Maybe the fellow was wrong himself. I've been out and about on moonless nights where it literally took a compilation of all available stars and planets along with a starlight scope to see much of anything. I think what the fellow saw was the sun and not a planet. I can qualify this based on my experience at our clubs solar events. I usually have my scope on Venus when I can find it, and many times the good people who come to look throught our telscopes are amazed when they look through mine to see that the "Sun" has a shaddow side, or is in phase. Of course who am I to try to tell them any different. ;) Quoting Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com>:
OK, Guy, you're forgiven! You still get points for diving in-there first.
So, of everyone who's run the WayBack machine, what's the consensus?
Is Jupiter the best candidate for the illuminating planet that Willis wrote about?
Guy wrote:
Chuck,
The information I just sent was wrong. Seems these planets were up with the sun.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com