I purchased tickets for the 1st
Cheers,
Bruce in
From:
police-bounces@mailman.xmission.com
[mailto:police-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On
Behalf Of foxie
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008
6:08 PM
To: Police list
Subject: Re: [Police] Sting's
comment in 2003 on a Police reunion
Hey!
My take on all this from the beginning has been the following...that
Sting woke up one day in late 2006, with SACRED LOVE doing lousy and the lute
album barely making a dent with us and realized the only way to stay relevant
was to FINALLY reunite.
And what a brilliant stroke it was...put the $$$$ aside for a moment
and think about it...he was the driving force around the highest grossing tour
of 2007, one of the most anticipated tours in the last few decades, playing
tunes he could play in his sleep.
And all the while, he has probably been writing new tunes - tunes that
could have wound up on a new Police studio record, but that is another story! -
for his next solo record which will probably be heralded by everyone when it
comes out in 2009 or 2010.
I may have bashed him here for years and years for not reuniting, his
solo tour setlists, etc...but one thing I NEVER did was say he was dumb.
Incidentally...I paid $260 for a 15th row ticket to their 8/4/08
show at
Imagine my horror to discover this show is now their SECOND to last
show, that the last show will be the next night.
Good To Post, It's Been Too Long,
Rich
----- Original Message
----
From: Fred Berthelot <F.Berthelot@Ramsa.com>
To: Police list <Police@mailman.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2008 4:31:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Police] Sting's comment in 2003 on a Police reunion
Yes, but in 2003, he only had ONE
apartment on Central Park West to pay for…
From:
police-bounces@mailman.xmission.com
[mailto:police-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On
Behalf Of Ross Viner
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008
3:37 PM
To: Police list
Subject: [Police] Sting's comment
in 2003 on a Police reunion
OK, so Sting doesn't want to recreate the past. Fair
enough. But wasn't this tour exactly doing, just that? I mean new
content would be creating something NEW, in the present, wouldn't it? Can
someone explain the difference to me? Or perhaps that was 5 years ago
and he simply changed his mind and did in fact want to recreate the past
(practically a Xerox copy).
Not complaining. I finally got to see my favourite
band. Just noticed the inconsistency. We all change our minds with
some things.
Oh, and here is my birthday gift to you all.
No virus
found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1315 - Release Date: 06/03/2008
9:07 AM
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Police mailing list
Police@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/police
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo
your homepage.