Re: [Utah-astronomy] What to see in the spring sky, in light polluted viewing...
How about NGC 3242 (Ghost of Jupiter), NGC 1535, IC 418, NGC 2438 and NGC 2440 for Planetary Nebulae.I like M93, M46, M47, M41, M35, M44, M67, NGC 2264, and NGC 2244 for open clusters. I also like NGC 2261 (Hubble's Variable Nebula) this time of year. Debbie Sorry, this took so late to get through but my e-mails were bouncing till I fixed the problem. Our domain name got changed and it is causing me headaches. On Thu Mar 15 0:29 , cmh856@aol.com sent:
Ann, you've been given some good suggestions by other list members.
I would add that most planetary nebulae and globular clusters are good targets from a SL Valley location. From my yard in the approximate center of the valley, a favorite activity is to pick a constellation and hunt-down every single planetary nebula and/or globular within reach of my scope- and I used to do this with only a broadband LPR filter, before I got my O-III. Especially fun are the "tiny blue dot" type of planetaries, which take high magnification well (sometimes needed to be sure they are not field stars), and
the high
power darkens the background sky nicely as well. You might be surprised at the detail some of them yield under higher powers with a reasonable aperture, even in the city.
Of course the O-III won't do anything for the globulars, but you shouldn't need one for those anyway.
Double and multiple stars are often very rewarding, especially when there is a good color contrast between members. Light pollution has no effect on these objects.
Valley observing isn't a lost cause, it just lacks the "wow" factor of a star-spangled sky overhead. Many neat things to observe.
In a message dated 3/14/2007 8:07:41 PM Mountain Standard Time, MichaelCarnes@earthlink.net writes:
Hi Ann, Don't worry. We'll all be getting under dark skies soon.
************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Thanks to all of you for your great suggestions. I can't wait for the weekend to go out and try your ideas! Ann M. Blanchard Executive Assistant to the Assoc. VP Undergraduate Studies 110 Sill University of Utah (801) 581-3188 a.blanchard@ugs.utah.edu -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces+a.blanchard=ugs.utah.edu@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces+a.blanchard=ugs.utah.edu@mailman.xmission .com] On Behalf Of astrodeb@beyondbb.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10:20 AM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] What to see in the spring sky,in light polluted viewing... How about NGC 3242 (Ghost of Jupiter), NGC 1535, IC 418, NGC 2438 and NGC 2440 for Planetary Nebulae.I like M93, M46, M47, M41, M35, M44, M67, NGC 2264, and NGC 2244 for open clusters. I also like NGC 2261 (Hubble's Variable Nebula) this time of year. Debbie Sorry, this took so late to get through but my e-mails were bouncing till I fixed the problem. Our domain name got changed and it is causing me headaches. On Thu Mar 15 0:29 , cmh856@aol.com sent:
Ann, you've been given some good suggestions by other list members.
I would add that most planetary nebulae and globular clusters are good
targets from a SL Valley location. From my yard in the approximate center of the
valley, a favorite activity is to pick a constellation and hunt-down every
single planetary nebula and/or globular within reach of my scope- and I used to
do this with only a broadband LPR filter, before I got my O-III. Especially
fun are the "tiny blue dot" type of planetaries, which take high
magnification well (sometimes needed to be sure they are not field stars), and
the high
power darkens the background sky nicely as well. You might be surprised at
the detail some of them yield under higher powers with a reasonable aperture,
even in the city.
Of course the O-III won't do anything for the globulars, but you shouldn't
need one for those anyway.
Double and multiple stars are often very rewarding, especially when there is
a good color contrast between members. Light pollution has no effect on
these objects.
Valley observing isn't a lost cause, it just lacks the "wow" factor of a
star-spangled sky overhead. Many neat things to observe.
In a message dated 3/14/2007 8:07:41 PM Mountain Standard Time,
MichaelCarnes@earthlink.net writes:
Hi Ann,
Don't worry. We'll all be getting under dark skies soon.
************************************** AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
_______________________________________________
Utah-Astronomy mailing list
Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Nice report, Deb. Anybody want to comment on which galaxies might be OK from a light-polluted location, if any? Cory wants to look through our telescope but doesn't want to stand outside all night at a dark location, so I will probably set up somewhere around Red Butte Garden tonight. Could someone suggest some good targets, particularly galaxies? Thanks, Joe
participants (3)
-
Ann Blanchard -
astrodebï¼ beyondbb.com -
Joe Bauman