May 2002 - USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

Anyone using the May release of v.92?
by WayneG 24 May '02

24 May '02

Is anyone using the May release of v.92 code?? Thank you, -Wayne. Wayne Griswold Network Administrator U.P.Log-On Internet Computer Connection U.P. 500 N. Stephenson Ave Iron Mountain, MI 49801 (906) 774-4847 (906) 774-0335 (fax) SysAdmin(a)uplogon.com

7 7

RE: [USR-TC] can't browse to some sites
by SWujek＠solunet.com 24 May '02

24 May '02

Hi Gen, Check your MTU settings, if you are using RADIUS then set the MTU to at least 1514. Thanks, Steve Solunet TAC -----Original Message----- From: Gen Camiling [mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:31 AM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] can't browse to some sites Any one experienced that when client dials into a Total Control chassis get connected and authenticated but cant seem to browse some site like www.google.com ? TC has HARC,HNMC,HDSP and Quads. -- Best regards, Gen ================================== Gen Camiling Chief Technical Officer International Micro Village, Inc. PHILIPPINES (63)(2) 7512130 mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph ================================== _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

can't browse to some sites
by Gen Camiling 24 May '02

24 May '02

Any one experienced that when client dials into a Total Control chassis get connected and authenticated but cant seem to browse some site like www.google.com ? TC has HARC,HNMC,HDSP and Quads. -- Best regards, Gen ================================== Gen Camiling Chief Technical Officer International Micro Village, Inc. PHILIPPINES (63)(2) 7512130 mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph ==================================

2 1

Shorthaul / Longhaul NIC setting on PRI Trunk
by WayneG 23 May '02

23 May '02

I noticed today that our PRI cards are set to "longhaul" under the Trunk Settings/NIC Type. Our smartjack is about 20 feet from the TC, so shouldn't these be set to "shorthaul"? Thank you, -Wayne. Wayne Griswold Network Administrator U.P.Log-On Internet Computer Connection U.P. 500 N. Stephenson Ave Iron Mountain, MI 49801 (906) 774-4847 (906) 774-0335 (fax) SysAdmin(a)uplogon.com

2 1

Setting Modem Grouping on the Hiper DSP
by Patrick Ndegwa 23 May '02

23 May '02

Hi there. I have a Hiper DSP (ver 2.1.9) card running together with a Hiper ARC (5.0.9). I need some pointers on setting up modem groups in such a away that they accept a maximum number of connections based on the called station ID (through DNIS). Cheers, Patrick Ndegwa --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com) Version: 6.0.362 / Virus Database: 199 - Release Date: 5/7/2002

2 1

NAT on HiperARC
by Gen Camiling 22 May '02

22 May '02

Does anyone in the list actually use the NAT feature of the HiperARC? Mind sharing the configuration and feedback on the said feature? -- Best regards, Gen ================================== Gen Camiling Chief Technical Officer International Micro Village, Inc. PHILIPPINES (63)(2) 7512130 mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph ==================================

1 0

Anybody need anything? I need Hiper NMC's...
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 22 May '02

22 May '02

List seems slow these days.... I am in the market for Total Control Hiper NMC card set. Paying TOP $$$$ Please send available Hiper Hardware to steverivera(a)wrca.net Anyone looking for Total Control Hardware? Total Control Hardware Prices are very attractive in todays slow buying market. DSP's $900 ARC's $800-$1000 Please inquire for NEW and REFURBISHED TOTAL CONTROL HARDWARE. Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax for more product info got www.wrca.net Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA)

7 8

Trunk Settings
by Seth Jacobs 19 May '02

19 May '02

We have two HiperDSPs in a TC rack and the second one suddenly stopped taking calls. When the first card filled up, callers would get a fast busy. The card in slot 1 works fine, the card is slot 2 gets fast busies when card one fills up. I was on the phone with several telco techs for several hours and they believe the lines are OK. I was upgrading the HiperDSP code about the time the problem occurred, and the card failed, so I thought it was related to that. I plugged in a backup card (just the NAC) into slot2 and the card came up and started taking calls. Which made me think the problem was related to the card. BUT, we are using PRI T1s, the phone company says they are using using NI2, and when I look at the trunk settings for the two slots they are identical except for: TRUNK SETTINGS: SLOT1 SLOT2 Jitter Attenuation attenJitterOnTxmtr attenJitterOnRcvr Primary Switch Type priSwNI2 priSw5ESS My question is whether the HiPer DSP can be set to the wrong primary switch setting and still work? Does the fact that the two different slots are set to different Primary Switch Types mean anything? Seth ---------------------------------------------------------------- Seth Jacobs, OnRamp113, 707-678-0267 voice 805 N. Lincoln, Suite D, Dixon, CA 95620 www.onramp113.com

4 4

Re: [USR-TC] Trunk Settings
by FIRST NOC TC Subscriber 18 May '02

18 May '02

Seth, >From my experience yes I have been able to have a PRI up and running configured as 5ESS even though the phone company has provisioned it NI2. Keep in mind that under every circumstance that I can think of NI2 is _not_ the way to go. If your phone company will allow you to request a change to 'custom', i.e. 5ESS assuming that's the type of switch serving it, then you should do that. Otherwise you should make sure and set all DSPs serving that particular area to NI2 to match what the telco has configured. At any rate, NI2 is not going to allow service messages, which makes a helluva difference when you attempt to busy out a single trunk or do some work on one PRI and expect it all to come up working again when you restore it to service. We have one particular area where Alltel will not provide us with custom settings - they are forcing NI2 upon us, and it makes it a real bear to manage the TC equipment under those conditions because we can't just busy out a single channel on a PRI and when we have to reboot/replace/reset a PRI we end up having to do this to every card in the chassis. Mike ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Seth Jacobs" <sjacobs(a)onramp113.com> Reply-To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 14:14:42 -0700 >We have two HiperDSPs in a TC rack and the second one suddenly stopped >taking calls. When the first card filled up, callers would get a fast busy. >The card in slot 1 works fine, the card is slot 2 gets fast busies when card >one fills up. I was on the phone with several telco techs for several hours >and they believe the lines are OK. > >I was upgrading the HiperDSP code about the time the problem occurred, and >the card failed, so I thought it was related to that. I plugged in a backup >card (just the NAC) into slot2 and the card came up and started taking >calls. > >Which made me think the problem was related to the card. > >BUT, we are using PRI T1s, the phone company says they are using using NI2, >and when I look at the trunk settings for the two slots they are identical >except for: > >TRUNK SETTINGS: > SLOT1 >SLOT2 >Jitter Attenuation attenJitterOnTxmtr >attenJitterOnRcvr >Primary Switch Type priSwNI2 priSw5ESS > > >My question is whether the HiPer DSP can be set to the wrong primary switch >setting and still work? Does the fact that the two different slots are set >to different Primary Switch Types mean anything? > >Seth > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >Seth Jacobs, OnRamp113, 707-678-0267 voice >805 N. Lincoln, Suite D, Dixon, CA 95620 >www.onramp113.com > > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > ________________________________________________________________ Sent via the WebMail system at 1st.net

1 0

AT Commands
by Noriega, Alejandro 16 May '02

16 May '02

Hello guys, could anyone give me an examlpe about an efficient Init String for HiPerDSP modems? I'd like to try to obtain that the connections to V.90 and V34 are made in the best possible way. Now this Init String is configured into my DSPs: > chdev mdm 255 mdm255> at&f1c10=0&w factory defaults mdm255> reboot > chdev mdm 255 mdm255> ats81=1s27=1s51=0v1&w Init String mdm255> reboo Thanks a Lot! Alejandro J. Noriega

1 0