Hummm. Thanks, Patrick, great idea. I've been listening, haven't read all the posts, but I can go back to the newslist archives. It is a really good idea. Our group has had a memorable, respectful debate with intelligent comments on both sides. This is a very valuable exercise for the noodling appendage, as someone called it. I do like the idea of an article for our "Utah Scientific" feature that runs on most Mondays. I could put together a pro- and con- piece, cherrypicking some of the most telling statement on both sides. I haven't kept the posts but I could go to the archives to pick them out. Could all who are comfortable with my using their comments please drop me a line saying it's OK to print them? I won't quote anyone who doesn't say it's OK. I would request a note with name and location. (I guess we know where South Jordan Mom lives!) If I get a good response I will start working on it. Some with great posts might not see this. Maybe those on either side who do see this and want to make sure others get involved could copy this note to them. I have two caveats: first, I'm not positive I will do it because there are always breaking scientific developments, so don't be disappointed if I can't; second, there have been so many good things said that I could not use all of them, and some worthy people's statements might not be printed -- I don't want them to feel bad. Thanks, Joe