11 Mar
2011
11 Mar
'11
5:41 p.m.
This is fun stuff to speculate about, but the work needs to be duplicated or independantly validated before I'm going to believe it. I don't see scrupulous technique as any kind of warranty against contamination, especially for this speciman. It would be totally cool if it pans out Joe, but I'm remaining skeptical until someone shows me the money. On 3/10/11, Joe Bauman <josephmbauman@yahoo.com> wrote:
They've been dismissed as several different things, but IMHO contamination is the least likely of the possibilities.