I just checked and found I have two of these in the original boxes: http://www.adorama.com/CNRC.html?gclid=CK3DganC3sQCFQotaQodoaYAWQ Happy to part with one for half price. patrick On 04 Apr 2015, at 21:05, Joan Carman <jcarman6@q.com> wrote:
That all makes sense. I think I do have a reducer, somewhere in my old gear. I'll certainly find it before the next eclipse.
Thanks Sig and Ed
----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Ericksen via Utah-Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 8:50:41 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Astrophotography Question
If she added F6 field reducer that would get all the moon in. Ed Ericksen
On Saturday, April 4, 2015 8:27 PM, Siegfried Jachmann <siegfried@jachmann.org> wrote:
That is because your film (sensor) is 25 x 35 mm, the sensor (chip) is about 15 x 22.5. Image scale doesn't change. You can't squeeze the larger image into a smaller sensor.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Joan Carman <jcarman6@q.com> wrote:
I have a C-8 f10. Using my old 35 mm SLR (film) with a T-ring adapter, the full moon fit on the film frame with a little extra top and bottom. When I use my 35mm SLR digital (Canon Rebel) in the same configuration , the moon is oversized and is cut off at top and bottom. (Am I jealous of Dave's prime focus lunar photos - yes - damn you Dave :))
What is happening? Can it be fixed?
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".
-- Siegfried