You're presuming, first, that the nav lights were on. Witnesses say so, and perhaps other witnesses would say no. Witnesses are funny lots -- I was sitting as the second, non-involved witness at an intersection collision a few years ago, and even though I was then a practicing personal injury attorney, I wasn't positive of the facts as I had seen them. Running lights. Come on. The news report said a "quarter" hit. On my M15 that means a small white light smaller than a standard LED flashlight on a trail hike. I would NEVER cross a dark, trafficked waterway without a strong light on at least one of my sails. That's Boy Scout stuff. We shouldn't be hassling it here, amongst seasoned sailors. ************** Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 2008. (http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102)
The attitude in California for vehicular drunk driving (over .08 BAC), is easy to follow. If you operate a vehicle drunk and get in an accident (regardless of who is at fault in the accident) the drunk driver is in the wrong! The accident could not have occurred if he was not behind the wheel. That's precisely how they determine fault. And, largely because of M.A.D.D.'s effort to protect children. The drunk is always in the wrong. If he had not driven, the accident could not have occurred. He began being wrong when he started the car. IF, the boat were stationary with anchor deployed and anchor light lit up and everyone aboard were drunk they would be innocent bystanders. They would indeed be parked. But, that apparently, was not the case. If the drunk is not cited, it shows being drunk and operating a boat is okay. If the skipper is not cited, that tells us, it's okay to let a drunk drive your boat. Remembering of course, the Coast Guard says, the skipper is at all times the responsible person. If there is a posted speed limit and it was exceeded and that person is not cited, it tells us all, it's okay to speed. Without defending anyone I maintain, based upon what I have read, it will be difficult to decide who is to be charged / blamed / cited. There is a case for negligence with all three. In the end, the best hope is 50% of the people agree with the final decision. On 6/12/08, Bob Olson <bobo4u@qwest.net> wrote:
On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:40 PM, Paint4Real@aol.com wrote:
I was then a practicing personal injury attorney
Glad to hear you're in recovery. ;-)
'nough said--Bob O.
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Here's the latest about the case as of yesterday...This is about as good as the lawyer who had to apologize to Dick Cheny after deadeye dick shot him in the face. I simply find this fascinating. --Bob O Trial set for Dinius By Tiffany Revelle --Record-Bee staff Article Last Updated: 06/11/2008 09:59:39 PM PDT LAKE COUNTY -- Carmichael resident Bismarck Dinius will stand trial for vehicular manslaughter after Lake County Superior Court Judge Richard C. Martin ruled that Deputy District Attorney John Langan met his burden of proof to hold Dinius to answer for criminal charges in an April 2006 boating accident. Martin said for the preliminary hearing, Langan had to show "a strong suspicion that the crime was committed and that the defendant committed it." Lake County Chief Deputy Sheriff Russell Perdock said on the stand Wednesday that his earlier statement that he was traveling between 40 and 45 miles per hour when his powerboat rear-ended a sailboat was incorrect. He estimated his speed was between 30 and 35 miles per hour on the stand in the fourth and final day of a preliminary hearing for Dinius. "There is gross negligence in this case, and it is that of Chief Deputy Perdock, and that is obvious from the facts that have unfolded in this case. The gross negligence here by Perdock is the sole cause of the death in this case," Haltom said. Dinius piloted a friend's 27-foot O'Day sailboat the night of April 29, 2006, when Perdock's powerboat hit it from behind, ramped over it, snapped the mast and landed on the other side. Dinius is charged with vehicular manslaughter involving a vessel for the death of Willows resident Lynn Thornton, who was a passenger on the sailboat. He also faces a charge of boating under the influence of alcohol. "My council has done a great job exposing some holes in the prosecution, so I'm really surprised about the ruling today," Dinius said after the hearing. Langan alleged Dinius was guilty of ordinary negligence, rather than gross negligence. He said Dinius faces a maximum prison sentence of four years. Perdock said approximately one minute before he hit the sailboat, he checked his powerboat's fuel gauge and glanced at his speedometer and tachometer. He said speed estimates he gave in an interview with Sacramento County Sheriff's Department Sgt. Charles Slabaugh two months after the accident and during a civil deposition in the fall of 2007 were incorrect. "When I gave the testimony, I had not seen the gauges in a while. I was going off of my best recollection. It wasn't until I saw Dan Noyes' report that I realized I had made a terrible error in my interview with Sgt. Slabaugh and in the deposition," Perdock said. Noyes of ABC Channel 7 is following the trial, and videotaped the court proceedings for broadcast. Perdock testified he had consumed "part of a Coors Light," about eight ounces of beer at 5 p.m. He said the visibility was good on the moonless night, and that he saw another boat's stern light 600 yards in front of his boat, enough time to adjust his course. "The collision of the powerboat with the sailboat was an intervening act (in Thornton's death) it was a dependent intervening act. It was dependent on the fact that the stern light was not illuminated, and the pilot could not see it," Langan said in closing statements. The case was set for arraignment on the information July 28. Contact Tiffany Revelle at trevelle@record-bee.com.
Old news.. http://lakeconews.com/content/view/4272/764/ Not only have witnesses said the sailboat's lights were on, an expert has examined the bulbs and determined, from the filaments, that the lights were on. At any event, the deputy was at fault in so many lethal ways that anything the sailboater, moving at a snail's pace, could have done is pretty negligible by comparison. Clearly, no matter what was going on with the sailor, there is funny business going on with law enforcement in Clear Lake that is a disgrace. Tod Mills M17 #408, 1987 galley model BuscaBrisas No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1499 - Release Date: 6/12/2008 7:13 AM
participants (4)
-
Bill Lamica -
Bob Olson -
htmills@zoominternet.net -
Paint4Real@aol.com