Jim,
 
I think the following links will go a long way toward helping you with what you are asking about.  You should definitely look at his discussion about Optimum Magnified Visual Angle and Appendix E from his book.

http://clarkvision.com/visastro/index.html

http://clarkvision.com/visastro/appendix-e.html

Clear skies,

Dale.

 -----Original Message-----
From: Dale Hooper
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Utah Astronomy
Subject: RE: [Utah-astronomy] Seeing Formula

I could see if there is anything in the book, "Visual Astronomy of the Deep Sky" by Roger N. Clark. 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Gibson [mailto:xajax99@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:35 PM
To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Seeing Formula

To the group’s knowledge, has any one run across a formula for determining whether you might be able to see an object or not? I realize that there are factors like how well one sees, what the seeing conditions are, how big and objective one is using etc.

If I made a simple little formula like 1/Mag/Object Size and I applied the formula to M51 with Mag  9.6 and size 5.4’ that would produce a factor of  .019. If I also applied the formula to NGC 4236 with Mag 9.7 and size 18.6’ I would get a factor of .0055. I have never been able to see NGC 4236.  So is it valid for me (using a 12.5” objective) to say that somewhere between .019 and .0055 is a cutoff as to what I can see?  I know this is going to cut some of you wrong, because since I have gotten into astronomy I have never seen soo many get soo excited over soo little.

 

Jim


Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears