Klonk Fri, 13 Dec 2002 21:23:18 -0500 veschprigt mroktar "J.R." <jr_bloodsworth@usa.net> [re: Re: [Yello] FTP site, organizing]: Idea for file convention: artist_album_track-number_title.[ogg-q or mp3-kbps].extension various-artist-album_track-number_artist_title.[ogg-q or mp3-kbps].extension
I could definitely use the help from you all when it comes to judging the quality. :) Can Do. I commit to volunteer.
Good point. Check them for viri, trojans, and the like. Then dump them into the public directories. :) Ah, mp3, shn, ogg, mpg, avi... none of these file formats are /capable/ of carrying code, let alone a virus. Akin to getting infected by a jpeg. Never gonna happen.
Hands On La Habanera Oooooh! Cain't wait ta git mah grubby mits on them there!
Having the record label and the "part number" (not sure what it's actually called) of the record or CD could also help for those that already have a release. I'm a big fan of "full" filenames.
OH YEAH! ;) Enforcing, again, will be difficult. I sit on a T1 [pretending to "work"] and consider myself to be attentive to detail, as it were. I am happy to volunteer my time to sorting and renaming and auditing.
That could be rather tough to determine. Would we all base it on just sample rate, sound quality, or both? What I would consider middle, others may consider it something else: So use numerical instead of subjective indicators, as in my above suggested filename format.