The point isn't how do we get into low-Earth orbit, via Soyuz or shttle; the point is that we need to sustain our crewed space program. If you look at just the practical returns we've had from the program so far, let alone the intangibles, you have to admit it has been a bargain. The same arguments about tight money have killed other important scientific endeavors, and I say they are bogus. They are what forced the country to give up on moon exploration after such a promising start. I'm not religious, but a quote from Jesus seems appropriate: when questioned about the expense of some lotion Mary Magdalene was using to anoint his feet, as the money could have been used for the poor, Jesus said not to worry about that "For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always." We will always have other expenses but if we don't keep crewed space exploration alive now it will slip from our hands. Thanks, Joe --- On Tue, 3/29/11, Chuck Hards <chuck.hards@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Chuck Hards <chuck.hards@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Astronaut talk To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 10:47 AM What's the cost in dollars to sustain "pride" and "exceptionalism"?
It's going to take a lot more than two cents.
If we can cut the defense budget (larger than the entire rest of the world, combined) to pay for it, then we don't have a problem. The Upside is, the Russians are the Walmart of launch vehicles at the moment. Money's tight.
On 3/28/11, Steve Fisher <iotacass1@hotmail.com> wrote:
Downside?
Loss of pride? Degradation of American
exceptionalism? Should I go on?
Just my two cents worth. Your opinion may vary. Steve
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php