My numbers are wrong. I think NASA only has three orbiters left. That would mean they risk 33% of their fleet on any mission, not 25% --- Brent Watson <brentjwatson@yahoo.com> wrote:
The loss of one more ship represents a greater loss, proportionately, to the whole fleet. If you lose one out of six it is only a 17% loss. One of four is a 25% loss. They are now risking 25% of the fleet rather than 17%. Thus the relative risk is greater.
--- "B. Bettilyon" <aaah@sisna.com> wrote:
Please explain.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brent Watson" <brentjwatson@yahoo.com> To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 11:58 AM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Hubble (Again)
The danger is the same, but the relative risk is greater.
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html