Agreed theres probably little anyone can do about it at this stage, but to just dismiss the whole thing, blindly trust the government and financial captains, and take a "not rock the boat" attitude is so typical of the population of this state. I don't live in Tooele or Stansbury, but if I moved there for the skies I'd certainly be anti-growth. Even full-cut-off lighting contributes to light pollution, albeit to a lesser extent than uplighting, that just means you get to install more lights before the same pollution level is reached. Power must be generated for even "correct" lighting and this will contribute to increased air pollution for someone somewhere. Light pollution aside, where are the water resources for more growth going to come from? I refuse to put good "spin" on a bad situation but since most of you think Im dead wrong or tilting at windmills, I'm done with it too. Merry Christmas, and God Bless Us, Everyone! __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
participants (1)
-
Chuck Hards