Brent: Perhaps the reasons for the time are (1) $$$$$, and (2) the use of reusable technologies instead of the throwaway technologies of the Apollo program, none of which have been yet developed that can support a return to the Moon. -----Original Message----- From: Brent Watson [mailto:brentjwatson@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:06 PM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] President Bush's speech We have already sent men to the Moon eight times, and landed six of those times. Why is it going to take so long (11 years) to return? As far as "abandoning" the space station, the shuttle, and and HST, this is a natural part of progressing. Spend less time supporting old technology and more developing new technology makes sense. Brent --- Joe Bauman <bau@desnews.com> wrote:
Hi Friends, This is the big day. President Bush is to announce the country's new space initative at 1 p.m., and I will be writing a story about it. If someone wants a comment included in my article, pro or con, concerns, encouragement, etc., please send me a note as soon as possible after the talk. Please give me your name as you'd like it in the paper as well as your city of residence. As always, I can't promise that everything I write will get in, and keep it short is the newspaper mantra. Thank you, Joe
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com