Re: [Utah-astronomy] Shooting Perseids
Hi Rob, I've been away from my computer for awhile so I haven't had a chance to respond to you. I was thinking of getting a wide-angle lens for milky way shots. These lenses are very forgiving as far as tracking errors go. I don't think I'll have a problem if I get my polar scope aligned right. I was reading in "Spendors of the Universe" that a wide-angle lens will be one of the most used lenses for piggy-back astrophotography. I hear I can take exposures for 15-20 minutes if there is no light pollution. I was thinking about spending the night up at Kolob Reservoir. At 8000 ft it is nice and dark and cool up there. We are into the 100s right now so I like a little altitude gain. I'm just going to try and experiment with different lenses and see what I get. Hopefully I will be more successful than the last time I attempted to do piggy-back astrophotography. I'll try looking for the Fuji Provia 400 slide film at a couple of camera stores in town. I'm looking on Ebay for a 28mm f2.8 lens. I want the faster f2.8 rather than the f.3.5, right? Good luck with your trip to the southern skies. Debbie
Debbie, please put a wide-angle shot on your Gallery page if you get good results. I bought a WA lens for my trusty old Pentax K a couple of years ago and haven't had a chance to try it out on a dark sky yet. Good luck! C. --- UTAHDEB@aol.com wrote:
I was thinking of getting a wide-angle lens for milky way shots.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
And yes 2.8 is faster than 3.5. and F2 is even faster and F1.4 is really FAST!! and there was even a Canon model out in the mid 60's w/ a F .95 lens. Aloha Rob
participants (3)
-
Chuck Hards -
Rob Ratkowski -
UTAHDEB@aol.com