Re: RE: ikue mori interview - please participate
ahorton <ahorton@vt.edu> wrote: I'd really like to see a non-rude, non-confrontational yet honest question that goes something like this: "Ms. Mori, don't you feel that it's misleading to mask all of your musical endeavors with faux-highrbow language? You've simply used drum machines and samplers, and more recently MAX MSP, to make music- and yet, you insist on using lines like 'I extrapolate binary systems of sonic fragments to further explore the multiethnic diaspora', when in reality it would be more correct to say 'I bash buttons and make interesting beats." This isn't to accuse or to be hostile- i'm a huge fan of Mori's work- but I feel that her approach to explaining what she does is symptomatic of a real epidemic of faux-highbrow posturing in the modern improv world. If DJ Shadow's comfortable accounting for his genius with "I just bash the buttons on my sampler until it sounds dope", then surely someone like Mori (working in the same fashion) should be comfortable doing the same, without having to "talk herself up." I'm late on this because of a computer meltdown that's not quite fixed yet. Unless you've found a portal into Mori's head, you really have no idea what she thinks about when she's "bashing the buttons." Many (though certainly not all) people using max/msp have highly developed metaphoric structures for the patch system. Mori may be one of these people. If you're "a huge fan" of the music, I don't see why it should matter how Mori explains/describes/rationalizes her methods of creating that music. I can think of lots of work that I love for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with what the artist claims to be doing. And, to address David Beardsley's comment, I don't know of any composer/performers who got grants from the roughly 50 grant panels I've been on in the last 20 years who didn't have a very strong advocate speaking about what the work sounded like. Work samples are always weighted much more strongly than artist statements and project descriptions for the very reason that many artists, and not just in music, have difficulty describing what they do in a way that communicates as well as their art work does. I would suggest if you really do find Mori's explanations so offensive,and really do find the work so appealing, that you simply stop reading her liner notes and interviews and just listen the music. The music, after all, is the main point of what she does, right? Bests, Herb -- Herb Levy P O Box 9369, Forth Wort, TX 76147 herb@eskimo.com
Re: RE: ikue mori interview - please participate---- Original Message ----- From: Herb Levy
And, to address David Beardsley's comment, I don't know of any composer/performers who got grants from the roughly 50 grant panels I've been on in the last 20 years who didn't have a very strong advocate speaking about what the work sounded like. Work samples are always weighted much more strongly than artist statements and project descriptions for the very reason that many artists, and not just in music, have difficulty describing what they do in a way that communicates as well as their art work does.
Thanks Herb. I wasn't being totally serious! But I do understand that many artists have problems expressing themselves. Probably part of what drives their art in the first place. It's good to find out that decisions are made by listening instead of just evaluating applications. * David Beardsley * microtonal guitar * http://biink.com * David Beardsley * microtonal guitar * http://biink.com
participants (2)
-
David Beardsley -
Herb Levy