Daniel, I have Noise Ninja and I use it often. It is an excellent program. I also have and use NeatImage, which is perhaps a bit more powerful, but requires lots of time to learn and more experimentation to get good results. Noise Ninja is fast and works well without too much fiddling. As a result, I use it more often. I do occasionally resort to NeatImage for really tough jobs. That is my 2-cents worth. Tyler _____________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of daniel turner Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:48 PM To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [Utah-astronomy] noise processing software Has anyone on the list had experience using NoiseNinja? How would you rate the product? Effective or not? DT _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://gallery.utahastronomy.com Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com