9 Aug
2005
9 Aug
'05
7:24 p.m.
That's where David Berlinski and other mathematicians come into the argument. Their claim is that blind evolution is wildly improbable and that some other mechanism or intelligent design is far more probable. Yet another straw man argument Don. No one says there's any such thing as "Blind Evolution". There is Natural Selection (you really ought to actually READ Darwin). Natural Selection means than the less effective mutations get eaten or die from being less fit in some other way. What's left over (the critter with superior DNA) gets to reproduce.
The ID Creationist crowd loves to win arguments nobody is having. It's easier than dealing with facts.