-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 08 August 2003 01:45 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:

Has anyone tried using V.44 compression on 3Com TC? I understand V.44 compression results into better throughput! Is it correct? How mush better throughput is realized? Not enough to talk about. Your customers probably won't notice. I do have quick connect on as well and that works well but only as consistent as your phone lines. MOH is the best part of v92. I have used it for about a year with good results.

Lewis Bergman Texas Communications 4309 Maple St. Abilene, TX 79602-8044 915-695-6962 ext 115 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/NAyQpT00mQjG01gRAqL4AJ9SIAbEGAW1/FS9Te2Xpr9252FDwACggSpN MmY7fHnrdr3s+ZuENDT/U/A= =v7dn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----