Re: [Utah-astronomy] How dim of objects can I see?
Some more questions from a novice... As I have begun looking at the sky from South Jordan, with no moon, in the light polluted Salt Lake Valley, I seem to be able to see: - Mag. 4.15 - with the unaided eye, I can see the dim star of Cassiopeia - N2599. (I haven't been able to see the dim star of the little dipper HP79822 Mag. 4.95) - Mag. 9.5 - with my 300mm Nikon telephoto (cheap optics version with noticeable chromatic aberration) - via an up to 20 sec. exposure on my digital camera and a barn door tracker. So a few questions: - Do the above 4.15 & 9.5 Magnitudes sound in the ballpark? - What would be an expected 'seeable' Magnitude? for dark sky unaided eye ... If I went to some good Southern Utah spot. - What Magnitude should expect I be able to see with a 8" Schmidt-Cass. in town? All the planets? (Pluto is 14.9). I just borrowed a Celestron C8 from a friend who was letting his collect dust. I'm dusting it for him for the next couple months. - And, what kind of difference will I get with the C8 if I go to a dark sky site? On my first night out with the scope last weekend (in the moonlight), I had a difficult time finding things. I could find the Orion Nebula. I couldn't find the Andromeda Galaxy, there were no eyeball visible stars close enough for me to successfully to hop from. Also the upside-down & left-to-right reversed guide scope was different than the upside-right but left-to-right reversed main scope, which continually confused me about which direction I was moving as I switched between them. I am wondering if getting a guide scope that reverses things (or not) in the same way as your main scope would help. And/or perhaps a lower power main eyepiece for finding things, then switching to a higher power eyepiece. - Anyone have preferred methods/techniques they would pass along? I figure I will continue in my backyard until I can find more objects. Then maybe go to the (5 Mile Canyon) close-by area mentioned in another thread for an evening with a little more darkness after I believe I can better find my way in the dark. It looks like a should have a list before I go out away from home in the dark, so I'm not fumbling for "what do I look at now, and where is it?" This is great fun. Gary Logan - Gary@The-Logans.net <mailto:Gary@The-Logans.net> _____
My antique eyes struggle to see much below mag 5 at SPOC while some SLASers I've spoken with (with much better eyes than I) can routinely see down to mag 7 when the seeing is good. So while sky conditions and optical aid will effect seeing a great deal, your eyes also play a big part. As does your experience level. It's not all that uncommon for an experience observer to see things plainly that a novice can not see at all. On 08 Dec 2008, at 20:08, Gary Bulk wrote:
So a few questions: - Do the above 4.15 & 9.5 Magnitudes sound in the ballpark?
Sounds pretty good. The naked eye number being a bit better than I would have expected for the south end of the valley looking north.
- What would be an expected 'seeable' Magnitude? for dark sky unaided eye ... If I went to some good Southern Utah spot.
Each year SLAS does a big star party at Bryce Canyon and I do 6 much smaller ones so I'm pretty familiar with Bryce's skies. As I mentioned above, your eyes will be the real test. But certainly good, dark adapted (and usually young) eyes can get down to 6ish there. Many go deeper.
- What Magnitude should expect I be able to see with a 8" Schmidt- Cass. in town? All the planets? (Pluto is 14.9).
14-15 can be doable so, yes, all eight planets and Pluto can be seen with a C-8 although Pluto can be tough. I saw Pluto once through a C-8 but only after first finding it in a much larger scope first so I knew exactly where to look.
- And, what kind of difference will I get with the C8 if I go to a dark sky site?
For solar, lunar and most planetary views there wont be a great difference. But when you start hunting for DSOs (Deep Sky Objects) you'll find it much easier to see "faint fuzzies" from under a dark sky.
On my first night out with the scope last weekend (in the moonlight), I had a difficult time finding things. I could find the Orion Nebula. I couldn't find the Andromeda Galaxy, there were no eyeball visible stars close enough for me to successfully to hop from.
Part of that was probably experience level the other sky brightness. If the C-8 you are using has setting circles (large numbered circles, one on each axis) you can learn to use those to help find things.
Also the upside-down & left-to-right reversed guide scope was different than the upside-right but left-to-right reversed main scope, which continually confused me about which direction I was moving as I switched between them.
Again, you'll learn with experience. Note that up-down-left-right will change with the C-8 too depending on how you position the eyepiece and what accessories you use.
I am wondering if getting a guide scope that reverses things (or not) in the same way as your main scope would help.
You might try a Telrad ( http://www.backyard-astro.com/equipment/accessories/telrad/telrad.html ). They are zero power and have no light gathering ability but the "heads up display" that the Telrad affords is a plus for many. Or maybe just learn to use what you have. Since I see you just joined SLAS I'll add that all of the SLAS loaner scopes have Telrads installed. The one thing I'd stay away from are right angle finders. Much easier (for me, at least) to look straight through.
And/or perhaps a lower power main eyepiece for finding things, then switching to a higher power eyepiece.
Always start with lowest power and then work your way up if you need higher power.
- Anyone have preferred methods/techniques they would pass along?
It would be difficult to go into techniques here. Best to bring the scope to a star party and have folks show you. SLAS's public star parties will not resume until spring but sometime folks will post here about private star parties.
It looks like a should have a list before I go out away from home in the dark, so I'm not fumbling for "what do I look at now, and where is it?"
That's another personal choice item. Some get out in the field and just improvise while others are very organized (there are computer programs to help organize observing sessions though I've never used them). patrick
Hi Gary: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Gary Bulk <garybulk@the-logans.net> wrote:
*Some more questions from a novice... - Do the above 4.15 & 9.5 Magnitudes sound in the ballpark?*
Limiting magnitude varies greatly in the valley, dependant on local light pollution quite a bit. I live in Granger and its a rare night that I can see dimmer than 4.5, however, it does get much better after midnight, and even better during the wee hours of the morning. Once all the cars are off the road, and most business lights get turned-off, the sky darkens noticeably. *- What would be an expected 'seeable' Magnitude? for dark sky unaided eye ... If I went to some good Southern Utah spot.* Again it varies, and your own eyesight is a big part of it, but magnitude 6.5 at a dark site is not unreasonable to expect. Some sharp-eyed observers can see appreciably dimmer stars. *- What Magnitude should expect I be able to see with a 8" Schmidt-Cass. in town? All the planets? (Pluto is 14.9). I just borrowed a Celestron C8 from a friend who was letting his collect dust. I'm dusting it for him for the next couple months.* None of the planets require a dark sky to see well. A steady atmosphere, and having the object above 45-degrees altitude is more important than a dark sky for solar system objects. Pluto will appear as a tiny star, amid a field of stars. Having a good locator chart is essential, and you may need to compare the view from one night to the next, checking for Pluto's movement. *- And, what kind of difference will I get with the C8 if I go to a dark sky site?* ** On the planets, little or no difference. A dark sky is prerequisite for extended, nebulous objects and galaxies. Objects with low surface brightness. *On my first night out with the scope last weekend (in the moonlight), I had a difficult time finding things. I could find the Orion Nebula. I couldn't find the Andromeda Galaxy, there were no eyeball visible stars close enough for me to successfully to hop from.* ** Just about any light-pollution will extinguish all but the central core of the Andromeda galaxy. It's not surprising that you didn't see it in moonlight. *Also the upside-down & left-to-right reversed guide scope was different than the upside-right but left-to-right reversed main scope, which continually confused me about which direction I was moving as I switched between them. I am wondering if getting a guide scope that reverses things (or not) in the same way as your main scope would help. And/or perhaps a lower power main eyepiece for finding things, then switching to a higher power eyepiece. - Anyone have preferred methods/techniques they would pass along?* ** I prefer a reflex sight for rough-aiming purposes; a bb-gun, "red-dot" type finder. Ive been doing this for so long and accumulated so many different types of finders that I use them all. Correct left-to-right, inverted, inverted and mirror-reversed. Generally matching the finder to the main scope view is a good first step. *I figure I will continue in my backyard until I can find more objects. Then maybe go to the (5 Mile Canyon) close-by area mentioned in another thread for an evening with a little more darkness after I believe I can better find my way in the dark. It looks like a should have a list before I go out away from home in the dark, so I'm not fumbling for "what do I look at now, and where is it?" * You can spot all of the Messier Objects from the valley, if you are judicious about the time and atmospheric conditions for some of them. Also, hundreds of NGC objects are visible from light-polluted locations. The view of all deep-sky objects is always better from a dark sky, but I'll take a mag. 4 sky to no sky any time. Have fun! -Chuck
I meant to add that I had found a lot of objects from the city before I found them from a dark sky. Sometimes too many stars actually makes locating the objects more difficult for beginners. Knowing your constellations is a big help.
Even constellations I know can be hard to make outĀ from a dark site, with many more bright stars clamoring for attention. -- Joe --- On Mon, 12/8/08, Chuck Hards <chuck.hards@gmail.com> wrote: From: Chuck Hards <chuck.hards@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] How dim of objects can I see? To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 10:07 PM I meant to add that I had found a lot of objects from the city before I found them from a dark sky. Sometimes too many stars actually makes locating the objects more difficult for beginners. Knowing your constellations is a big help. _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
My mistake. When I say "constellation", I don't mean just the traditional stick-figures we learned as kids. I refer to the constellation as a bounded area of sky. Now, that said, knowing the "sticks" is a step in the right direction. But learning the dimmer real estate in-between is ultimately what will make sky navigation easier. Don't worry if you can't absorb it all at once, it may take ten years or more to become that proficient. Think of the sky as a map. Most people have no trouble locating positions on a terrestrial map, even without labels or grid lines of longitude and lattitude, simply because they know the geography. Learning the sky is an identical process as far as your brain is concerned, and breaking it down into smaller sections, the consellations, is the equivalent of "one bite at a time". To me, it's easier because the sky is, basically, digital points rather than the infinitely gradated texture of geography. But Joe makes a valid point when under a dark sky. Find a region you are sure of, such as the north celestial pole area, then move out from there. There are few other bright stars competing with the "stick figures" in the circumpolar region. On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Joe Bauman <josephmbauman@yahoo.com> wrote:
Even constellations I know can be hard to make out from a dark site, with many more bright stars clamoring for attention. -- Joe --- On Mon, 12/8/08, Chuck Hards <chuck.hards@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Chuck Hards <chuck.hards@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] How dim of objects can I see? To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 10:07 PM
I meant to add that I had found a lot of objects from the city before I found them from a dark sky. Sometimes too many stars actually makes locating the objects more difficult for beginners. Knowing your constellations is a big help. _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Gary Bulk <garybulk@the-logans.net> wrote:
I just borrowed a Celestron C8 from a friend who was letting his collect dust. I'm dusting it for him for the next couple months.
LOL :-D That's my kind of housework! Thanks for the chuckle. -- Kiva.org - Loans That Change Lives
Gary: It sounds like you have a good start in this hobby. The practice at home will make things much easier when you finally go to dark site. This time of year though we are subject to heavy dew or even frost and that can require some extra gear like a 110volt hair drier to clear up the frosted corrector plate of a Schmidt-Cass. Good dark sites seldome have 110 volt outlets. This time of year I like to use just 10x50 binoculars. I wear them on a strap around my neck and when they become frosted, I just stick them inside my coat for 5 minutes until they are clear. There are club members who have seen all of the Messier objects with 10x50s. Plus there is very little set up and take down in the cold and dark. DT --- On Mon, 12/8/08, Gary Bulk <garybulk@the-logans.net> wrote:
From: Gary Bulk <garybulk@the-logans.net> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] How dim of objects can I see? To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 7:08 PM Some more questions from a novice... As I have begun looking at the sky from South Jordan, with no moon, in the light polluted Salt Lake Valley, I seem to be able to see:
- Mag. 4.15 - with the unaided eye, I can see the dim star of Cassiopeia - N2599. (I haven't been able to see the dim star of the little dipper HP79822 Mag. 4.95) - Mag. 9.5 - with my 300mm Nikon telephoto (cheap optics version with noticeable chromatic aberration) - via an up to 20 sec. exposure on my digital camera and a barn door tracker.
So a few questions: - Do the above 4.15 & 9.5 Magnitudes sound in the ballpark? - What would be an expected 'seeable' Magnitude? for dark sky unaided eye ... If I went to some good Southern Utah spot. - What Magnitude should expect I be able to see with a 8" Schmidt-Cass. in town? All the planets? (Pluto is 14.9). I just borrowed a Celestron C8 from a friend who was letting his collect dust. I'm dusting it for him for the next couple months. - And, what kind of difference will I get with the C8 if I go to a dark sky site?
On my first night out with the scope last weekend (in the moonlight), I had a difficult time finding things. I could find the Orion Nebula. I couldn't find the Andromeda Galaxy, there were no eyeball visible stars close enough for me to successfully to hop from.
Also the upside-down & left-to-right reversed guide scope was different than the upside-right but left-to-right reversed main scope, which continually confused me about which direction I was moving as I switched between them. I am wondering if getting a guide scope that reverses things (or not) in the same way as your main scope would help. And/or perhaps a lower power main eyepiece for finding things, then switching to a higher power eyepiece. - Anyone have preferred methods/techniques they would pass along?
I figure I will continue in my backyard until I can find more objects. Then maybe go to the (5 Mile Canyon) close-by area mentioned in another thread for an evening with a little more darkness after I believe I can better find my way in the dark. It looks like a should have a list before I go out away from home in the dark, so I'm not fumbling for "what do I look at now, and where is it?"
This is great fun. Gary Logan - Gary@The-Logans.net <mailto:Gary@The-Logans.net> _____
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
participants (6)
-
Chuck Hards -
Dan Hanks -
daniel turner -
Gary Bulk -
Joe Bauman -
Patrick Wiggins