I think you and I had a conversation about it that morning, I said it was a measurement error. I didn't know where, but my first guess it they had been Heisenberged. However, I do still think that as we get deeper down into quanta, and further, that Einsteinian physics won't be able to apply. Much like Newtonian physics don't when we are looking at relativistic stuff. Not that anything is proven wrong, but a different set of circumstances call for a different set of rules. Such as quantum entanglement...would such things work over enough distance that relativistic effects give a delay? I don't think there have been lab tests able to do such things yet. And the above is just my uneducated opinion. Not wanting to start any sort of war over this... Dan -- Sent from my phone, please excuse any mispelings or errors. ----- Reply message ----- From: "Chuck Hards" <chuck.hards@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2012 9:47 am Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Faster than light To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Gotta give Dan credit on this one, he was the first to call "B.S." on the FTL results, as I recall. On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:36 AM, daniel turner <outwest112@yahoo.com> wrote:
Oh I expected it. I believe my words were "most likely a calibration error". This qualifies as such an error. The original claim was wrong and is now discredited. But some will never admit it. They are beyond reason. They have their "beliefs"
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club. To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".