Another case of intellectual “delirium tremens”. Where do these people come from? They have way too much time on their hands if they’re coming up with this phantasmagoric blather. They need to get a job. By the way, how did those marine fossil assemblages come to be at the top of the Himalayas if plates never crash into one another? I guess those mollusks just felt frisky one day and climbed to 29,000 feet. Under this guy’s theory how did the Himalayas arise? I suppose ‘they were inordinately high to begin with’ would be his reply. Remember, he said plates never run into each other, they only “grow” apart. Chuck replied he did not see the word subduction in the little bit that he read. Had he listened to “Press Clip #0” he would have found out why. The guy completely discounts subduction from the rip. If you discount subduction, then Wegener’s theory wouldn’t make a lot of sense. I had to temper my intellectual pursuit at this point. I was beginning to wretch. Oh, sorry. I got a little carried away. What’s my comment: It’s nonsense. Dave On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Mark Shelton wrote:
Hi, All
I was talking to a fellow astronomer the other evening and he told me to go to a web site and check out expanding earth, mars etc. theory.
Here is the link:
http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html
This is kind of an interesting Idea.
Any comments
Mark Shelton _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com