The backing tracks were apparent throughout but they definitely enhanced the 

music.  Was there even a song that didn't use the backing tracks?

-----Original Message-----

>From: dtmrcls@aol.com

>Sent: May 29, 2007 10:08 AM

>To: police@mailman.xmission.com

>Subject: Re: [Police] vancouver setlist

>

>

> 

>

>

> what?

>what about the backing tracks on SPIRITS or DON'T ? very obvious...

>Dietmar

>

>

> 

>

>-----Original Message-----

>From: Nuno Leite <nfleite@bes.pt>

>To: 'Pete Ashdown' <pashdown@xmission.com>; police@mailman.xmission.com

>Sent: Tue, 29 May 2007 9:25 am

>Subject: RE: [Police] vancouver setlist

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>Backing tracks ONLY on Roxanne.

>

>-----Original Message-----

>From: police-bounces+nfleite=bes.pt@mailman.xmission.com

>[mailto:police-bounces+nfleite=bes.pt@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of

>Pete Ashdown

>Sent: 29 May 2007 17:16

>To: police@mailman.xmission.com

>Subject: Re: [Police] vancouver setlist

>

>As far as I could tell they were.  There were no backing tracks and it

>looked like Sting was keying some of the synth lines for things like

>Invisible Sun with floor pedals.  Andy and Stewart were both mic'ed and

>they were singing, but it was hard for me to pick out their voices.

>

>Chris Babcock wrote:

>> So what I really want to know is.... did our boys sing backup or what?

>

>

>_______________________________________________

>Police mailing list

>Police@mailman.xmission.com

>http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/police

>

>

>

> 

>

>

>________________________________________________________________________

>AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from 

AOL at AOL.com.