Did anybody else read this? http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/223291961.html It now appears that our model of solar magnetic-related activity may be in need of serious modification. Interesting!
Or perhaps not, a lot of assumptions on what is going on internally.
Did anybody else read this?
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/223291961.html
It now appears that our model of solar magnetic-related activity may be in need of serious modification. Interesting! _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
That was the gist of the article, Erik. Observation didn't fit the model. On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Erik Hansen <erikhansen@thebluezone.net>wrote:
Or perhaps not, a lot of assumptions on what is going on internally.
Did anybody else read this?
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/223291961.html
It now appears that our model of solar magnetic-related activity may be
in
need of serious modification. Interesting!
participants (2)
-
Chuck Hards -
Erik Hansen