I don't know about "vilified" you are entitled to your opinion. You are wrong but you are entitled to that opinion. ;) God forgive me for even thinking this but if a Soyuz fails to make it to orbit or to return our astronauts to earth what do you think will happen then? We can just sign over the title to the ISS because we won't be going back. Steve
From: kimharch@cut.net To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:38:06 -0600 Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Astronaut talk
I expect to be vilified, but what the heck... I disagree that nationalism is an acceptable argument. If the ISS is supposed to promote cooperation, then why not cooperate to a limited extent (ride Russian vehicles) and use the opportunity to pursue our own goals?
Kim
-----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Steve Fisher Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 7:32 PM To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Astronaut talk
Downside?
Loss of pride? Degradation of American exceptionalism? Should I go on? While I agree with you that the ISS has probably not been a huge bennefit, it has at least been an oppirtunity for the United States to Lead, not follow. Lets stand back and do nothing for a while longer and maybe we can pay the French for a ride. Just my two cents worth. Your opinion may vary. Steve
From: kimharch@cut.net To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:58:02 -0600 Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Astronaut talk
Interesting read, Joe. Thanks. Rather than post my comments at the DesNews site, I thought I'd share with this list.
What's the downside of using a tried-and-true Russian vehicle for further ISS missions? Doesn't this allow us to go on to develop the next phase without having to develop and build (or re-use existing technology) a payload system just to service the ISS?
A bit unrelated to your blog: I personally think the ISS is a waste of our time. In my opinion, US/NASA goals should have been (1) return to Moon, and (2) go to Mars, without the stopover at the ISS. I've not read any convincing justification for it (the ISS). Other thoughts?
Kim
-----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Joe Bauman Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 6:14 PM To: Utah Astronomy Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Astronaut talk
Astronaut Kent Rominger spoke Saturday at Clark Planetarium; here's my blog about it (with Cory's interesting photo):
http://www.deseretnews.com/blog/47/10011698/Nightly-news-astronomy-The-Need-
to-Explore.html
Thanks, Joe
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php
----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1498/3536 - Release Date: 03/28/11
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php
----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1498/3536 - Release Date: 03/28/11
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php