RE: [Utah-astronomy] Finderscope poll
Chuck, Most of my scope time is now spent imaging, but I still like to do a little visual observing now and then. I had a Rigel Quickfinder on my Sky 90 and it worked great for getting in the ballpark. My biggest problem was remembering to turn it off when I was done using it. I went through lots of batteries. I have heard that the Telrad is even better than the Rigel, but I have never owned one. As far as finder scopes go, I have been disgusted with nearly every finder I have used until I got my first Takahashi. I currently own a 6x30mm and a 7x50mm, and they are both superb. I was really surprised to find that the 30mm Tak was way better than all the larger diameter finders I had used before.... and the 50mm is even better. The optics are clear and sharp and the view is bright. I highly recommend them. I can often see the object of interest in the finder, even when I don't expect to see it. You can pick up used versions on Astromart for a reasonable price. In my opinion, they are worth the money. I also agree that small refractors make great finders. I often mounted my Sky 90 on the CN-212 and found it very nice for locating objects. In fact, I often found the view through the small refractor to be better than the larger scope. A small refractor with a low power eyepiece can be a wonderful finder.... maybe the best alternative. That is my 2-cents worth. Cheers, Tyler _____________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces+tylerallred=earthlink.net@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces+tylerallred=earthlink.net@mailman.xmission.co m] On Behalf Of Chuck Hards Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:35 AM To: Utah-Astro Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Finderscope poll As I begin to address the details on a new scope, I find myself curious as to what the current trends are as far as finderscopes. I have my own personal favorites, but it never hurts to see what else is out there. Can list members help? A. What is the aperture of your primary finder? B. Do you use an auxilliary scope? (larger than primary finder, usually much smaller than main instrument) If so, what is it's aperture? I'm not referring to guidescopes used in imaging applications, but a visual auxilliary telescope mounted on the main instrument. C. Do you use a reflex site? (Terad, Starbeam, Quickfinder, Mars-eye, etc.) D. Is your primary finder correct imaging, inverted, or mirror-reversed? E. Finally, what kind of reticle or other cross-hairs do you favor for the finder, if you do? Illuminated? Just an informal poll. TIA. ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ The all-new Yahoo! Mail beta Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. http://new.mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
In case you aren't sick of the thread on climate change, I thought this article in today's news was highly relevant to the recent discussion: ----------------------------------------------------- State of the Arctic warming, melting WASHINGTON - Signs of warming continue in the Arctic with a decline in sea ice, an increase in shrubs growing on the tundra and rising concerns about the Greenland ice sheet. "There have been regional warming periods before. Now we're seeing Arctic-wide changes," James Overland, an oceanographer at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle, said Thursday. For the past five years, it was at least 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit above average over the Arctic over the entire year, he said. The new "State of the Arctic" analysis, released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, also reports an increase in northward movement of warmer water through the Bering Strait in 2001-2004. This may have contributed to a continuing reduction of sea ice. During that time, there were record lows in sea ice coverage in the region, Overland said. This year there was more normal coverage in the Bering area but a record low on the Atlantic side of the Arctic. In the past when such a shift occurred, there would have been no net loss of ice overall, just a change in where there was a smaller amount. Now, however, there is both the shift and an overall net loss of ice, he said. Indeed, the report said Arctic sea ice coverage this past March was the lowest in winter since measurements by satellite began in the early 1970s. Jacqueline A. Richter-Menge of the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory in Hanover, N.H., said the sea ice decline is now being observed in both winter and summer. The study was designed to assess the overall impact of climate change in the Arctic and will be updated annually. It was compiled by researchers from the United States, Canada France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden and Russia, she said. In addition, 2007 has been designated the International Year of the Arctic, with intense scientific study of the region planned. There have been many changes over the Arctic land areas, too, said Vladimir E. Romanovsky, a professor at the geophysical institute of the University of Alaska. These include changes in vegetation, river discharge into the Arctic Ocean, glaciers and permafrost. The tundra is becoming greener with the growth of more shrubs, he said. This development is causing problems in some areas as herds of reindeer migrate. At the same time, there is some decrease in the greening of the northern forest areas, probably due to drought. The glaciers are continuing to shrink and river discharge into the Arctic Ocean is rising, Romanovsky said. There has been a significant warming of the permafrost over the past 30 years, he added. Much of the damage to the permafrost soil can be blamed on human construction activities and fires, he said. In many areas, this frozen ground is close to the melting point and soon could begin to thaw. Overland said the changes are affecting wildlife in the Arctic. Those in the middle levels of the ocean, such as pollock, seem to do well; those on the surface ice or the sea floor, such as walrus or crabs, are not coping as well. "We're seeing a lot of indicators of climate change in the Arctic and that may be an indicator for change in other parts of the world," Overland said. Most of the heating from the sun comes to the equator and subequatorial regions, and a lot of heat leaves by radiation from Arctic, he said. "The temperature difference between the Arctic and equator drives all of our weather," Overland said. If the Arctic warms up and that difference is reduced, weather could change, though people remain unsure about the effect. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061116/ap_on_sc/arctic ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Compare mortgage rates for today. Get up to 5 free quotes. Www2.nextag.com
participants (2)
-
Richard Tenney -
Tyler Allred