October 2002 - USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

RE: [USR-TC] Question about handshaking.
by Joel - Fox Computers 01 Oct '02

01 Oct '02

Although this probably doesn't help any - by accident I found that my DSPs will negotiate a 2400bps connection in 4 seconds - I was really impressed until I saw the connect speed. -----Original Message----- From: Sergio Gonzalez [mailto:sagonzal@sky.net.co] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:29 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] Question about handshaking. *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hi everyone. I would like to know if someone here have been worked on handshaking delay optimization over quad-modem (Digital/Analog) or with the modems that come in the HiperDSP. I would like to know if there is a way to decrease the delay time during handshaking. I only need to make conections up to 19.2K. Any ideas will be welcome. Thanks a lot in advance for the help. Sergio Alejandro Gonzalez Director Operativo Network and Services Field Manager SkyNet de Colombia. Calle 100 No. 8A-55 Of. 711 Bogota, Cundinamarca Colombia, South America. Tel: 57 (+1) 6 422 020 Cel: 57 (+3)/(03315) 3551034 Pager: 5405555, 3469999 Cod 2010 _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

Question about handshaking.
by Sergio Gonzalez 01 Oct '02

01 Oct '02

*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hi everyone. I would like to know if someone here have been worked on handshaking delay optimization over quad-modem (Digital/Analog) or with the modems that come in the HiperDSP. I would like to know if there is a way to decrease the delay time during handshaking. I only need to make conections up to 19.2K. Any ideas will be welcome. Thanks a lot in advance for the help. Sergio Alejandro Gonzalez Director Operativo Network and Services Field Manager SkyNet de Colombia. Calle 100 No. 8A-55 Of. 711 Bogota, Cundinamarca Colombia, South America. Tel: 57 (+1) 6 422 020 Cel: 57 (+3)/(03315) 3551034 Pager: 5405555, 3469999 Cod 2010

1 0

Autoreply: RE: [USR-TC] about backup of flash image and dsp's code
by sjacobs＠onramp113.com 01 Oct '02

01 Oct '02

I will be out of the office from Tuesday, October 1 through Friday, October 4. I will respond to your message upon my return. Only this single auto-reply message will be sent, even if you send further messages. Seth

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] Modems Permanently Busy
by Joel - Fox Computers 01 Oct '02

01 Oct '02

FYI - I've had the HiperARC working with a V.34 Quad Digital/Analog with an Analog line into the back side of it. No other configuration seemed to work with though - and I think I've tried most possibilities. -----Original Message----- From: Todd Bertolozzi [mailto:berto@voyager.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:19 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] Modems Permanently Busy Ahh....analog modems. I don't believe the hiperarc supports analog modems. Think you need a netserve card. Not positive though. Todd -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin(a)mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Jason McCormick Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:49 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Modems Permanently Busy Thanks for the reply, but I don't have a T-1 card and I couldn't find an equivalent setting on either the HiPerARC or the NMC. I have TCM version 5.5 and it doesn't seem to be able to talk to the HiPerARC. I get an error of "Programmed Settings not supported for this card or version". I've been using TMC for configuring the NMC and the HiPerARC manager for managing the HiPerARC. I've done some messing around and I now have it to the state where the modems ring but do not answer now. The DIP switches on the analog cards are set to answer after 1 ring. -- Jason On Tuesday 01 October 2002 13:40, Todd Bertolozzi wrote: > I seem to recall a similar problem a long time ago when we used quads. It > may be that the ds0's aren't mapped to the modems. Take a look at this: > > Open Total Control Manager and follow these steps: > 1. Click on the entire T-1 card > 2. Click on configure > 3. Click on program settings > 4. Click on DSO<->Modem Configuration > 5. Select a DS0 in the left column that you want to map > Legend > a. Green Already connected (mapped) to a modem > b. Aqua Available > c. White Unavailable > d. Yellow Selected > 6. If the modem that you are trying to map the ds0 to is White > (unavailable), the modem may not be configured to have the line interface > source of t-1tdm. > Insure that the modems have a line interface source of t-1tdm: > a. Select individual modem > b. Click on configure > c. Click on program settings > d. Click on Line interface options > e. Verify that the line interface source is set to t-1tdm. > > Just a thought. > > Todd > > -----Original Message----- > From: usr-tc-admin(a)mailman.xmission.com > [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Jason McCormick > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:15 PM > To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com > Subject: [USR-TC] Modems Permanently Busy > > > Hi all. I have some USR total control parts that I've put together to > try to setup a remote dial-in pool. I have the following pieces: > > 1 Chasses w/ 45A power supplies > 3 Analog V.34 modems > 1 Network Management card (hardware version 2.0, software version 4.3.8) > 1 HiPerARC > > I've gotten everything configure but I'm running into an odd problem > whereby the modems are permanently busy. I've gone over the > configurationg numerous times and setup things according to the various > manuals for an "ISP" type setup (users dial in to obtain an IP, etc..). > Can someone help me troubleshoot this problem? I realize I haven't given > much information but please let me know what you need and I'll be glad to > post it ASAP. > > Thanks a lot!! > > -- Jason > > > _______________________________________________ > USR-TC mailing list > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > > > _______________________________________________ > USR-TC mailing list > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] Disconnect Issues
by Joel - Fox Computers 01 Oct '02

01 Oct '02

I see a few customers with crappy phone lines, crappy modems, or both that have disconnects (lost carriers). One time I did have the majority of my customers with disconnect problems and this was due to line coding being set wrong. My CT1's were originally set up with AMI line coding. I had put in an order to change to B8ZS. [I have very little understanding of telco things, but...] Apparently, to change that, the telco's switch has to be reprogrammed, something called a Soneplex has to be reprogrammed, an HDSL box had to be changed, and of course my equip had to be changed. The local telco tech saw the order and reprogrammed the Soneplex to b8zs while everything else was set for AMI. People could still get in, but most people were dropping off in less than an hour. Soon as I found it, he switched it back, everything worked fine. I would suspect line coding (or some other trunk setting) if you're seeing really bad disconnects. It seems that the most of the trunk settings make minor differences in quality, but only a couple actually cause it to work or not work when set wrong. Just my thoughts... - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Kris McElroy [mailto:kris.mcelroy@duracom.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:59 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] Disconnect Issues I have been experiencing frequent disconnects on a majority of my Total Control boxes. I am running Code 2.1.85 in a majority of my cities that are having issues. I upgraded one city to 3.5.12 and things just got worse. I read the archive and it mentioned 3.5.105 was working well. I can only download 3.5.100 from source, is it just as good? Furthermore is there any software that I can run to monitor the DSP modems to see what the deal is for disconnects or does anyone have pointers that I can check? Thanks, Kris McElroy kmcelroy(a)duracom.net Internet Systems Engineer Duracom, INC. www.duracom.net _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

Disconnect Issues
by Kris McElroy 01 Oct '02

01 Oct '02

I have been experiencing frequent disconnects on a majority of my Total Control boxes. I am running Code 2.1.85 in a majority of my cities that are having issues. I upgraded one city to 3.5.12 and things just got worse. I read the archive and it mentioned 3.5.105 was working well. I can only download 3.5.100 from source, is it just as good? Furthermore is there any software that I can run to monitor the DSP modems to see what the deal is for disconnects or does anyone have pointers that I can check? Thanks, Kris McElroy kmcelroy(a)duracom.net Internet Systems Engineer Duracom, INC. www.duracom.net

1 0

SMTP
by Jobe Bittman 01 Oct '02

01 Oct '02

I thought I recalled a thread a while back about how to redirect all SMTP traffic to a single ip on the TC1000. I can't seem to find the email now. Does anyone know how to do this?

1 0