We have had a few NFAS groups in our days and I believe we've gotten that down to 1 group of like 8 PRI. Personally I found the lack of understanding and service on the telco's side regarding NFAS to not be worth the cost savings. I've never dealt with Quest but unfortunately with other telco's I spent a significant amount of time explaining to the tech's what NFAS stood for when a problem arouse. Let alone getting some sort of resolution. The bigger the NFAS group....the bigger the hastle typically. Todd -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Randy Cosby Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 1:36 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] NFAS and Qwest Qwest is going to be offering PRI in one of our service areas soon. We have always used chan-t1 on our total controls up to now. I've read through some of the comments about the hassle of coordinating NFAS with the phone company. If we can convert our lines to PRI, we really don't save much money unless we can run NFAS. Has anyone had experience with Qwest and NFAS? Is it worth the hassle? Randy Cosby Vice President InfoWest, Inc. P: 435-674-0165 x 11 F: 435-674-9654 _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc