I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago. Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together. The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures. As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image. http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 Clear skies (please), patrick
Way to go, Patrick. -- Joe --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "utah astronomy listserve utah astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:22 AM I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago. Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together. The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures. As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image. http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 Clear skies (please), patrick _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Dear fellow science folks, If you feel as strongly about space exploration as I do, perhaps you'd like to read my blog today. I am not trying to toot my own horn, though I'm really good at it, but this time I think we need to push for a strong commitment to space. You might want to pass this one along to someone. http://deseretnews.com/blogs/1,5322,10000034,00.html?bD=20090123 Thanks, Joe
Thanks. But wait until you see what Tyler did using the RGBL images I posted. See it at: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 I think in future let's all just shoot the pictures and let Tyler do the processing... :) patrick On 23 Jan 2009, at 10:57, Joe Bauman wrote:
Way to go, Patrick. -- Joe
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "utah astronomy listserve utah astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:22 AM
I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago.
Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together.
The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures.
As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2
Clear skies (please),
patrick
OK Tyler, what's the secret? If you don't spill the beans now we'll just have to nag you at the Feb. SLAS meeting.... -- Joe --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 8:55 PM Thanks. But wait until you see what Tyler did using the RGBL images I posted. See it at: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 I think in future let's all just shoot the pictures and let Tyler do the processing... :) patrick On 23 Jan 2009, at 10:57, Joe Bauman wrote:
Way to go, Patrick. -- Joe
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "utah astronomy listserve utah astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:22 AM
I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago.
Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together.
The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures.
As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2
Clear skies (please),
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Well, Tyler’s processing is indeed very impressive. I have been reading books and online articles trying to process Patrick’s kit and have not even come close to what Tyler has produced. The idea occurred to me to download Tyler’s B&W, Red, Green, and Blue images and stack them by hand; witch I did. My expectation was that I should come up with Tyler’s final product; but I guessed wrong. I was hoping that if they did come out the same, then I would at least know what intermediate steps to shoot for. It didn’t happen like I hoped. Then I started monkeying around with the color to see if I could figure out his secrets. But no. I am temporarily posting on the Gallery two photos of trying to reverse engineer Tyler’s photo. The first one is simply hand stacking the four images in PhotoShop 7 with the B&W as background and the Red, Green, and Blue set to 50% opacity – no dice. I can’t even tell you how I got to the last image other than I started from the first composite image. I tried like the dickens to get the purple to be redder. I just couldn’t seem to get the blue out. I have a lot to learn about color blending and about PhotoShop. This whole thing has been fun for me though. I would agree with Patrick’s assessment to send all my images to Tyler except that if Tyler can do it, I can do it….I hope. It might take some time though. I hope I have enough time left. http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=253
Jim, don't be discouraged. Your "first try" image actually has more information in the center of the nebula, where Tyler's is much too bright and "over-exposed". Further processing could almost certainly fix that, however. On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Jim Gibson <jimgibson00@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well, Tyler's processing is indeed very impressive. I have been reading books and online articles trying to process Patrick's kit and have not even come close to what Tyler has produced.
The idea occurred to me to download Tyler's B&W, Red, Green, and Blue images and stack them by hand; witch I did. My expectation was that I should come up with Tyler's final product; but I guessed wrong. I was hoping that if they did come out the same, then I would at least know what intermediate steps to shoot for. It didn't happen like I hoped.
Then I started monkeying around with the color to see if I could figure out his secrets. But no.
I am temporarily posting on the Gallery two photos of trying to reverse engineer Tyler's photo. The first one is simply hand stacking the four images in PhotoShop 7 with the B&W as background and the Red, Green, and Blue set to 50% opacity – no dice. I can't even tell you how I got to the last image other than I started from the first composite image. I tried like the dickens to get the purple to be redder. I just couldn't seem to get the blue out. I have a lot to learn about color blending and about PhotoShop. This whole thing has been fun for me though.
I would agree with Patrick's assessment to send all my images to Tyler except that if Tyler can do it, I can do it….I hope. It might take some time though. I hope I have enough time left.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=253
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Hi Jim, I agree with Chuck. When I first read your post I went to the gallery expecting to find something awful. Instead, what I found was an image that looks better than my original. Mine looks like it's being viewed through fog. Yours is much crisper and shows much more detail. I am really looking forward to Tyler's talk next month. While I don't have the patience to duplicate his level of work I am interested in seeing how he does it. patrick On 24 Jan 2009, at 13:22, Chuck Hards wrote:
Jim, don't be discouraged. Your "first try" image actually has more information in the center of the nebula, where Tyler's is much too bright and "over-exposed". Further processing could almost certainly fix that, however.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Jim Gibson <jimgibson00@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well, Tyler's processing is indeed very impressive. I have been reading books and online articles trying to process Patrick's kit and have not even come close to what Tyler has produced.
The idea occurred to me to download Tyler's B&W, Red, Green, and Blue images and stack them by hand; witch I did. My expectation was that I should come up with Tyler's final product; but I guessed wrong. I was hoping that if they did come out the same, then I would at least know what intermediate steps to shoot for. It didn't happen like I hoped.
Then I started monkeying around with the color to see if I could figure out his secrets. But no.
I am temporarily posting on the Gallery two photos of trying to reverse engineer Tyler's photo. The first one is simply hand stacking the four images in PhotoShop 7 with the B&W as background and the Red, Green, and Blue set to 50% opacity – no dice. I can't even tell you how I got to the last image other than I started from the first composite image. I tried like the dickens to get the purple to be redder. I just couldn't seem to get the blue out. I have a lot to learn about color blending and about PhotoShop. This whole thing has been fun for me though.
I would agree with Patrick's assessment to send all my images to Tyler except that if Tyler can do it, I can do it….I hope. It might take some time though. I hope I have enough time left.
Thanks Patrick Keep in mind though, I just copied Tylers 4 images and tried to see if I could get to the last same final product. My next big challenge will be to see if I can come up with those 4 nice images (B&W + red + green + blue). This is all fun though. I do appreciate your help. Thanks Jim Gibson --- On Sat, 1/24/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Saturday, January 24, 2009, 4:37 PM Hi Jim, I agree with Chuck. When I first read your post I went to the gallery expecting to find something awful. Instead, what I found was an image that looks better than my original. Mine looks like it's being viewed through fog. Yours is much crisper and shows much more detail. I am really looking forward to Tyler's talk next month. While I don't have the patience to duplicate his level of work I am interested in seeing how he does it. patrick On 24 Jan 2009, at 13:22, Chuck Hards wrote:
Jim, don't be discouraged. Your "first try" image actually has more information in the center of the nebula, where Tyler's is much too bright and "over-exposed". Further processing could almost certainly fix that, however.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Jim Gibson <jimgibson00@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Well, Tyler's processing is indeed very impressive. I have been reading
books and online articles trying to process Patrick's kit and have not even
come close to what Tyler has produced.
The idea occurred to me to download Tyler's B&W, Red, Green, and Blue images and stack them by hand; witch I did. My expectation was that I should come up with Tyler's final product; but I guessed wrong. I
was hoping that if they did come out the same, then I would at least know what intermediate steps to shoot for. It didn't happen like I hoped.
Then I started monkeying around with the color to see if I could figure out his secrets. But no.
I am temporarily posting on the Gallery two photos of trying to reverse engineer Tyler's photo. The first one is simply hand stacking the
four images in PhotoShop 7 with the B&W as background and the Red, Green, and Blue set to 50% opacity – no dice. I can't even tell you how I got to the last image other than I started from the first composite image. I tried like the dickens to get the purple to be redder. I just couldn't seem to get the blue out. I have a lot to learn about color blending and about PhotoShop. This whole thing has been fun for me though.
I would agree with Patrick's assessment to send all my images to Tyler except that if Tyler can do it, I can do it….I hope. It might take some time though. I hope I have enough time left.
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Hello All, If anyone is interested, I could use some of my time at the February meeting to demonstrate a few simple processing techniques, using Patrick's original data for M1. I think that 10-15 minutes with that data might be useful for many folks who are learning to process astronomic images. After the meeting, people could experiment with the techniques at home, using the same data. That might be a fun learning experience. When viewing Patrick's data, I could tell that it was of excellent quality. I just used the LRGB jpegs that were posted in his gallery, but I'm sure that the original fits files would provide an even better version, especially in the bright central region. To be frank, I really didn't do all that much to the original data. It was good to begin with. Anyone with Photoshop could get results equal to mine, using some simple and easy to learn techniques. A little feedback would be good because I'm not really sure what people would like to hear and see in my presentation. I would like to tailor my comments to provide something that the group would perhaps benefit from and enjoy. Let me know if the processing exercise sounds interesting. Thanks, Tyler _____________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Wiggins Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:56 PM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot Thanks. But wait until you see what Tyler did using the RGBL images I posted. See it at: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 I think in future let's all just shoot the pictures and let Tyler do the processing... :) patrick On 23 Jan 2009, at 10:57, Joe Bauman wrote:
Way to go, Patrick. -- Joe
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "utah astronomy listserve utah astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:22 AM
I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago.
Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together.
The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures.
As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2
Clear skies (please),
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
I vote for looking at the wonderful views, then hearing how they were made -- that's how greedy I am! Thanks, Joe --- On Sun, 1/25/09, Tyler Allred <tylerallred@earthlink.net> wrote: From: Tyler Allred <tylerallred@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "'Utah Astronomy'" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Sunday, January 25, 2009, 7:35 PM Hello All, If anyone is interested, I could use some of my time at the February meeting to demonstrate a few simple processing techniques, using Patrick's original data for M1. I think that 10-15 minutes with that data might be useful for many folks who are learning to process astronomic images. After the meeting, people could experiment with the techniques at home, using the same data. That might be a fun learning experience. When viewing Patrick's data, I could tell that it was of excellent quality. I just used the LRGB jpegs that were posted in his gallery, but I'm sure that the original fits files would provide an even better version, especially in the bright central region. To be frank, I really didn't do all that much to the original data. It was good to begin with. Anyone with Photoshop could get results equal to mine, using some simple and easy to learn techniques. A little feedback would be good because I'm not really sure what people would like to hear and see in my presentation. I would like to tailor my comments to provide something that the group would perhaps benefit from and enjoy. Let me know if the processing exercise sounds interesting. Thanks, Tyler _____________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Wiggins Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:56 PM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot Thanks. But wait until you see what Tyler did using the RGBL images I posted. See it at: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 I think in future let's all just shoot the pictures and let Tyler do the processing... :) patrick On 23 Jan 2009, at 10:57, Joe Bauman wrote:
Way to go, Patrick. -- Joe
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "utah astronomy listserve utah astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:22 AM
I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago.
Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together.
The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures.
As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2
Clear skies (please),
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Tyler I for one would be intensely interested in learning how you processed Patrick’s data. My initial problem with trying to use Patrick’s images was that I discovered I had no software to open a FITS file. I eventually I got a plug-in for PhotoShop to open them. Then I tried Registax and DeepSkyStacker to combine the images. For a novice, I would have been better off doing it simple like what you did; start with jgp files. Once I had a success with jpg files I could build my confidence and I could have moved to the more complex stuff. I am still going to process Patrick’s data from FITS but I have a ton of stuff to learn first. Jim Gibson --- On Sun, 1/25/09, Tyler Allred <tylerallred@earthlink.net> wrote: From: Tyler Allred <tylerallred@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "'Utah Astronomy'" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Sunday, January 25, 2009, 7:35 PM Hello All, If anyone is interested, I could use some of my time at the February meeting to demonstrate a few simple processing techniques, using Patrick's original data for M1. I think that 10-15 minutes with that data might be useful for many folks who are learning to process astronomic images. After the meeting, people could experiment with the techniques at home, using the same data. That might be a fun learning experience. When viewing Patrick's data, I could tell that it was of excellent quality. I just used the LRGB jpegs that were posted in his gallery, but I'm sure that the original fits files would provide an even better version, especially in the bright central region. To be frank, I really didn't do all that much to the original data. It was good to begin with. Anyone with Photoshop could get results equal to mine, using some simple and easy to learn techniques. A little feedback would be good because I'm not really sure what people would like to hear and see in my presentation. I would like to tailor my comments to provide something that the group would perhaps benefit from and enjoy. Let me know if the processing exercise sounds interesting. Thanks, Tyler _____________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Wiggins Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:56 PM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot Thanks. But wait until you see what Tyler did using the RGBL images I posted. See it at: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 I think in future let's all just shoot the pictures and let Tyler do the processing... :) patrick On 23 Jan 2009, at 10:57, Joe Bauman wrote:
Way to go, Patrick. -- Joe
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "utah astronomy listserve utah astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:22 AM
I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago.
Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together.
The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures.
As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2
Clear skies (please),
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
The two things I'd be most interested in seeing would be a display of some of your images and a demonstration of your technique. It would also be nice to see some of the equipment you use but it's a long walk from the parking lot to the lecture hall so equipment displays may not be practical (although you could show the equipment at ATS at Village Inn afterwards). Also Tyler, if you think it a good idea, I could make CDs available containing all of the raw images I used to make the M-1 shot which folks could take home and try their hand at image processing. Note that I had initially thought about posting the images to the web so folks could download them but they total about 60 MB and there's not enough room on my server to do that. patrick On 25 Jan 2009, at 19:35, Tyler Allred wrote:
If anyone is interested, I could use some of my time at the February meeting to demonstrate a few simple processing techniques, using Patrick's original data for M1. I think that 10-15 minutes with that data might be useful for many folks who are learning to process astronomic images. After the meeting, people could experiment with the techniques at home, using the same data. That might be a fun learning experience.
When viewing Patrick's data, I could tell that it was of excellent quality. I just used the LRGB jpegs that were posted in his gallery, but I'm sure that the original fits files would provide an even better version, especially in the bright central region. To be frank, I really didn't do all that much to the original data. It was good to begin with. Anyone with Photoshop could get results equal to mine, using some simple and easy to learn techniques. A little feedback would be good because I'm not really sure what people would like to hear and see in my presentation. I would like to tailor my comments to provide something that the group would perhaps benefit from and enjoy. Let me know if the processing exercise sounds interesting.
Thanks, Tyler
A little more Photoshop processing on Tyler's version brings out detail in the center. http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=899 -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tyler Allred Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 7:36 PM To: 'Utah Astronomy' Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot Hello All, If anyone is interested, I could use some of my time at the February meeting to demonstrate a few simple processing techniques, using Patrick's original data for M1. I think that 10-15 minutes with that data might be useful for many folks who are learning to process astronomic images. After the meeting, people could experiment with the techniques at home, using the same data. That might be a fun learning experience. When viewing Patrick's data, I could tell that it was of excellent quality. I just used the LRGB jpegs that were posted in his gallery, but I'm sure that the original fits files would provide an even better version, especially in the bright central region. To be frank, I really didn't do all that much to the original data. It was good to begin with. Anyone with Photoshop could get results equal to mine, using some simple and easy to learn techniques. A little feedback would be good because I'm not really sure what people would like to hear and see in my presentation. I would like to tailor my comments to provide something that the group would perhaps benefit from and enjoy. Let me know if the processing exercise sounds interesting. Thanks, Tyler _____________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Wiggins Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:56 PM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot Thanks. But wait until you see what Tyler did using the RGBL images I posted. See it at: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2 I think in future let's all just shoot the pictures and let Tyler do the processing... :) patrick On 23 Jan 2009, at 10:57, Joe Bauman wrote:
Way to go, Patrick. -- Joe
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote: From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New M-1 shot To: "utah astronomy listserve utah astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:22 AM
I finally got around to processing, assembling and posting images of M-1 I took a few nights ago.
Posted is the clear, red, green and blue images and the color which I made by adding the others together.
The clear is a compilation of 30 one minute exposures. Each of the color files are compilations of 15 one minute exposures.
As before I'm happy to email anyone who asks for the FIT versions (the ones online are JPG) so they can try their hand at making their own color image.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=2
Clear skies (please),
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
participants (6)
-
Chuck Hards -
Don J. Colton -
Jim Gibson -
Joe Bauman -
Patrick Wiggins -
Tyler Allred