If she added F6 field reducer that would get all the moon in. Ed Ericksen On Saturday, April 4, 2015 8:27 PM, Siegfried Jachmann <siegfried@jachmann.org> wrote: That is because your film (sensor) is 25 x 35 mm, the sensor (chip) is about 15 x 22.5. Image scale doesn't change. You can't squeeze the larger image into a smaller sensor. On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Joan Carman <jcarman6@q.com> wrote:
I have a C-8 f10. Using my old 35 mm SLR (film) with a T-ring adapter, the full moon fit on the film frame with a little extra top and bottom. When I use my 35mm SLR digital (Canon Rebel) in the same configuration , the moon is oversized and is cut off at top and bottom. (Am I jealous of Dave's prime focus lunar photos - yes - damn you Dave :))
What is happening? Can it be fixed?
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
-- Siegfried _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".