I would respectfully suggest that we finish SPOC-2 completely before alloting ANY resources to a dark-sky site...and I'm a proponent of such a site...but until SPOC-2 is finished, talk is all I'm willing to give on a dark site. Certain people (person), having failed on their (his) SPOC-2 promises, have me in a sour mood regarding future projects. My involvement with SPOC-2 entailed prolonged personal sacrifice, taxing, sustained physical exertion, and monetary expense...which I gladly gave, given the outcome. BUT, the fact that one apathetic participant has seemingly put the whole damn thing on hold has me PI**ED OFF, in light of my own, and others, massive contributions. I hope this isn't a problem on any proposed dark-sky project. C. --- "Warner, Kathleen" <kwarner@acs.utah.edu> wrote:
Do we know who that someone is?
-----Original Message----- From: Patrick Wiggins [mailto:paw@trilobyte.net] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 15:51 To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Dark Sky Update
Since there was quite a discussion here a while back about the dark sky site situation I thought I'd mention that apparently someone has offered to take over the project.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com