Hi all. I've served on the Board as president, vice president and member-at-large, for a total of six years (I think - memory isn't what it used to be). When I lived in SLC, I attended most public events and more private events than I am now able to do, but I hope my opinion still counts. I must (respectfully) disagree with Daniel and Robert. As Erik points out, the issue is one of having adequate support. It is indeed possible to be spread too thin, such that if multiple star parties are scheduled for a given night or weekend one or more may suffer from inadequate SLAS attendance, or worse, none at all. To paraphrase Robert, if you want to go, if it's not too far to drive, if gas is not too expensive or if you have no other obligations by all means go. No one is under obligation to stay home. However, let's not designate every possible event a SLAS-supported public star party, if for no other reason than it becomes a logistical nightmare for the Board and members who do want to support everything that the club does. I believe that I was between Board service the year that we took on too many star parties, as Erik alluded to. I recall that the few of us who did try to be there all the time were simply worn out. And yes, it did come down to just a few who provided support for the exhaustive schedule. Those who think that it isn't possible to do too many star parties either weren't there or don't recall that it did not work. I remember reading about a very active and successful fundraiser and supporter for some given charity - I don't recall which. Because of his success, he was often asked to help other charities raise money. His reply was educational: "Your cause is important, but it is not my cause." I don't believe that SLAS can or should support every cause, even proposed star parties at national parks. Just my thoughts. Kim No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.16/1651 - Release Date: 9/4/2008 6:57 AM