Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be patrick
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up? From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be patrick _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call 3rd time will be the charm? patrick On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
Still can't figure what's wrong with a gentle landing in the ocean. From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call 3rd time will be the charm? patrick On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
Salt water doesn't play nice with electronics and light weight alloys. I'll wager the ATK modules that landed in the ocean needed to be beefed up for a considerable weight and cost penalty. DT From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video Still can't figure what's wrong with a gentle landing in the ocean. From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call 3rd time will be the charm? patrick On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options". _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
Some of the Shuttle boosters were reusable and required a lot of refurbishing, they maintain this is much more cost effective than the old. Sent from my iPad
On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:01 AM, daniel turner via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Salt water doesn't play nice with electronics and light weight alloys. I'll wager the ATK modules that landed in the ocean needed to be beefed up for a considerable weight and cost penalty. DT
From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Still can't figure what's wrong with a gentle landing in the ocean.
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call
3rd time will be the charm?
patrick
On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http:
Crashing on a barge is even harder on electronics. Why not a parachute landing in the Utah desert? Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Erik Hansen <zaurak@digis.net> wrote:
Some of the Shuttle boosters were reusable and required a lot of refurbishing, they maintain this is much more cost effective than the old.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:01 AM, daniel turner via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Salt water doesn't play nice with electronics and light weight alloys. I'll wager the ATK modules that landed in the ocean needed to be beefed up for a considerable weight and cost penalty. DT
From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Still can't figure what's wrong with a gentle landing in the ocean.
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call
3rd time will be the charm?
patrick
On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http:
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
The rocket motor is much bigger and heavier than Patrick Wiggins so it would need to have a parachute that was very much bigger than the two bed sheets that he uses. That's extra weight that needs to be carried aloft which means less payload going into space. Plus an landing on land needs to be softer than a splashdown at sea. So an even bigger parachute and even less payload going into space. They are trying very hard to lower the cost of putting payload into space. Things will have to be done very differently to achieve this. DT From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:45 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video Crashing on a barge is even harder on electronics. Why not a parachute landing in the Utah desert? Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Erik Hansen <zaurak@digis.net> wrote:
Some of the Shuttle boosters were reusable and required a lot of refurbishing, they maintain this is much more cost effective than the old.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:01 AM, daniel turner via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Salt water doesn't play nice with electronics and light weight alloys. I'll wager the ATK modules that landed in the ocean needed to be beefed up for a considerable weight and cost penalty. DT
From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Still can't figure what's wrong with a gentle landing in the ocean.
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call
3rd time will be the charm?
patrick
On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http:
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
Daniel must be spying on me. :) As it happens the chute I use the most is about the same square footage (that's how canopies are measured) as two king size bed sheets. But for the record the smallest canopy on the market today is smaller than a single twin size bed sheet. But getting back on topic, here are Mr. Musk's tweets about the landing. Also some videos showing just how close they came to pulling it off: https://twitter.com/elonmusk patrick On 17 Apr 2015, at 16:49, daniel turner via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
The rocket motor is much bigger and heavier than Patrick Wiggins so it would need to have a parachute that was very much bigger than the two bed sheets that he uses. That's extra weight that needs to be carried aloft which means less payload going into space. Plus an landing on land needs to be softer than a splashdown at sea. So an even bigger parachute and even less payload going into space. They are trying very hard to lower the cost of putting payload into space. Things will have to be done very differently to achieve this. DT
From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:45 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Crashing on a barge is even harder on electronics. Why not a parachute landing in the Utah desert?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Erik Hansen <zaurak@digis.net> wrote:
Some of the Shuttle boosters were reusable and required a lot of refurbishing, they maintain this is much more cost effective than the old.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:01 AM, daniel turner via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Salt water doesn't play nice with electronics and light weight alloys. I'll wager the ATK modules that landed in the ocean needed to be beefed up for a considerable weight and cost penalty. DT
From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Still can't figure what's wrong with a gentle landing in the ocean.
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call
3rd time will be the charm?
patrick
On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http:
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
There are no Oceans or Refurbishing facilities on the Moon or Mars, so you need a vehicle that can land, refuel, and re-launch, if you are going anywhere but earth. Landing on a barge in the ocean is just a lot safer than landing on land where people might get squished if something goes wrong. Just my thoughts. Jamie B "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except for bears, bears will kill you." _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
-----Original Message----- From: Utah-Astronomy [mailto:utah-astronomy- bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Joe Bauman via Utah- Astronomy Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:46 PM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Crashing on a barge is even harder on electronics. Why not a parachute landing in the Utah desert?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Erik Hansen <zaurak@digis.net> wrote:
Some of the Shuttle boosters were reusable and required a lot of refurbishing, they maintain this is much more cost effective than the old.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:01 AM, daniel turner via Utah-Astronomy <utah- astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Salt water doesn't play nice with electronics and light weight alloys. I'll wager the ATK modules that landed in the ocean needed to be beefed up for a considerable weight and cost penalty. DT
From: Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah- astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Still can't figure what's wrong with a gentle landing in the ocean.
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
But they got pretty close this time: http://aviationweek.com/space/video-falcon-9-close-call
3rd time will be the charm?
patrick
On 16 Apr 2015, at 01:02, Joe Bauman via Utah-Astronomy <utah- astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> wrote:
Why must Musk keep trying to land the stage upright without parachutes? Why not do it the good, old-fashioned ATK way and chute it down to the ocean and let it float until picked up?
From: Wiggins Patrick <paw@getbeehive.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:55 AM Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Space X music video
Goes to show that the folks at Space-X have a sense of humor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yypBjVpDJZY&feature=youtu.be
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http:
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
participants (5)
-
daniel turner -
Erik Hansen -
Jamie Bradley -
Joe Bauman -
Wiggins Patrick