Re: [math-fun] Possibly naive question about algebraic numbers
Thanks a lot, Franklin and Gareth. I suspected that conditions (*) and (**) together would result in algebraic coordinates, mainlly because I'd expect to have heard of these numbers if they defined a larger class. The theorem Gareth proves seems very basic, so I wonder if it has a name and attribution. Also, given such an integer-polynomial function P: C^n -> C^n such that its Jacobian at each of its roots Z in C^n is non-singular: QUESTION: What can be said about the size of the (necessarily) 0-dimensional set of such roots? (Where of course a root of P means a Z in C^n where P(Z) is the origin in C^n.) --Dan
The theorem Gareth proves seems very basic, so I wonder if it has a name and attribution.
I wondered the same when I needed (a slight variant of) it for my PhD thesis, but I didn't find it elsewhere after a short search. I ended up saying "I'm sure this must be well known to those who know such things" and giving substantially the same proof as I did upthread. :-) I agree that it seems very basic, and it surely must be very well known. Perhaps it's regarded as too obvious to bother mentioning. There's probably a one-line proof using Groebner bases. -- g
participants (2)
-
Daniel Asimov -
Gareth McCaughan