Isn't that what SLAS got out of volunteers yesterday. Work with no labor cost.
Anyway, Go Navy, I guess the Dept of Energy needs to reconsider their findings of a few years ago. IE: It was not worth persuing although the government appears to have persued it anyway. On 24 Mar 2009, at 18:40, Chuck Hards wrote:
Pons & Flieshman may be owed the biggest apology since Galileo:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090324/ts_alt_afp/usscienceenergynuclear
Cold fusion was a topic of conversation yesterday during the SPOC work party lunch. We agreed that regardless of what you call it, if one puts X energy in and gets X+1 out (and it's repeatable) it's something to look into.
I also learned that one of the original SLASers, Jerry Montgomery (of Montgomery Observatory fame) has done a lot of study on the subject. I look forward to bending his ear at the next SLAS meeting.
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com