Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to discourage or kill the idea, just tossing out ideas and challenges that pop up, making sure all the bases get covered in the initial proposal. Rich --- RStmarie@aol.com wrote:
Rich, Wouldn't it be fairly easy to compare two images taken at the same time from two different locations (provided the location and time was accurately fixed and the optics used were known) and deduce quickly the altitude and path of meteors, the orbit of space junk, and even the existance of NEOs; and also differentiate between the three? To be able to do this all autonomously and to flag the interesting data for professionals to look at later is the crux of John's idea. I think it has merit. Bob
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com