Re: Comet Pojmanski
Joe, you have misunderstood the GoTo discussion. The criticism was never leveled at anyone personally and I really am sorry that you took it personally. I have never, NEVER condemned GoTo as intrinsically bad, nor thought less of a person who uses it. What I have a hard time accepting is it's use as an excuse to purposely not gain a better understanding of the sky, celestial mechanics, mount/imaging kinematics, etc. Learning should not stop because of helpful technology. Use the GoTo to expand and augment your skills and knowledge, not substitute for them outright. Don't sell yourself short.
From: Joe Bauman <bau@desnews.com>
I know there's been a lot of criticism about people like me with go-to 'scopes. But as a guy who has far less time for astronomy than he'd like, and who is somewhat dyslexic anyway (so I have a lot of trouble fining my way around the heavens or even around cities, sometimes), a go-to allows me to enjoy a hobby I otherwise could not have. Best wishes, Joe
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi, Chuck, I took no offense. I enjoy the rough and tumble of discussion. And it's a debate that people have a right to think about, the value of learning the night sky versus the convenience of go-tos. Thanks, Joe
participants (2)
-
Chuck Hards -
Joe Bauman