Re: [Utah-astronomy] Photosynthesis
It needn't be just a process to produce carbohydrates and sugars-
Granted that there may be room for all sorts of other frameworks, but carbon provides a pretty good basis for life. It's one of the most promiscuous of the lighter elements and can form all sorts of complex molecules. Even with very different life-forms, it's possible to imagine that a lot of the basic chemistry might be the same.
Seems I've seen either a Website or documentary lately that postulated animals that used sunlight to produce food. They looked like big mushrooms, but were mobile and competed for sun-lit real estate. Does that ring a bell?
Yeah, it was a documentary (I think on National Geographic) that postulated some possible life forms around other types of star systems. The animation was kind of cheesy. I enjoyed it a bit, but was a bit put-off that they only seemed to have 2-3 life-forms per planet. I'm guessing that just about any biosphere capable of generating large creatures is going to be quite rich in species.
My goodness, you mean to imply that evolution may work universally? Those Godless, promiscuous elements... ;) What about sulphur? Carl Sagan agreed with you (and I, for that matter), stating that he was an admitted "carbon chauvenist". The apparent abundance of water in the universe would tend to support carbon processes, as well. --- Michael Carnes <michaelcarnes@earthlink.net> wrote:
Granted that there may be room for all sorts of other frameworks, but carbon provides a pretty good basis for life. It's one of the most promiscuous of the lighter elements and can form all sorts of complex molecules. Even with very different life-forms, it's possible to imagine that a lot of the basic chemistry might be the same.
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
participants (2)
-
Chuck Hards -
Michael Carnes