Greg: Still trying to deal with today's sad, sad news. As I recall, and bear in mind that it has been a couple of years, the eye-relief was shorter than I had expected, and there was more-than-usual amount of field curvature. It wasn't a bad eyepiece, but I thought it could have been better. I'm a Konig user myself, and the design is capable of more. C. --- Greg Taylor <astronomus_maximus@yahoo.com> wrote:
Chuck,
What displeased you about the Russell Konig? Just Curious.
Greg
--- Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com> wrote:
I spoke with my friend in Ohio last night (the one who owns the Siebert eyepieces I mentioned yesterday).
He told me that the Konig varaint that I wasn't too pleased with was actually made by Russell Optics.
Chuck
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com