Re: [Utah-astronomy] Fisheye lens
Hi Debbie, thanks too for the off-list reply: I started shooting astro photos over 30 years ago, I am aware of all the caveats; airplanes, sky-fog, tracking limits, etc. My current set-up is homemade (actually a heavily modified commercial mount from the '70s), I do not use PEC, autoguiders or any digital aids, although I do have a couple of the old Astro-Physics autoguiders. They took all the fun out of it! :( I guide manually, strictly; I've become rather good at it and enjoy it (it's not hard, really. Really!). Go-to mounts and other commercial astro-hardware "for the masses" are not needed here. Old habits I guess. I just had a question about trailing near the edge of the field with a wide-angle lens due to differential atmospheric refraction. (much wider than a 50mm, I'm talking about something shorter than 17mm). You can get the zenith AND horizon in the same shot! What-if stuff. Rob, thanks for your off-list reply also, but the digest just came-through anyway. I use a pair of ancient Pentax K bodies, the fisheye lens in this case is the Russian Zenitar K2,8/16, got for pennies on the dollar on eBay a couple of years ago. Yes, I know it's "student" gear, but I am not going to replace it with high-dollar stuff because it works, works well, I'm used to it, it's paid-for, all my adapters fit it, and money for all-new equipment isn't likely unless it falls from the sky, so any suggestions would have to refrain from including new commercial hardware to be useful. Thanks again!
From: <astrodeb@charter.net> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:00:30 -0700 Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Fisheye lens
First of all, you would need a very dark sky to avoid sky fog. My last batch of slides were limited to 10 minutes because of the sky conditions. With my two-star alignment with my polar scope, I could have gone up to 30 minutes unguided with my 50mm lens if the sky conditions would of allowed it. A fish-eye lens would be even more forgiving as far as tracking goes.
Does your mount have PEC? The best mounts, provided they are accurately polar-aligned and PEC trained, can be left to track unattended and unguided for 30 minutes or more. Of course, the longer exposure the more there is a chance of getting airplane trails.
My 2 cents,
Debbie
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do? http://my.yahoo.com
Hi Chuck I told Debbie that some tracking would be helpful to keep trailing down. Even w/my 7.5mm Fisheye I get distortion at the edge of the circular image. You know 180 is fairly wide field and to expect crisp everywhere is beyond most peoples pocketbooks. The 7.5 is fine though specialized and the 16mm fisheye is good too, when used in creative ways, fine results happen. We have a photographer (unemployed and living in his van) that comes to the lab, he said being unemployed was one of the best things that has ever happened to him, he now can do more of his own photography. We processed some film w/ wide angle (20mm) images of circumpolar trails BUT he found a spot w/ a cross and tiki torches in the scene. The 4 hr exposure also picked up a red overall skyglow from Kahului BUT the shot was spectacular for artistic merit. I guess I'm saying "Go do it and HAVE FUN". Aloha Rob BTW gear is only part of the image, the photographer and vision are most important ;^)
participants (2)
-
Chuck Hards -
Rob Ratkowski