Season’s Greetings all!! Happy days are here again especially now that the sky is clearing somewhat.
I am sometimes curious if my planetarium software (Starry Nights Pro Plus
Rich Oh yeah, I forgot. It was like they took out 2 weeks at the end of Sept of 1725 so that the next day was Oct 15th or something. If you have a planetarium software, run it for a specific date and tell me what you get for the moon. I will see if I get the same thing. thanks Jim --- On Wed, 12/31/08, Rich Allen <rico@ricosweb.net> wrote: From: Rich Allen <rico@ricosweb.net> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Thomas Harriot - first reported astronomical telescope use To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 10:41 AM One of the articles mentioned that the dates recorded by Thomas Harriot were using a different calendar than the current one (Gregorian vs. Julian or something like that), so the dates are 10 days off. I don't remember which way though. Rich Allen Jim Gibson wrote: 6) is telling me the truth. I was up early this morning (Wed 31st) and set up in my back yard in north Orem (4 a.m.ish). I came in the house to check something on my planetarium software when I noticed a satellite on my laptop screen about to pass through where I had been looking with my telescope. I ran outside and peered through my 9X50 finder scope and to my delight I saw the satellite go through my field of view confirming my planetarium software was accurate.
Later on while reading my email, I read with interest Kurt’s (canopus56)
post ‘Thomas Harriot - first reported astronomical telescope use.’ I ran my trusty software back to July 26, 1609 and changed the viewing location to London England and compared. http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/harriot_moon1609_726.gif
I am guessing that the smudge at the top of the sketch would be Grimaldi.
My software showed a waning crescent 25 days old with the terminator very much closer to the western (eastern?) edge with about 10% - 15% exposed in sunlight.
The other picture http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/harriot_moon1610_717.gif
was sketched 17 July 1610. This sketch is very different from the first sketch Harriot made. So to compare I ran my planetarium software to 1610 . What I saw looked very much like what my planetarium software showed me for the year before; a waning crescent moon 26 days old with Grimaldi being the prominent creator.
I give the guy the benefit of the doubt this being all so very new to him;
Harriot observingt and recording.
What I would like to know if anyone with different software has run theirs
back and gotten different results than what I described? I saved images of what my results were but I don't know how to make them available.
Thanks
Jim
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com