November 2002 - KLF - mailman.xmission.com

Re: KLF 12" Kylie Said To Jason + poster
by Dex 28 Nov '02

28 Nov '02

> Stuart Bruce <klf(a)atomiser.demon.co.uk> writes > >> > Also had Kylie said to Jason 12 - 10 > >> > >> Great price, fairly hard to come by. > > > >Probably worth more if it's got the poster? > > I've only seen it the once (which is the one that I bought for 50p brand > new and unopened). KLF 12" Kylie Said To Jason + poster look to: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1080&item=924180713&… but hurry for bidding it's only 45 minutes left !! also find this: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=924676748 Brilliant 12'' single - It's a man's man's man's world Enjoy Dex My name is Dex and they call me Sky Riding the waves with out heads held high We came from Atlantis on a burning shell with our 808 program to sell. -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup One click access to the Top Search Engines http://www.exactsearchbar.com/mailcom

1 0

RE: [KLF] Re: KLF digest, Vol 1 #328 - 4 msgs [BOLLOCKS]
by Stuart Bruce 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Kirk [mailto:peter@antimatter.co.uk] > Sent: 26 November 2002 21:02 > To: klf(a)mailman.xmission.com > Subject: [KLF] Re: KLF digest, Vol 1 #328 - 4 msgs > > > > From: "Stuart Bruce" <Stuart.Bruce(a)FameAcademy.endemoluk.com> > spouted: > > People subscribed to receive every message seperately > (which I think is = > > probably the majority) can set whether they receive > HTML-enabled or = > > HTML-removed e-mails. > > dear me, I didn't think there would ever be any KLF news that > one needed to > know NOW. Especially in the present climate. Poor people. There are other benefits to receiving individual posts over a digest, besides getting e-mails 'immediately'. Getting individual posts makes it easier to sift through them for the ones you actually want to read, easier to filter out messages from people you can't be bothered to read messages from (or filter out "[FTP]" messages- but that's never gonna really work is it?), keep the messages you might reply to later whilst deleting the rest, etc. etc. > > People who receive the digest, can't change this setting. > > Thats a bummer, seing as it them or rather us who have to > trawl through it > all in a big line. I'm afraid I do not feel your pain. > > Since digest readers are probably in the minority and are already = > > resigned to sifting through messages anyway, it's unlikely that a = > > consensus could be reached to avoid HTML on this list. > > Well not sending it would be a start, as has often been said, > there is no > reason to send html email. ever. Well, the fact that every time I log on at work my settings have been changed back to Rich Text, and I can't be bothered to change that setting every day since this is the only list I'm complains about it (I'm mostly on Yahoo Groups lists, which have better controls over whether you want HTML or plain text messages). So the simple solution is that I'll just unsubscribe from this list, on the grounds that the shit-to-interest ratio on this list is now far too high to be worth bothering with. Thank you and goodbye. Stuart. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com) Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 ______________________________________________________________________ Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ENDEMOL UK plc unless specifically stated. This email and the information it contains are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately and delete the copy you have received from your system. You should not copy it for any purpose, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents to any other person. If you suspect the message may have been intercepted or amended please call the sender.

3 2

RE: [KLF] Shag Times
by James Parker 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

i think he means the dreaded CD rot. Last time i checked mine they were all fine, but maybe i should get me ripped if they are likely to go. I bought Shag Times from Diverse Records in Newport in '91 so it was definately released to the shops. ------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail message and any attachment(s) are CONFIDENTIAL and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you should not read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information in this e-mail or any attachment(s). Please also e-mail, telephone or fax us immediately and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment, and we do not accept liability for any such corruption, interception or amendment or the consequences thereof. Please note that any views expressed in this email may be those of the originator and do not necessarily reflect those of this organisation. ----------------------------------------------------------- ____________________________________________ This OUTBOUND message from Frontline Limited has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service.

2 3

Off Topic MPEG Editing Tool
by mark weston 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

Hi, Please can anyone advise me of a good Freeware Editing programe. I wish to shorten a MPEG film (delete the last few minuits). If anyone has any ideas or a link to a download it will be appreaciated.. Regards Mark W.

3 2

RE: [KLF] [FTP] [RANT] [OFFTOPIC] [UNDULATING] [COGNITIVE] [PITCHFORK] [insert your own favorite word here]
by Stuart Bruce 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Touzimsky [mailto:thomas@klf.de] > Sent: 26 November 2002 22:37 > To: klf(a)mailman.xmission.com > Subject: [KLF] [FTP] [RANT] [OFFTOPIC] [insert your own favorite word > here] > > PS Are you in a bad mood since Katie left? > > I don't know wether this is serious or provocative, but I DO > KNOW that this > is a private matter and must not be spread across the list. Just to put Thomas' mind at rest, this is a reference to the TV program I'm working on (one of the contestants is called Katie and she was thrown out last week), not a personal relationship... Stuart. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com) Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 ______________________________________________________________________ Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ENDEMOL UK plc unless specifically stated. This email and the information it contains are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately and delete the copy you have received from your system. You should not copy it for any purpose, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents to any other person. If you suspect the message may have been intercepted or amended please call the sender.

4 3

Re: [KLF] [offtopic] msg delivery order
by Nigel Armstrong 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

One of the things about e-mail is that there is no guarantee that messages arrive in the order they were sent. This is especially true when multiple servers are involved. Yahoo must have quite a few servers dealing with their lists so it is to be expected that they get out of step. N.

1 0

OT: List guidelines (Was: KLF digest, Vol 1 #327 - 3 msgs)
by Per Bolmstedt 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

At 20:39 2002-11-26 -0000, Stuart Bruce wrote: > Since digest readers are probably in the minority and > are already resigned to sifting through messages anyway, > it's unlikely that a consensus could be reached to void > HTML on this list. Wrong. The majority of posters use plain text (review the archives!). Also, subscribing to the non-digest version does not remove HTML from mails. This is the list web page: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf Go there now and click on "posting guidelines" and you'll find the posting guidelines for this list. Here's an excerpt: * Avoid long signatures. * Trim down quoted text. * Move the quoted text above your reply. * Stay on-topic. * Avoid HTML, rich text, attachments and other non-text content. In other words, do what most people on the list do already and have done since 1992. To quote another poster: "A few lines of text in the RM Stringer original was 26K, after a couple of Stuart Bruce and RMStringer replies this had gone up to 40K". It's up to all of us to decide whether that's 40K of crap or 40K of content. If you feel that your non-text content like <div>,   etc adds something crucial to your postings, please explain why that is the case. Otherwise, follow the posting guidelines and please stop sending 33 kilobyte mails with only 300 bytes of content.

3 2

Re: KLF digest, Vol 1 #328 - 4 msgs
by Peter Kirk 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

> From: "Stuart Bruce" <Stuart.Bruce(a)FameAcademy.endemoluk.com> spouted: > People subscribed to receive every message seperately (which I think is = > probably the majority) can set whether they receive HTML-enabled or = > HTML-removed e-mails. dear me, I didn't think there would ever be any KLF news that one needed to know NOW. Especially in the present climate. Poor people. > People who receive the digest, can't change this setting. Thats a bummer, seing as it them or rather us who have to trawl through it all in a big line. > Since digest readers are probably in the minority and are already = > resigned to sifting through messages anyway, it's unlikely that a = > consensus could be reached to avoid HTML on this list. Well not sending it would be a start, as has often been said, there is no reason to send html email. ever. Peter

1 0

Live CD cover scan? was Re: [KLF] Server for the holidays....
by say.map＠ihug.co.nz 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

RMStringer worte: > Thanksgiving/Thanksgiving is login and pass. Well all I can say is, RMStringer can leave FTP out of the subject line anytime he wants and never earn my wrath for it because of the wonderful downloading service he is providing (as I type), thanks so much So is the cover of the Live CD online anywhere to print out? cheers

1 0

list netiquette: was: RE: [KLF] [FTP] Wanda MP's
by say.map＠ihug.co.nz 26 Nov '02

26 Nov '02

Stuart Bruce wrote: > Does it take a genius to put the letters "[FTP]" in the subject line of > FTP-related messages? clearly it does, and also it obviously requires a genius to a) post in plain text and not HTML and b) delete irrelevant quoted text and not just reply leaving everything in. A few lines of text in the RM Stringer original was 26K, after a couple of Stuart Bruce and RMStringer replies this had gone up to 40K. What a ******* waste of bandwidth. I say bring back the limit on quoted material! Stuey <HUGE BIG SNIP>

1 0