RE: [Utah-astronomy] Wolf Creek and Meeting last night
Ah blast! I've got an obligation that's going to keep me in town. Have fun.
Several of us are going to Wolf Creek over Labor Day weekend. Any interest from members of this group?
Dark matter is 25% and dark energy 70%. Dark matter can be explained by the concept of minimal acceleration, which may have been confirmed by the Pioneer spacecraft, now at the outskirts of the solar system
We're at an interesting point in physics, just like we were before Einstein's paper on special relativity. At that time, Newtonian physics were at an increasing loss to explain observed phenomina. Relativity extended our understanding while at the same time enclosing Newton's work as something of a subset. This is the mark of two truly successful theories. Newton still works and is encapsulated in Einstein. Now we're at that place once again where observation and theory have reached a point of stress. Very few scientists seem to doubt the expansion of the universe, but theories to explain it (string theory, dark energy, branes, etc) are themselves barely supported by experiment--if at all. Some of these may turn out to be true, but they all smell of conjecture without experimental validation. So it's time for another Einstein (that won't be me). Wonder when we'll get one.
I enjoyed the topic and discussion last night. Perhaps, though, I got stuck on his title. I can be very literal. "Most of the Universe is not like us" - because we only understand 5% of it? Does that mean what we do not understand cannot possibly be a part of our physical bodies or in our Earth or atmosphere? -A
My understanding is that a new collider being constructed at CERN, the Large Hadron Collider, may be able to prove some aspects of string theory -- or may not be able to because of the unbelievably high energy that might be required. The collider, which is being built, "straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva," according to CERN. Even if this device can't unlock secrets of string theory, other research at least hints at the underlying structure of our reality. I have only a fuzzy undersanding of this, but one line of research involves the convergence of basic forces. Electromagnatism and the "weak" force already have been shown to be united. Theorists hope to unite the other basic forces -- the strong force and gravity. Whether and how they intersect apparently will tell us a great deal about the nature of the universe. But don't ask me for details because I don't understand much more about it. Thanks, Joe
theories to explain it (string theory, dark energy, branes, etc) are themselves barely supported by experiment--if at all.
participants (3)
-
Ann House -
Joe Bauman -
Michael Carnes