RE: [math-fun] 7.11 puzzle
Probably still legal tender for small debts, but I doubt 7-11 would take them. But it raises an interesting generalization: Prices are frequently "2 for 1.29". Suppose we ignore the custom of rounding up (.645 -> .65), and allow (positive) rationals in the solution. It's not clear to me that the set of solutions is still finite, and my enumeration methods would only work if the denominators are bounded. Rich -----Original Message----- From: R. William Gosper To: math-fun@mailman.xmission.com Sent: 12/4/2003 11:19 PM Subject: Re: [math-fun] 7.11 puzzle Are half-cents still legal tender?-) 1.125, 1.28, 3.125, 1.58 _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
In other news, RSA576 has been factored. Erich Friedman/John Hoffman has a different 7-11 puzzle that I think is very nice. Divide a 37x37 square into smaller squares ranging in size from 7x7 to 11x11. I believe the answer is unique. The problem is discussed at http://www.stetson.edu/~efriedma/mathmagic/1298.html I also mention it in my woefully obsolete Square Packing column. In just 4 days, there have been 10 discoveries in square packing. That's good, though! I'll be updating that column soon. http://maa.org/editorial/mathgames/mathgames_12_01_03.html The solution is at http://www.stetson.edu/~efriedma/mathmagic/1298/f37.gif --Ed Pegg Jr.
Attempt to reconstruct the story: Professor O'Blivet blunders into a 7-11 and makes four purchases. He punches each price into his pocket calculator, but unwittingly uses the "*" (times) key instead of the "+" key to total them up. He is nevertheless amused to see the total 7.11, and is blissfully unsurprised when the clerk reaches the same total by adding properly. What were the four prices? Are half-cents still legal tender?-) 1.125, 1.28, 3.125, 1.58 Also, 1.185, 1.20, 1.60, 3.125 . rcs> Suppose we ignore the custom of rounding up (.645 -> .65), and allow (positive) rationals in the solution. It's not clear to me that the set of solutions is still finite, and my enumeration methods would only work if the denominators are bounded. E.g., .81, 5.00/3, 2.00, 7.90/3; .75, 1.96, 15.00/7, 15.80/7; .90, 10.00/7, 1.96, 19.75/7. ("Look, these are three for $5 and those are three for $7.90, and I *insist* on paying the exact price for one of each!") --rwg Spoiler: The intended answer: 1.20, 1.25, 1.50, 3.16
participants (3)
-
Ed Pegg Jr -
R. William Gosper -
Schroeppel, Richard