Arc de Triomphe. Here they unpacked and prepared for dinner. Again the back up Range Rover was there and so was another car carrying bodyguards for added protection. Why was this level of security thought necessary in the early evening, but not in the early hours of the morning at the time of the crash? Dodis apartment is known as the Etoile flat after the Place de LEtoile, the Sun or star circle road around the Arc de Triomphe. The route they took to the apartment was out of the Place Vendome onto the Rue de Rivoli, and half way around the Place de la Concorde they turned right onto the Champs Elysees and drove straight up that famous avenue to Dodis apartment (see Figure 52). Remember that route, it is crucially important. As they arrived at the apartment at 7.1 5pm, bodyguards were seen to rush from their car to hold back six paparazzi. Diana and Dodi became concerned about eating at the unprotected Chez Benoit restaurant and decided to head back to the Ritz to eat. They took the same route back, down the Champs Elysees and around the Place de la Concorde. The couple, with bodyguards Wingfield and Rees-Jones, walked into the Ritz, captured by the now famous video pictures, at 9.47pm. As the paparazzi gather in numbers outside, amid rumours of an engagement announcement, Diana has already started the last three hours of her life. Who was feeding the rumours and the whereabouts of Diana during the day to create the paparazzi stampede that dominated Diana and Dodis movements and decisions that night? I think I can guess, somehow. Al Fayed. And who were some of these paparazzi making life uncomfortable for Diana, thus changing the plans for the evening? The Ritz security video also identified a number of people who had been outside among the onlookers for most of the day and were still there on the edge of the crowd.44 Now the plot seriously thickens. After speaking on the phone with his father at his estate in Oxted, Surrey, Dodi Fayed announced a quite ludicrous plan. To avoid the paparazzi, the Mercedes which had been transporting them all day together with the back up Range Rover were to be taken around the front of the hotel and used as a decoy for the paparazzi. At the same time another Mercedes would be brought around to the back entrance of the hotel to whisk the couple away to the apartment on the Champs Elysees. Henri Paul, the 41-year-old acting head of security at the Ritz, was called on his mobile phone by Dodi and told to report back to the hotel. He went off duty at 7pm and by the time he returned it was 10pm. No-one has established where Paul was in those three hours. Dodi said that his father, Mohamed Al Fayed, had personally authorised that Henri Paul should drive the Mercedes. For me, that is Dodi-speak for My father told me this is how it is going to be. Henri Paul was not a qualified chauffeur and had no hire car permit. L. Fletcher Prouty, a former colonel in the US Airforce who worked closely with the intelligence agencies, once said: No-one has to direct an assassination - it happens. The active role is played secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions?45 Absolutely right. If we apply Proutys rule to Diana and ask who had the power -and used that power - to reduce the usual security precautions for her that night, we have a rather interesting answer: Mohamed Al Fayed. Given these circumstances he must answer the obvious question: Why was this security reduced? When President Kennedy was assassinated, there were no bodyguards standing on his car while four were standing on the one immediately behind (see picture section). He was also in an open-topped car at a dangerous time in a dangerous city. When Martin Luther King was shot dead at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4th, 1968, the black police officer in charge of security for King was sent home against his will hours before the shooting. The only two black firemen at the station next to the motel were sent to other stations just for that day. The scapegoat for this assassination was a guy called James Earl Ray. Not even Kings family believed he was responsible. So much so that they attended his funeral a few years ago. When Bobby Kennedy was murdered after making a speech at the Ambassadors Hotel in Los Angeles on June 4th 1968, again the security arrangements were tampered with. The plan was for Kennedy to walk off the stage and through the crowd to the exit. But immediately after the speech, Kennedys aides, especially Frank Mankiewicz, insisted that it was safer for him to go out through the hotel kitchen. When he walked into the kitchen he was met by the mind controlled Sirhan Sirhan with a gun in his hand. It is far more425 likely that Bobby Kennedy was actually shot by members of his security team, particularly Thane Eugene Caesar, the security guard who was employed at the last minute and had endless connections into far right groups and the intelligence community. But with Sirhan Sirhan at the scene with a gun, they had a mind controlled scapegoat to take the rap and that was all they needed. Sirhan Sirhan had been on a mind expansion course with the Rosicrucians in the weeks before he was implicated in Kennedys death (see .. .And The Truth Shall Set You Free). Frank Mankiewicz, who guided Kennedy to the kitchen, was a former public relations man for the Mossad-front in America, the Anti Defamation League. He turned up later as head of publicity for the Oliver Stone film, JFK, which claimed to be an expose of the assassination of President Kennedy. It wasnt. When the Israeli Prime Minister, Zitzhak Rabin, was shot dead by an assassin in Tel Aviv in 1995, an extraordinary video taken by an onlooker showed how Rabins security detail stepped back in unison to leave the assassin alone and free to kill his target. You can see the pattern. And what happened in the crucial last minutes of Dianas life? They withdrew her security on the orders of Mohamed Al Fayed via his son. That is a fact. All day she had travelled in the same Mercedes with the Range Rover as a back up vehicle. Now she would transfer to another Mercedes with no back up support whatsoever. This was an extraordinary decision for a man obsessed with his own security. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security at Harrods, said: Compared with the protection that Al Fayed affords himself, which is very professional, of a very high standard, that which was afforded to the mother of the future King of England was a Mickey Mouse operation.46 He added that Al Fayed was absolutely paranoid about his personal protection. Just for him to walk around his own store, there would be three or four plain clothes members of his personal protection team who travelled with him all the time, plus another four uniformed security who would act almost as outriders to create two rings of security around him. Thats in his own store! But is it paranoia, or the knowledge of the seedy, cesspit, world of arms dealers and Brotherhood fixers of many kinds, in which Al Fayed constantly operates? People who think nothing of the mass murder of children, let alone the assassination of a wealthy yes man like him. Dodi Fayed was obsessed with his security for the same reason. A lot of this security was also inspired by the size of Al Fayeds ego, to be fair. Mostly he recruited his body guards from the SAS and the Parachute Regiment and used the Brotherhood operation, Control Risks, to make recommendations. Tom Bower tells in his book about Al Fayed of how armed guards at the Oxted estate hide behind bushes wearing full combat uniform and blacked out faces. Whenever Al Fayed travelled in his Mercedes there was always a back up Range Rover carrying emergency medical equipment and security staff, but now he withdrew that protection from Diana. More than that, a new car was introduced for her, another Mercedes was sent to the rear entrance of the Ritz, supplied by a car hire company called Etoile Limousines, the same name as Dodis flat. Etoile Limousines is426 based at the Ritz and depends for its entire income on contracts with the hotel and its guests. In other words, it is controlled completely by Mohamed Al Fayed and whoever controls him. The new Mercedes was an S-280, lighter in weight than the 600 series they had used all day and without the dark tinted windows. Other cars were available, but this one was chosen instead. A director of Etoile, Niels Siegel, told the inquiry into Dianas death that he delivered the car to the rear entrance of the Ritz, but the Dispatches programme showed that this is a lie. It was delivered by a driver called Frederic Lucard and he can be seen doing so on the security video. Lucard said he found it very strange that Etoile would allow Henri Paul, a man not qualified as a chauffeur, to drive one of their cars. So why did they do it? Because Mohamed Al Fayed told them to, thats why. Brian Dodd, the former Head of Security for Al Fayed in the 1980s, gave his assessment of the situation to Dispatches: _________________________________________________________________ Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends http://messenger.msn.co.uk

1 0

Re: [KLF] Why the "Illuminati"?
by Simon House 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

The Spencers are an Elite bloodline family. They are cousins of the Spencer-Churchills and related to the Marlborough family at Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire, where Winston Churchill was born. As Elite families go, the Spencers are an important bloodline and Diana was related to countless aristocratic lines, including the Earls of Lucan. Further afield the Spencers have blood ties with many leading American families and they are distantly related to the Rockefellers. They have a long history of serving the monarch and the tradition continued with Dianas father. He was equerry to King George VI (who was married to the Queen Mother) and to Queen Elizabeth. Dianas sister, Jane, is married to Sir Robert Fellowes, the Queens Private Secretary at the time of Dianas death. Both of Dianas grandmothers, the Countess Spencer and Ruth Lady Fermoy, were inner circle members of the Queen Mothers court, as were four of her great aunts. The Spencers and the Queen Mother were very close and it was Lady Fermoy and the Queen Mother who manipulated Diana into her marriage with Prince Charles. This could be most significant when you hear about the true nature of the Queen Mother. The countdown to the marriage began when Diana met Prince Charles at Althorp while he was having a relationship with her sister Sarah, in 1977. Diana was 16, but it was three years later that the Windsors really made their move on her. With the Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy manipulating behind the scenes, she was invited to a dance at Buckingham Palace to celebrate Charles 30th birthday. Then, in July 1980, a friend of Charles, Philip de Pass, asked her to stay with them while the Prince was there. In Dianas own words, Charles was all over her and He leapt on me practically. He asked her to travel with him to Buckingham Palace the next day and an invitation followed to join the Windsors in the September at Balmoral, their residence in Scotland. Eventually Charles asked her to marry him and she accepted. I love you so much Diana said to him. Whatever love is Charles replied.23 That is such a telling statement about the Windsors and the way they bring up their children. They dont understand love because they give and receive so little. Imagine being a young child and having to line up with everyone else to shake your mothers hand when she returned from an overseas visit. That is how the Queen and Prince Philip treated Charles. Diana was a kindergarten nanny when the story of the relationship broke in the media and her life in the public eye and the constant spotlight had begun. So had her nightmare with the Windsors. Looking back, Diana could see that Charles had never been genuine in his affection for her. She realised even before the wedding that he was having a relationship with his real love, Camilla Parker-Bowles, and this continued and grew during their marriage. Charles and Camilla communicated using the code Gladys and Fred. Camilla, like the Windsors, is close to the Rothschilds and on the first anniversary of Dianas death, she was on the lonian island of Corfu enjoying the hospitality of Lord Jacob Rothschild.24 He has also spent £16 million leasing and restoring the Spencers 18th century mansion overlooking Green Park in London, close to Buckingham Palace.25 The Windsors wanted Diana to produce heirs with Spencer genes and that was all she was to them: an incubator. A week after her engagement to Charles, her bulimia began. This is an eating disorder in which you make yourself sick every time you eat food. Diana was throwing up three or four times a day and became desperately thin. As I mentioned in an earlier chapter, many victims of childhood sexual and Satanic abuse suffer from bulimia later in life. She said that the bulimia was triggered when Charles put his hand on her waist and said Oh, a bit chubby here, arent we? Bulimia is a disease of the emotions, as most diseases are, and Diana was in emotional turmoil even before the wedding. She described the attitude of Charles like this: Hed found the virgin, the sacrificial Iamb, and in a way he was obsessed with me. But it was hot and cold, hot and cold. You never knew what mood it was going to be, up and down, up and down... He was in awe of his mama, intimidated by his father, and I was always the third person in the room.26 She met her sisters and told them she couldnt go through with the marriage, especially with Camilla still on the scene, but they said she had no choice because Your face is on the tea towels and youre too late to chicken out. Before the wedding, Diana stayed at Clarence House, the London residence of the Queen Mother. When she had arrived no-one was there to welcome her, she said, it was like going to a hotel. Diana and Charles were married in St Pauls Cathedral on July 29th 1981. That morning at Clarence House she said she felt calm, deathly calm: I felt I was a lamb to the slaughter. I knew it, and I couldnt do anything about it.27 What prophetic words those would prove to be. They spent the first night of their honeymoon at the Mountbatten family estate at Broadlands in Hampshire before sailing around the Greek islands in the royal yacht Britannia (Barati). The bulimia got worse and she considered suicide, such was the scale of her unhappiness. My husband made me feel so inadequate in every possible way that each time I came up for air he pushed me down again. I hated myself so much. One of Dianas royal duties in 1982 was to represent the Queen at the funeral of Princess Grace of Monaco, another victim of Brotherhood murder when the brakes on her car failed. Princess Grace, formerly the actress Grace Kelly, ran the Monaco branch of the Order of the Solar Temple with Jean Louis Marsan, the close friend of her husband, Prince Rainier. The Windsors got what they wanted when Prince William was conceived. Diana was told that the birth had to be induced to fit in with Charles polo playing programme and the blond-haired, blue-eyed William was born on June 21st 1982, the summer solstice. Now first of all, what kind of father and husband insists that his wife and son be given needless drugs to suit his polo diary? And secondly, does anyone believe that was really the reason? The Windsors are obsessed with astrology and the esoteric arts to such an extent that the psychic-astrologer mother of an Irish friend of mine could predict with uncanny accuracy the colours the Queen and Queen Mother would be wearing every day. She was correct again and again because she knew the colours connected to each day according to esoteric law. A family so steeped in Satanism, the esoteric mysteries, and the Sun cult, induce the heir to ensure he is born on the summer solstice, when the Sun is at the peak of its power, and thats just a coincidence? No way. He was christened William (after the Black Nobility William the Conqueror) Arthur (after the Sun God symbol, King Arthur) Philip (after the Duke of Edinburgh) Louis (after Louis Mountbatten). Williams first serious girlfriend, according to the British press, was Emma Parker-Bowles, the niece of his fathers lover, Camilla. Prince Harry was born in September 1984 and Dianas usefulness to the Windsors was over. Then suddenly as Harry was born it just went bang, our marriage, the whole thing went down the drain, she told Andrew Morton.28 Diana and Charles separated in 1992 and divorced on August 28th 1996. Almost exactly a year later she was dead. Diana lived in apartments at Kensington Palace or KP as she called it. Prince Michael of Kent, the Grand Master of English Freemasonry, has his home there, also. The Brotherhood-Windsor machine attempted to destroy Dianas credibility and public esteem. A tape of an intimate telephone conversation between her and the car dealer, James Gilbey, was released through the media in 1992. On the tape Diana said that Charles was a real torture. She told Gilbey: Ill go out and conquer the world, do my bit in the way I know how and leave him behind. But despite, perhaps because of, the efforts to discredit her, Dianas popularity continued and grew. Her unique combination of a big heart, a global public profile, and an intense desire to settle a score with the Windsors, threatened the very survival of royalty. Her natural compassion and empathy with people were putting the emotionless Windsors in the shade and exposing them as out of date and irrelevant. The naive, shy 19-year-old, who was enticed into the Windsor web, was now a woman who was realising her true power and was prepared to use it. She took the issue of landmines from obscurity to the front pages across the world and she had the platform to do that with any subject she chose. To the Windsors and the Brotherhood, this lady was dangerous with a capital D. She also knew many intimate secrets of the Windsors and the establishment. She knew where the bodies were buried as they say, and she had shown in her famous interview with the BBC current affairs programme, Panorama, in November 1995, that she was prepared to reveal some of them. That interview, in which she talked of her unhappy relationship with the royal family in very forthright terms, did immense harm to the Windsors and they must have wondered what on earth she would do next. In my travels around the world I met a man who had a call from Diana in March 1997, a few months before she died. He was amazed when she said it was the Princess of Wales and he didnt believe her at first, especially when she said that she was calling from a supermarket phone in England. But Diana and this man had a mutual friend, and a close confidant of Diana told me that she often rang people from public phones, particularly from a department store in Kensingston, when she wanted to be certain the conversation would not be tapped. Diana admired this man for his wisdom and knowledge. She said she had something to reveal that would shake the world and she wanted his advice on how best to do it. He will not reveal what she told him, but when I said that I knew she was aware of the Windsors connection to global drugs trafficking, he said: Oh no, it was much worse than that. You might get an idea of what it could have been later in this chapter. Diana knew far more than people realise, as we shall also see. But that was only one level of the plot to kill Diana. At the highest level of the black magicians who control the Brotherhood networks, I have no doubt that her death had long been planned according to their ancient and deeply sick ritual. These two levels, the practical need to remove her (lower initiates) and the need for a ritual killing of the goddess Diana (highest initiates) would run side by side, exactly as they did with President Kennedy. The final sequence of events which led to her death involves, at almost every turn, a man called Mohamed Al Fayed, the Egyptian owner of Harrods, the top peoples store in Knightsbridge, London, and the father of Dodi Fayed who died in the crash with Diana. Al Fayed also owns the Ritz Hotel in Paris. This is the guy who bleats on and on about the need for truth and justice over the death of Diana and yet he would not recognise truth if it bit him on the bum. You can always tell when Mohamed Al Fayed is lying - his lips are moving. He fought a long, public, and vicious battle for control of Harrods and the House of Fraser with Tiny Rowland, the head of another Brotherhood front, Lonrho, the London-Rhodesia company, which has been responsible for so much manipulation of Africa and Africans. At one stage there was a Department of Trade and Industry inquiry into the Harrods takeover and it concluded: The lies of Mohamed Fayed and his success in gagging the press created a new fact: that lies were the truth and the truth was a lie.29 This would be a suitable epitaph for what Private Eye, the British satirical magazine and others, have dubbed: The phony pharaoh. The report also revealed that Al Fayed had lied about his family background. He had claimed to come from a wealthy Egyptian family and it was this money, he said, that he was using to buy Harrods. In fact he comes from a far from rich family and he didnt have any such money of his own. He was born on January 27th 1929 in Alexandria, the son of a school inspector. He sold Coca-Cola in the streets and later knocked on doors selling Singer sewing machines. It was an introduction to Adnan Khashoggi, now the worlds most famous arms broker, which changed his life. Khashoggi was the son of the personal physician to the King of Saudi Arabia and the Khashoggis employed Al Fayed (then Mohamed Abdel Moneim Fayed) in their business ventures. He later fell out with the Khashoggi family, apparently, and proceeded to lie his way through a stream of business deals which made him a lot of money from setting up deals for others and taking a commission. The construction company, Costain, was one of his main sources of income in the early days, but he made nothing like as much money as he claimed to be worth. See Tom Bowers book, Fayed, The Unathorised Biography, for the detailed background.30 Al Fayeds involvement with the Haiti dictator, Papa Doc, led to interest in his activities by the CIA. One CIA report on him remarked that: He strikes one as being friendly and evil at the same time.31 While he became wealthy by the standards of the rest of the population, he did not have nearly enough of his own money to buy Harrods and he used the wealth of the Sultan of Brunei, one of the richest men in the world. It was the Sultan who provided the money for Harrods and Al Fayed also acted for him in the purchase of the prestigious London hotels, the Savoy and the Dorchester. Al Fayed may act the big tycoon, but in the biggest game he is a gofer who takes orders and does as hes told. This is fascinating because we are led to believe that Mohamed Al Fayed and the Queen are on different sides and oppose each other over what happened to Diana. Funny, then, that Mohamed Al Fayed is subordinate to the Sultan of Brunei and the Queen of England is a friend of the Sultan of Brunei. She went to stay with him between September 16th and 20th in 1998.32 What is going on here? Al Fayeds most prominent sycophantic media poodle is the Daily Mirror which has acted as his personal newsletter. The Mirror made strenuous efforts to secure an interview with me in June 1998, despite my initial reluctance. But when I made my thoughts about Al Fayed known to the reporter, the article was dropped by the Editor, Piers Morgan, who personally conducts the Mirror interviews with Al Fayed. Doing as you are told by the very rich and powerful and using highly unscrupulous business methods, has proved extremely profitable for Al Fayed. He owns a fleet of bullet proof Mercedes, a £3.5 million Sikorski helicopter, a £13 million Gulfstream Jet, a £15 million yacht, The Jonikal, castles and 50,000 acres in Scotland, and expensive homes in Gstaad, New York, Dubai, Geneva, Gerona, London, Surrey and Los Angeles, all fully staffed and equipped.33 Balnagown, his Scottish castle, is close to Loch Ness. As long as he does as he is told and is useful to the Brotherhood his wealth will continue. If he doesnt - gone. They will hang him out to dry. Another418 source of income for the Fayeds, again interconnected with the Sultan of Brunei, is arms dealing. Al Fayeds former brother-in-law and Dodis uncle, Adnan Khashoggi, the infamous Saudi arms dealer and fixer, has arranged weapons sales, legal and illegal, worth multibillions of dollars. Many of the discussions for such deals take place at the Ritz Hotel in Paris owned by Mohamed Al Fayed (or the Sultan?). This is one reason why Al Fayed has the Ritz bugged to eavesdrop on his VIP guests. In fact, he has everything bugged, as well see. He is deeply involved in brokering arms sales and Dodi was often an unofficial broker for arms-for-oil deals between the Gulf states and America.34 Adnan Khashoggi is a close associate of George Bush and bankrolled part of Bushs Iran-Contra arms-for-drugs operation in the 1980s. George Bush, in turn, is a bosom buddy of the Queen and Prince Philip. Al Fayed is involved in many underground deals and plots involving events, people, and subjects that he is desperate to ensure remain secret. Certainly not a man to trust under any circumstances, in my view. I should emphasise, too, that the Islamic elite, like the Sultan of Brunei, are significant players in the Brotherhood pyramid and the Grand Lodge at Cairo is one of the most powerful secret society centres in the world. This is hardly surprising given the Brotherhoods obsession with ancient Egypt and its ritual and symbols. The reptilian bloodlines may be predominantly Aryan, but they are far from exclusively so. They work through streams within all races, the Arabs and the Jews most certainly among them. One of the predominant secret societies in the Arab world is the Order of the Mystic Shrine or the Shriners. They are connected to the Knights Templar, and the York and Scottish Rites of Freemasonry. Among their members in the United States have been President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his successor President Harry S. Trueman. There is also a Prince Hall Shrine for black members of the Brotherhood, including that self-styled spokesman for the black community in the United States, Jesse Jackson. Al Fayed has served the interests of the Brotherhood and the establishment in a number of ways while presenting an anti-establishment public profile. For instance it was he who exposed the two Conservative MPs, Neil Hamilton and Tim Smith, who were taking money to ask certain questions in the House of Commons. This is quite illegal. Al Fayed knew that this was true because he was the one giving them the money! This story did enormous harm to the Conservative Government and did much to help the Brotherhood chosen one, Tony Blair, to a landslide victory for the Labour Party at the following General Election. Al Fayed has also escaped prosecution so far for a growing number of allegations from young female members of staff at Harrods that he sexually assaulted them. His obsession with sex is legendary. One girl, 17-year-old Samantha-Jane Ramsay, said that when she complained to her supervisor that she had been groped by Al Fayed, the supervisor sighed: Another one. Al Fayed sacked her for making the complaint, as he does all those who speak out against his sexual molestation and style of business management. John Monks the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, said that at Harrods there was A regime of fear and terror. When Samantha-Jane took her complaint to the local Marylebone Police419 Station, she said that the officer told her: Youre not the first to come to us. We have files inches high on Mr Al Fayed, but no proof. It would be your word against his.35 A file inches high of different girls making the same complaint about the same man would, I suggest, constitute rather more than No proof. But Al Fayed, the man we are told the establishment would love to crush, survives untouched. So this is just some of the background to the liar, double-dealer, sexual molester, Satanist and Sultan of Brunei frontman, who had complete control of Dianas security in the days and hours leading up to her death. I wouldnt trust him with the security of my cat. Indeed, as Tom Bower has documented, Al Fayed has ordered his hit men to shoot a cat he didnt like. Al Fayed had become close to the Spencer family through Dianas father, Earl Johnny Spencer, and stepmother Raine. He helped Johnny through financial difficulties and said he considered the Earl to be a brother.36 He had given Raine, whom Diana couldnt stand, a place on the Harrods board. Al Fayed sponsored prestigious royal events like the Royal Windsor Horse Show and polo competitions, but he especially backed the causes and charities supported by Diana. Bob Loftus, the head of security at Harrods between 1987 and 1996, told the British Channel Four programme, Dispatches, in June 1998, that he was ordered to tell Al Fayed immediately if Diana came into the store. Al Fayed would then go to the department where she was shopping and accidentally meet her. Every Christmas a green Harrods van would call at Dianas home, Kensington Palace, with gifts for her and the boys from Uncle Mohamed. When you look at the evidence, he made it his business to court the friendship of the Princess of Wales in every way possible. On June 3rd 1997, he invited her to join him for a Summer holiday at his beach-side villa in San Tropez in the south of France. On June 11th he got the breakthrough he had been working so hard for: she accepted. The following day he completed the purchase of a £15 million yacht, The Jonikal, through his Bermudan company Mohafa Shipping, and it was on this boat that Dodi and Dianas romance was soon to blossom. On July 11th Diana arrived in San Tropez with her sons, William and Harry, to stay in an eight-bedroomed luxury apartment on the ten acre Al Fayed estate on the exclusive Le Parc development. At this time, Dodi Fayed was still at his apartment in Paris with his fiancee Kelly Fisher, the American model. The 41-year-old Dodi was a gofer for his father and lived on his fathers wealth, although he had enjoyed some success in the movie industry at one time as the hands-off producer of the hit British film Chariots Of Fire, again thanks to his fathers money. He had a playboy reputation and was a very big spender, once famously running up a $100,000 bill in two months on his Amex card. He was dominated by his father and even in his film operation every decision had to be approved by Al Fayed. Dodi did whatever his father told him to do. He had been engaged to Kelly Fisher for eight months and she was expecting to spend her holiday on The Jonikal. But on the evening of July 14th, Dodi took a phone call from his father who ordered him to go immediately to San Tropez to be with Diana. Kelly Fisher described what happened next in an interview with the Dispatches programme:420 (Dodi) said he was going to London and hed be back and then we were going to San Tropez. That evening he didnt call me and I finally got him on his portable phone. I said Dodi where are you? and he said he was in London. I said OK, Ill call you right back at your apartment. He said No, no, dont call me back. So I said Dodi where are you? and he admitted he was in the South of France. His father had asked him to come down and not bring me, I know now. Two days later Dodi sent a private plane to fly Kelly to San Tropez. But while he stayed with Diana, Kelly was kept aboard another Fayed boat. Im sitting here stuck she said. So he had me in my little boat cage and he was, I know now, seducing Diana. On July 31st, Diana returned to San Tropez for a second holiday with Dodi, this time alone. Kelly Fisher was back in Los Angeles preparing for her wedding to Dodi which she said was due to take place on August 9th. But two days before that, the story broke in the world media of the romance between Dodi and Diana. Kelly heard from a friend who saw a picture in the paper. She recalls: _________________________________________________________________ Chat online in real time with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.co.uk

1 0

Re: [KLF] Why the "Illuminati"?
by Simon House 19 Mar '03

19 Mar '03

i think it was extremely important that they did, whether the meant anything with it or not is another thing, but its a shame it didn't inspire people to go out and stop the evil bastards ruling the world and who are about to send 'us' into war, rather than chit chatting on the net! >From: "John Milne" <Highlandland(a)btopenworld.com> >Reply-To: "All bound for Mu-Mu Land." <klf(a)mailman.xmission.com> >To: <klf(a)mailman.xmission.com> >Subject: [KLF] Why the "Illuminati"? >Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:00:34 -0000 > >Something I've been ruminating over for a long time ... > >How do people on this list feel about Drummond and Cauty appropriating some >of the "Illuminati" imagery in their work, particularly at the very >beginning and the end of their recording careers? Isn't it the unfortunate >case that these sort of images and reference points can sometimes be open >to >misinterpretation (or be used by extremely nasty people)? When the KLF >were >on TOTP in 1991, even Anthea Turner mentioned that they looked "like The Ku >Klux Klan". It was merely a crass short-hand description of their druidic >outfits, of course. But I wondered what the views of other people on the >list are? > >John > >Not Scots, just Scott-ish > > >_______________________________________________ >KLF mailing list >KLF(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf _________________________________________________________________ Surf together with new Shared Browsing http://join.msn.com/?page=features/browse&pgmarket=en-gb&XAPID=74&DI=1059

1 0