Re: [Utah-astronomy] ISON & Pan-STARRS tonight
Still a neat comet picture, Patrick. Pan-STARRS looks better than it was when I glimpsed it. -- Joe ------------------------------ On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 10:42 PM MDT Patrick Wiggins wrote:
ISON's mini tail was fairly visible tonight: http://users.wirelessbeehive.com/~paw/temp/C_2012_S1.2013APR10.JPG
Pan-STARRS' is just too low for my set up. Too fuzzy when so low in the sky with the fuzziness only made worse by the long (1,955mm) focal length I shoot at. Best to leave this one to those with short focal lengths and wide fields: http://users.wirelessbeehive.com/~paw/temp/C_2011_L4.2013APR10.JPG
patrick _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
Thanks Joe, but I'm going to leave it to the wide field guys until it gets far enough away that it fits in my FOV and doesn't overexpose. patrick On 09 Apr 2013, at 22:51, Joe Bauman wrote:
Still a neat comet picture, Patrick. Pan-STARRS looks better than it was when I glimpsed it. -- Joe
------------------------------ On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 10:42 PM MDT Patrick Wiggins wrote:
ISON's mini tail was fairly visible tonight: http://users.wirelessbeehive.com/~paw/temp/C_2012_S1.2013APR10.JPG
Pan-STARRS' is just too low for my set up. Too fuzzy when so low in the sky with the fuzziness only made worse by the long (1,955mm) focal length I shoot at. Best to leave this one to those with short focal lengths and wide fields: http://users.wirelessbeehive.com/~paw/temp/C_2011_L4.2013APR10.JPG
patrick
participants (2)
-
Joe Bauman -
Patrick Wiggins