Comparison of green laser pointer and car headlight
Back in January 2005 when this was a hot topic, I took some photos comparing the brightness of a green laser pointer and a car headlight at 500ft (152 meters) and 1000ft (304 meters) and observed the brightness of the beam out to approximately 1300ft (396 meters). Just got around to typing up my notes and posting the pictures. http://members.csolutions.net/fisherka/astronote/observed/Glptst/index.html Hope this provides a useful collection of references. Regards - Canopus56 __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
That's a lot of words Kurt. I fell asleep midway through the first paragraph and hit my head on the keyboard. Too much to digest this late at night I suppose. I'll have to take another stab at it when I'm more rested. ;) In the meantime, what does it mean? Are you trying to show a need for some type of regulation governing the use of these 5mw devices? Personally I don't think consumer grade green lasers need to be regulated. I think a warning on the package stating that shining these into someones eyes on purpose may be hazardous to their health, might be enough. It works for cigarettes and alcohol. I quit smoking and I... well, it worked for cigarettes anyway. ;) You can tell someone not to look at the sun, and yet more times than not, they will turn their head and look right at it. You can't regulate stupidity. I think those who get hit in the eye by these green lasers can make their view known to the perpetrator more effectively than a stupid regulation. We're over regulated as it is... As far as Commercial Pilots go, I'm in favor of arming them with green lasers so they can defend themselves. In fact, I will go one better. I will mount their green lasers on top of their pistols so they have a choice of which one to use... JMHO. ;) Quoting Canopus56 <canopus56@yahoo.com>:
Back in January 2005 when this was a hot topic, I took some photos comparing the brightness of a green laser pointer and a car headlight at 500ft (152 meters) and 1000ft (304 meters) and observed the brightness of the beam out to approximately 1300ft (396 meters). Just got around to typing up my notes and posting the pictures.
http://members.csolutions.net/fisherka/astronote/observed/Glptst/index.html
Hope this provides a useful collection of references.
Very concise paper, Kurt, thank you for posting the link. Ann House and I are still planning to illuminate each other from across the valley with our green, and red, lasers, (a distance of around 9 or 10 miles) just to see what the effect looks like- well beyond any hazard range, and well under and away from any aircraft. We may inadvertantly illuminate a bat, pigeon, or seagull. I'm thinking of some imaging options as well, to create a more durable and lasting record, but this is still speculative. More a curiosity exercise than having any claim to science. (Poke it with a stick!) We already know what headlights look like from far away. The bottom line is, keep the beam out of the eyes, and if they offend the astro-imager, either establish some enforceable yet fair rules, or image from private property. It's been said before, when lasers are outlawed, only outlaws will have lasers. Narrowband laser safety glasses have existed for decades. The well-equipped pilot could keep a pair handy for added peace-of-mind, in the event they are subjected to abuse by an irresponsible user. Can 'laser registration' be far in the future? __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com> wrote:
Very concise paper, Kurt, thank you for posting the link. . . . Can 'laser registration' be far in the future?
To Chuck and Guy. Thanks. I posted a revision that cleaned out spelling mistakes and expanded a discussion on instrusion into FAA regulated "critical flight zones." I don't think further regulation is going anywhere, since the Airline Pilot's Assoc. plan to get a new law passed floundered in front of Congress in March 2005. Nonetheless, I felt that getting more info out there in one place on the distance effects was warranted and maybe the FDA should require manufacturers to include some information on those distance effects in their product inserts. Personally, until you've walked out 1000-1500ft and looked down the beam, I don't feel the average consumer (which includes myself) really appreciates their potential to create a light nuisance. - Canopus56(Kurt) __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com
participants (3)
-
Canopus56 -
Chuck Hards -
diveboss@xmission.com