hahahahahaha yeah, us small ISP we dont need that thar 'reliability' the you city slicker folks talk about so much. I gotta go to the outhouse now.... be back soon. Commworks... why do we even bother? :) -- Paul Farber Farber Technology farber@admin.f-tech.net Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Steve Brown wrote:
Thomas_Goodman@3com.com writes:
If you don't need the ability to put 1,152 ports in one chassis using Mulit-Spans look at the TCS 4.7 release notes and decide if there is really any need to move past TCS 4.5 and the ER code for DSPs. If not then TCM is not an issue.
Yup, I see many issues on the HiperARC that no one with less than 1,152 ports would possibly want! Some of the issues fixed since 4.5 that a small ISP could care less about are:
o ARC crashes for no reason o IP Pools stuck in "removing state" o ARC does not release IP's from IP pool o ARC crashes if you type "list interfaces" when the system is idle
Obviously these are all trivial bugs unworthy of wasting time on an upgrade.
Steve
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc