Re: [Utah-astronomy] X37B May 30 10_40_23 mag 2.9 overflight targeting data
Patrick, A watch index error of 20 secs isn't enough to create an acquisition problem. I was thinking more like 5 minutes. My experience was I sat down outside about 3 minutes before T-0, took a deep breath and fixed the binos on Mars. After a 2-3 minutes, I put the binos down, took one deep breath and then put the binos back up to my eyes. There was X37B about 2/3s of the way through the FOV. If I had taken 2 breaths and then raised the binos, I would have missed it. Once acquired with binos, it was faint and could be tracked naked eye from a light polluted site. But if I tried to acquire it naked-eye, I would have missed it. Most of the difficulty came from that X37B is a fast mover - like 0.5 to 0.75 deg/sec. That's probably why photos on Spaceweather.com are wide-angle 3-4 deg shots fixed on target star and just show the track. No one seems to be achieving a telescopic high-mag hand-tracked image. - Kurt
participants (1)
-
Canopus56