September 2003 - KLF - mailman.xmission.com

Re: [KLF] anarchy
by Simon House 20 Sep '03

20 Sep '03

that is a shit hot book i reckon its one that needs a couple of reeds at least. I saw a disinformation video with Robert Anton Wilson talking for about a half hour on it, he's a fun-gi. He dont seem to like David Icke though so he cant be that on the ball, or maybe he just dont wanna admit it!? He probably thinks the KLF are shite too. > >Read "illuminatus!" if you haven't. Hagbard Celine shares many traits and >opinions with true anarchists, although he is by his own definition a >Discordian. You'll probably pick up a lot of new stuff you didn't realize >about the klf/jamms. > > >_______________________________________________ >KLF mailing list >KLF(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile

2 1

Satan ties up the Mumu Noise
by klf-communications＠arcor.de 20 Sep '03

20 Sep '03

If someone wants to hear that download it from RMStringer`s ftp. .../www.klf.jp.md (mh79)/CTRL vs ORBITAL - Satan ties up the Mumu Noise.MP3 http://www.klf.jp.md - Last Update 18.09.2003

3 3

[OT] Advice For KOL
by Martin Bradbury 20 Sep '03

20 Sep '03

A few words of advice for Kings Of Leon: 1) Put down your instruments and go home. 2) Cut your hair and shave ya facial hair you crusty scum. 3) Have a bath and buy some resectable fucking clothes. 4) Learn to fucking rock. For gods sake, I took one look at these scruffy scummy crusty hippie shit heards and thought this is the worst fucking band Ive ever seen, who would ever want to be like them? They make Starsailor look like Guns N Roses.

1 0

What Time Is Love
by Chris Peel 20 Sep '03

20 Sep '03

Anyone own copies of the blue and clear vinyl 004X releases? Anyone have an idea how many were pressed/where they were distributed? Cheers Chris ps, [OT]: A mate of mine put together the "exploding biro" from the cookbook. He tried it out (stupidly, on himself) and nearly lost three fingers. The nurses who treated him were particularly unimpressed, although we all had a good laugh at his pain.

3 2

Re: anarchist's cookbook
by our.webstuff＠verizon.net 19 Sep '03

19 Sep '03

> Basicly he was encouraging people to NOT to buy the book that he was > trying to get its publishing rights revoked, on the ground that he was > young and dangerous when he wrote it, but now he's older and wiser and > realizes how dangerous the contents it. > > I think that's good enough proof that anarchy is a fad for the young > blokes with no responsibilites of their own and alot of free time. first of all, the anarchist's cookbook has almost nothing to do with the theories and practices of "anarchy" it assumes (much like Loki, I guess) that all anarchy is is making and throwing bombs - as such, it could be called anything from "miner's cookbook" to "republikan's cookbook" (recall ann coulter's comment that the only thing timothy mcveigh, the accused bomber of OKC, did wrong, was that he didn't bomb the NY Times instead) the so-called anarchist's cookbook is not recommended due to the dubious (and dangerous) nature of its recipes

2 1

Re: gg allin
by our.webstuff＠verizon.net 19 Sep '03

19 Sep '03

> To be honest, the whole GG thing was a waste of time. The problem is > people like UNK, who try to over intellectualise the thing, its like > Jackass. You could theorise that and try to intellectualise it but at > the end of the day its a bunch of fucking retards acting like wankers. > And no, it isnt funny. kind of like this article? (which is funny) http://www.theonion.com/3936/top_story.html > The thing about GG is, he didnt matter (even I think that and Ive got > some of his cds). Nobody has heard of him and therefore he didnt raise > any serious questions or didnt pose a serious threat to society. Like > Chicken John said, all he attracts is the biggest losers on the planet > with the worst attitudes. that being said, chicken john IS a loser ("am I bleeding?") AND he has a really bad attitude there's no doubt that he attracted big losers with really bad attitudes (like geraldo rivera), but I don't think that's ALL he attracted (his school music teacher, for instance, or dee dee ramone) > I think that Dino is a fucking nut by saying somethin philosophical > like its a serious social statement on violence. As the guy at the end > of Hated said "Did we in fact learn anything". No we sure as fuck > didnt. I think it is a serious social statement, if for nothing else but to ask "what kind of society creates and lives with this person?" and to some extent, tolerates I think it also brings up a serious question of what lsd and its effects are on individuals, including their propensity towards violence remember, a friend described his first trip as him taking off all his clothes, screaming, and smashing stuff, which basically was his stage act I'm not suggesting at all that lsd causes violence - I don't think it does by itself - but it's always been a part of the gg allin story that's intrigued me

2 1

Re: "credibility"
by our.webstuff＠verizon.net 19 Sep '03

19 Sep '03

> I consider Coultier the right-wing equivilent of Moore. your perception may be that she is the right-wing equivalent moore, but she really isn't > Me being > republican has NOTHING to do with it. so you say > BOTH are on the extreme ends of > thier political perspective how can one be on the extreme end of their own perspective? - perhaps you mean, extreme TO YOUR OWN perspective? - in any event, you're wrong, coulter is considerably more extreme than moore as well > and I don't trust or hold people like that > to be credible. let me explain something to you: where one is on the scale of SOMEONE ELSE'S perspective (remember, you CAN'T compare someone to themselves!) has NOTHING TO DO with their credibility someone's (lack of) credibility is determined by how often what they say can be proved a lie repeat: however "extreme" one is has nothing to do with their credibility determining credibility is asking the questions: "how often is this person wrong? how often is this person lying?" credibility has nothing to do with where one is on the political spectrum and the fact is, regardless of political persuasion, coulter is considerably less credible than moore. in fact, I fail to see how "extreme" moore is at all? what is your definition of "extreme"? "undemocratic"? what views of moore's, in a democracy, can be held as "extreme"? I find nothing he says to be undemocratic in any way contrast with the very extreme and undemocratic coulter: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly - these are all things she has publicly and proudly rallied against! even if your definition of "extreme" isn't "undemocratic", I still fail to see how moore can be considered "extreme" in any way. if you wouldn't mind, how about giving me some examples of how extreme michael moore is (just because I'm beginning to question your "credibility")

1 0

Re: [KLF] RE: Anarchist Cookbook
by Simon House 19 Sep '03

19 Sep '03

i know someone who made the chem fert pipe which worked, and they are not dead though they nearly were! If anyone wants a copy of the cookbook give me a shout. > >According to reviews on Amazon.co.uk, you are >dicing with death just making that shit in that book. >Its supposed to be really volatile or something, its >supposed to be pretty suicidal. > >The first time I heard of this was a few months ago >after watching Bowling For Columbine on DVD. One >of the teenagers at a USA high school (I cant remember >which one, I dont think it was Columbine) was number 2 >on the potential bomb threat list because he made >napalm and stuff by following the book. > >"I swear that I dont have a gun" - K. Cobain >_______________________________________________ >KLF mailing list >KLF(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf _________________________________________________________________ Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband

1 0

RE: GG Allin
by Martin Bradbury 19 Sep '03

19 Sep '03

To be honest, the whole GG thing was a waste of time. The problem is people like UNK, who try to over intellectualise the thing, its like Jackass. You could theorise that and try to intellectualise it but at the end of the day its a bunch of fucking retards acting like wankers. And no, it isnt funny. The thing about GG is, he didnt matter (even I think that and Ive got some of his cds). Nobody has heard of him and therefore he didnt raise any serious questions or didnt pose a serious threat to society. Like Chicken John said, all he attracts is the biggest losers on the planet with the worst attitudes. I think that Dino is a fucking nut by saying somethin philosophical like its a serious social statement on violence. As the guy at the end of Hated said "Did we in fact learn anything". No we sure as fuck didnt.

2 1

RE: Anarchist Cookbook
by Martin Bradbury 19 Sep '03

19 Sep '03

According to reviews on Amazon.co.uk, you are dicing with death just making that shit in that book. Its supposed to be really volatile or something, its supposed to be pretty suicidal. The first time I heard of this was a few months ago after watching Bowling For Columbine on DVD. One of the teenagers at a USA high school (I cant remember which one, I dont think it was Columbine) was number 2 on the potential bomb threat list because he made napalm and stuff by following the book. "I swear that I dont have a gun" - K. Cobain

1 0